The main sequence of star-forming galaxies at z ∼ 0.6: reinstating major mergers

The relation between the star formation rate and the stellar mass of star-forming galaxies has been used to argue that major mergers cannot be the main driver of star formation. Here, we re-examine these arguments using the representative IMAGES-CDFS sample of star-forming galaxies at z=0.4-0.75, taking advantage of their previously established classification into pre-fusion, fusion, and relaxing galaxy mergers. Contrary to previous claims, we show there is no tension between the main sequence scatter and the average duration of the fusion star formation rate SFR peak. We confirm previous estimates of the fraction of SFR due to morphologically-selected galaxies (~23%) or the SFR enhancement due to major merger during the fusion phase (~10%). However, galaxy mergers are not instantaneous processes, which implies that the total fraction of the SFR associated to galaxies undergoing major mergers must account for the three merger phases. When doing so, galaxies involved in major mergers are found to represent 53-88% of the total SFR at z~0.6. The fraction of LIRGs in the fusion phase is found to be in agreement with the observed morphological fraction of LIRGs without disks and with the observed and expected major merger rates at z<1.5.

[1]  P. McCarthy,et al.  DYNAMO – I. A sample of Hα-luminous galaxies with resolved kinematics , 2013, 1310.6082.

[2]  CEA-Saclay,et al.  THE ROLE OF GALAXY INTERACTION IN THE SFR–M* RELATION: CHARACTERIZING MORPHOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF Herschel-SELECTED GALAXIES AT 0.2 < z < 1.5 , 2013, 1309.4459.

[3]  H. Fu,et al.  THE INTRINSIC SCATTER ALONG THE MAIN SEQUENCE OF STAR-FORMING GALAXIES AT z ∼ 0.7 , 2013, 1309.4093.

[4]  C. Brook,et al.  The MaGICC volume: reproducing statistical properties of high-redshift galaxies , 2013, 1302.2618.

[5]  M. Dopita,et al.  The insignificance of major mergers in driving star formation at z ≃ 2 , 2012, 1210.4160.

[6]  P. Hopkins,et al.  GALAXY DISKS DO NOT NEED TO SURVIVE IN THE ΛCDM PARADIGM: THE GALAXY MERGER RATE OUT TO z ∼ 1.5 FROM MORPHO-KINEMATIC DATA , 2012, 1206.0008.

[7]  G. Brammer,et al.  THE STAR FORMATION MASS SEQUENCE OUT TO z = 2.5 , 2012, 1205.0547.

[8]  A. Cimatti,et al.  THE LESSER ROLE OF STARBURSTS IN STAR FORMATION AT z = 2 , 2011, 1108.0933.

[9]  A. Koekemoer,et al.  GALAXY STRUCTURE AND MODE OF STAR FORMATION IN THE SFR–MASS PLANE FROM z ∼ 2.5 TO z ∼ 0.1 , 2011, 1107.0317.

[10]  D. Calzetti,et al.  GOODS–Herschel: an infrared main sequence for star-forming galaxies , 2011, 1105.2537.

[11]  M. Puech.  Clumpy galaxies at z ∼ 0.6: kinematics, stability and comparison with analogues at other redshifts , 2010, 1003.3116.

[12]  A. Dekel,et al.  On the origin of the galaxy star‐formation‐rate sequence: evolution and scatter , 2009, 0912.2169.

[13]  G. Cresci,et al.  THE IMPACT OF COLD GAS ACCRETION ABOVE A MASS FLOOR ON GALAXY SCALING RELATIONS , 2009, 0912.1858.

[14]  Joel R. Primack,et al.  The effect of mass ratio on the morphology and time-scales of disc galaxy mergers: Effect of mass ratio on merger morphology , 2009, 0912.1590.

[15]  Joel R. Primack,et al.  The effect of gas fraction on the morphology and time-scales of disc galaxy mergers , 2009, 0912.1593.

[16]  P. Hopkins,et al.  Mergers, active galactic nuclei and ‘normal’ galaxies: contributions to the distribution of star formation rates and infrared luminosity functions , 2009, 0911.1131.

