Population-based opportunistic osteoporosis screening: Validation of a fully automated CT tool for assessing longitudinal BMD changes.

METHODS: The automated BMD tool was retrospectively applied to non-contrast abdominal CT scans in 1603 consecutive asymptomatic adults (mean age, 55.9 years; 770 M/833 F) undergoing longitudinal screening (mean interval, 5.7 years; range, 1.0-12.3 years). The spinal column was automatically segmented, with standardized L1 and L2 anterior trabecular ROI placement. Automated and manual L1 HU values were compared, as were automated supine-prone measures. L1-L2 CT attenuation values were converted to BMD values through a linear regression model. BMD values and changes were assessed according to age and gender. RESULTS: Success rate of the automated BMD tool was 99.8 % (four failed cases). Both automated supine vs prone and manual vs automated L1 attenuation measurements showed good agreement. Overall mean annual rate of bone loss was greater in females than males (-2.0% vs -1.0%), but the age-specific rate declined faster in females from age 50 (-2.1%) to age 65 (-0.3%) compared with males (-0.9% to -0.5%). Mean BMD was higher in females than males at age 50 (143.6 vs 135.1  mg cm-3), but post-menopausal bone loss in females reversed this relationship beyond age 60. By age 70, mean BMD in females and males was 100.8 and 107.7  mg cm-3 , respectively. CONCLUSION: This robust, fully automated CT BMD tool allows for both individualized and population-based assessment. Mean BMD was lower in men than women aged 50-60, but accelerated post-menopausal bone loss in women resulted in lower values beyond age 60. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This fully automated tool can be applied to routine abdominal CT scans for prospective or retrospective opportunistic BMD assessment, including change over time. Mean BMD was lower in men compared with women aged 50-60 years, but accelerated bone loss in women during this early post-menopausal period resulted in lower BMD values for women beyond age 60.

[1]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Opportunistic Screening for Osteoporosis Using Body CT Scans Obtained for Other Indications: the UW Experience , 2017, Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism.

[2]  Jianhua Yao,et al.  Feasibility of Simultaneous Computed Tomographic Colonography and Fully Automated Bone Mineral Densitometry in a Single Examination , 2011, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  B. Dawson-Hughes,et al.  The Recent Prevalence of Osteoporosis and Low Bone Mass in the United States Based on Bone Mineral Density at the Femoral Neck or Lumbar Spine , 2014, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  J. Cauley,et al.  Bone Mineral Density Changes during the Menopause Transition in a Multiethnic Cohort of Women , 2008 .

[5]  Sundeep Khosla,et al.  Population‐Based Study of Age and Sex Differences in Bone Volumetric Density, Size, Geometry, and Structure at Different Skeletal Sites , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening: Addition of Quantitative CT Bone Mineral Density Evaluation to CT Colonography. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Radiology.

[7]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Prevalence of Vertebral Compression Fractures on Routine CT Scans According to L1 Trabecular Attenuation: Determining Relevant Thresholds for Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Variation in CT Number and Image Noise Uniformity According to Patient Positioning in MDCT. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  S. Khosla,et al.  A Crisis in the Treatment of Osteoporosis , 2016, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  P. Pickhardt Screening CT colonography: how I do it. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  D. Black,et al.  Clinical Practice. Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  H K Genant,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography for prediction of vertebral fracture risk. , 1985, Bone.

[13]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Future Osteoporotic Fracture Risk Related to Lumbar Vertebral Trabecular Attenuation Measured at Routine Body CT , 2018, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[14]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Vertebral Body Compression Fractures and Bone Density: Automated Detection and Classification on CT Images. , 2017, Radiology.

[15]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Opportunistic Quantitative CT Bone Mineral Density Measurement at the Proximal Femur Using Routine Contrast‐Enhanced Scans: Direct Comparison With DXA in 355 Adults , 2016, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[16]  David H. Kim,et al.  Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography: Prevalence, Benefits, Challenges, and Opportunities. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Richard A Robb,et al.  A Population‐Based Assessment of Rates of Bone Loss at Multiple Skeletal Sites: Evidence for Substantial Trabecular Bone Loss in Young Adult Women and Men , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[18]  Perry J Pickhardt,et al.  Predicting Future Hip Fractures on Routine Abdominal CT Using Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening Measures: A Matched Case-Control Study. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  W. Kalender,et al.  Reference values for trabecular and cortical vertebral bone density in single and dual-energy quantitative computed tomography. , 1989, European journal of radiology.

[20]  R. Summers Progress in Fully Automated Abdominal CT Interpretation. , 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  F. O'Brien,et al.  Variation of trabecular microarchitectural parameters in cranial, caudal and mid‐vertebral regions of the ovine L3 vertebra , 2009, Journal of anatomy.

[22]  S. Silverman,et al.  The clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis: a position statement from the National Bone Health Alliance Working Group , 2014, Osteoporosis International.

[23]  David H. Kim,et al.  Colorectal Findings at Repeat CT Colonography Screening after Initial CT Colonography Screening Negative for Polyps Larger than 5 mm. , 2017, Radiology.

[24]  O. Johnell,et al.  FRAX™ and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK , 2008, Osteoporosis International.

[25]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using the sagittal reconstruction from routine abdominal CT for combined assessment of vertebral fractures and density , 2016, Osteoporosis International.

[26]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Phantomless calibration of CT scans for measurement of BMD and bone strength-Inter-operator reanalysis precision. , 2017, Bone.

[27]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Simultaneous screening for osteoporosis at CT colonography: Bone mineral density assessment using MDCT attenuation techniques compared with the DXA reference standard , 2011, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[28]  Ross W. Filice,et al.  Implementing Machine Learning in Radiology Practice and Research. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  Bradley J. Erickson Machine Learning: Discovering the Future of Medical Imaging , 2017, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[30]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Opportunistic Screening for Osteoporosis Using Abdominal Computed Tomography Scans Obtained for Other Indications , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[31]  P. Pickhardt Imaging and Screening for Colorectal Cancer with CT Colonography. , 2017, Radiologic clinics of North America.