Dynamic hazard identification and scenario mapping using Bayesian network

Abstract Hazard identification is of vital importance in risk management. It is the first step of undertaking accident likelihood and associated consequence analysis. The traditional hazard identification techniques suffer from being static. New information or evolving conditions cannot be easily incorporated in already identified hazards. To overcome this, the Bayesian network is used to bring dynamics to the hazard identification step. The present work develops a new methodology to map hazard scenarios into the Bayesian network model, which enables real time hazard identification. The model presents a probability ranking for hazards using given input observations. It helps to identify the most credible hazard scenarios for further analysis. Sensitivity analyses are also conducted to investigate the influence of the input parameters on identified hazards.

[1]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Hazard identification for innovative LNG regasification technologies , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  Trevor Kletz The constraints on inherently safer design and other innovations , 1999 .

[3]  Trevor Kletz Hazop—past and future , 1997 .

[4]  Rafael Batres,et al.  The use of ontologies for enhancing the use of accident information , 2014 .

[5]  Hai-long Zhu,et al.  Hazard identification and control in the pre-blasting process , 2011 .

[6]  Frank Pearson Lees,et al.  Loss prevention in the process industries : hazard identification, assessment, and control , 1980 .

[7]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Daniel A. Crowl,et al.  Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications , 2001 .

[9]  Min Xie,et al.  Probability analysis of offshore fire by incorporating human and organizational factor , 2011 .

[10]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Risk Management of Domino Effects Considering Dynamic Consequence Analysis , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Accident modeling approach for safety assessment in an LNG processing facility , 2012 .

[12]  Shahid Abbas Abbasi,et al.  Multivariate hazard identification and ranking system , 1998 .

[13]  Adnan Darwiche,et al.  Modeling and Reasoning with Bayesian Networks , 2009 .

[14]  F. P. Lees,et al.  HAZID, A COMPUTER AID FOR HAZARD IDENTIFICATION 1. The STOPHAZ Package and the HAZID Code: An Overview, the Issues and the Structure , 1999 .

[15]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Bayesian Network Classifiers , 1997, Machine Learning.

[16]  Il Moon,et al.  Automatic generation of accident scenarios in domain specific chemical plants , 2003 .

[17]  Régis Farret,et al.  Addressing emerging risks using carbon capture and storage as an example , 2011 .

[18]  Clifton A. Ericson,et al.  Hazard Analysis Techniques for System Safety , 2005 .

[19]  Hans J. Pasman,et al.  The safety barometer: How safe is my plant today? Is instantaneously measuring safety level utopia or realizable? , 2013 .

[20]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Modelling of BP Texas City refinery accident using dynamic risk assessment approach , 2010 .

[21]  Nicola Paltrinieri,et al.  Surface installations intended for Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Atypical accident scenarios and their identification , 2014 .

[22]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Dynamic Procedure for Atypical Scenarios Identification (DyPASI): A new systematic HAZID tool , 2013 .

[23]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Use Maximum-Credible Accident Scenarios for Realistic and Reliable Risk Assessment , 2001 .

[24]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network , 2013 .

[25]  Luigi Portinale,et al.  Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[26]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Dynamic risk assessment using failure assessment and Bayesian theory , 2009 .

[27]  Clifton A. Ericson,et al.  Hazard Analysis Techniques for System Safety: Ericson/Hazard Analysis Techniques for System Safety , 2005 .

[28]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Risk Analysis of Dust Explosion Scenarios Using Bayesian Networks , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[29]  Marc J. Assael,et al.  Fires, Explosions, and Toxic Gas Dispersions: Effects Calculation and Risk Analysis , 2010 .

[30]  Marek J. Druzdzel,et al.  SMILE: Structural Modeling, Inference, and Learning Engine and GeNIE: A Development Environment for Graphical Decision-Theoretic Models , 1999, AAAI/IAAI.

[31]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Overview on Dynamic Approaches to Risk Management in Process Facilities , 2015 .

[32]  Dennis P. Nolan Application of HAZOP and What-If safety reviews to the petroleum, petrochemical and chemical industries , 1994 .

[33]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Safety Weighted Hazard Index (SWeHI): A New, User-friendly Tool for Swift yet Comprehensive Hazard Identification and Safety Evaluation in Chemical Process Industrie , 2001 .