[17]  H. Rix,et al.  LESS THAN 10 PERCENT OF STAR FORMATION IN z ∼ 0.6 MASSIVE GALAXIES IS TRIGGERED BY MAJOR INTERACTIONS , 2009, 0907.3728.

[18]  M. Rodrigues,et al.  The Hubble sequence: just a vestige of merger events? , 2009, 0903.3962.

[19]  F. Hammer,et al.  The baryonic content and Tully-Fisher relation at z~0.6 , 2009, 0903.3961.

[20]  H. Rix,et al.  HISTORY OF GALAXY INTERACTIONS AND THEIR IMPACT ON STAR FORMATION OVER THE LAST 7 Gyr FROM GEMS , 2009, 0903.3700.

[21]  Lars Hernquist,et al.  HOW DO DISKS SURVIVE MERGERS? , 2008, 0806.1739.

[22]  A. Kembhavi,et al.  IMAGES - III. The evolution of the near-infrared Tully-Fisher relation over the last 6 Gyr , 2008, 0803.3002.

[23]  B. Guiderdoni,et al.  IMAGES. II. A surprisingly low fraction of undisturbed rotating spiral disks at z ~ 0.6 The morpho-k , 2008, 0803.2370.

[24]  Garching,et al.  The Contribution of Star Formation and Merging to Stellar Mass Buildup in Galaxies , 2008, 0803.1489.

[25]  H.Dannerbauer,et al.  IMAGES. I. Strong evolution of galaxy kinematics since z = 1 , 2007, 0711.2305.

[26]  B. Neichel,et al.  First detection of a minor merger a z~0.6 , 2007, 0711.0611.

[27]  R. Somerville,et al.  The effect of galaxy mass ratio on merger-driven starbursts , 2007, 0709.3511.

[28]  J. Starck,et al.  The reversal of the star formation-density relation in the distant universe , 2007, astro-ph/0703653.

[29]  Columbia,et al.  Star Formation in AEGIS Field Galaxies since z = 1.1: The Dominance of Gradually Declining Star Formation, and the Main Sequence of Star-forming Galaxies , 2007, astro-ph/0701924.

[30]  E. Floc’h,et al.  Optical Morphology Evolution of Infrared Luminous Galaxies in GOODS-N , 2005, astro-ph/0509037.

[31]  Tucson,et al.  Infrared Luminosity Functions from the Chandra Deep Field-South: The Spitzer View on the History of Dusty Star Formation at 0 ≲ z ≲ 1* , 2005, astro-ph/0506462.

[32]  Carnegie-Mellon,et al.  A Merger-driven Scenario for Cosmological Disk Galaxy Formation , 2005, astro-ph/0503369.

[33]  H. Rix,et al.  Toward an Understanding of the Rapid Decline of the Cosmic Star Formation Rate , 2005, astro-ph/0502246.

[34]  Barry Rothberg,et al.  A Deep K-Band Photometric Survey of Merger Remnants , 2004 .

[35]  H Germany,et al.  Did most present-day spirals form during the last 8 Gyr? - A formation history with violent episodes revealed by panchromatic observations , 2004, astro-ph/0410518.

[36]  F. Hammer,et al.  HST/WFPC2 morphologies and color maps of distant luminous infrared galaxies , 2004, astro-ph/0403476.

[37]  J. Brinkmann,et al.  The physical properties of star-forming galaxies in the low-redshift universe , 2003, astro-ph/0311060.

[38]  E. Bell,et al.  The Optical and Near-Infrared Properties of Galaxies. I. Luminosity and Stellar Mass Functions , 2003, astro-ph/0302543.

[39]  O. Fèvre,et al.  15 Micron Infrared Space Observatory Observations of the 1415+52 Canada-France Redshift Survey Field: The Cosmic Star Formation Rate as Derived from Deep Ultraviolet, Optical, Mid-Infrared, and Radio Photometry , 1999 .

[40]  A. Cimatti,et al.  Herschel : the first science highlights Special feature L etter to the E ditor The first Herschel view of the mass-SFR link in high-z galaxies , 2010 .