Virtual Fragment Screening: Discovery of Histamine H3 Receptor Ligands Using Ligand-Based and Protein-Based Molecular Fingerprints
暂无分享,去创建一个
Saskia Nijmeijer | Chris de Graaf | Albert J. Kooistra | Raimund Mannhold | Enade Perdana Istyastono | Francesco Sirci | Henry F. Vischer | Martien Kuijer | Maikel Wijtmans | Rob Leurs | Iwan J. P. de Esch | R. Mannhold | R. Leurs | H. Vischer | A. Kooistra | I. D. Esch | C. Graaf | M. Kuijer | F. Sirci | E. Istyastono | M. Wijtmans | S. Nijmeijer
[1] David S. Wishart,et al. DrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for ‘Omics’ research on drugs , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..
[2] John P. Overington,et al. ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..
[3] R. Leurs,et al. Molecular aspects of the histamine H3 receptor. , 2007, Biochemical pharmacology.
[4] Christine Humblet,et al. Computation of 3D queries for ROCS based virtual screens , 2009, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[5] Hugo Gutiérrez-de-Terán,et al. Ligand-, structure- and pharmacophore-based molecular fingerprints: a case study on adenosine A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 receptor antagonists , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.
[6] Yi-Jun Guo,et al. Molecular basis for the interaction of histamine with the histamine H2 receptor. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[7] R. Stevens,et al. Crystal structure-based virtual screening for fragment-like ligands of the human histamine H(1) receptor. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[8] David Rogers,et al. Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[9] Lorenz C. Blum,et al. Chemical space as a source for new drugs , 2010 .
[10] P. Goodford. A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules. , 1985, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[11] I. D. de Esch,et al. Small and Colorful Tesserae Make Beautiful Mosaics: Fragment‐based Chemogenomics Introduction , 2022 .
[12] Woody Sherman,et al. Computational approaches for fragment-based and de novo design. , 2010, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[13] Christopher W Murray,et al. Experiences in fragment-based drug discovery. , 2012, Trends in pharmacological sciences.
[14] Chaok Seok,et al. A statistical rescoring scheme for protein–ligand docking: Consideration of entropic effect , 2008, Proteins.
[15] I. D. de Esch,et al. Several down, a few to go: histamine H3 receptor ligands making the final push towards the market? , 2011, Expert opinion on investigational drugs.
[16] Dennis M. Krüger,et al. Comparison of Structure‐ and Ligand‐Based Virtual Screening Protocols Considering Hit List Complementarity and Enrichment Factors , 2010, ChemMedChem.
[17] Didier Rognan,et al. Docking Methods for Virtual Screening: Principles and Recent Advances , 2011 .
[18] Z. Deng,et al. Bridging chemical and biological space: "target fishing" using 2D and 3D molecular descriptors. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[19] Anna Vulpetti,et al. Tautomer Preference in PDB Complexes and its Impact on Structure-Based Drug Discovery , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[20] Paolo Benedetti,et al. FLAP: GRID Molecular Interaction Fields in Virtual Screening. Validation using the DUD Data Set , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[21] Michael Berlin,et al. Histamine H3 receptor as a drug discovery target. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[22] Jonas Boström,et al. Assessing the performance of OMEGA with respect to retrieving bioactive conformations. , 2003, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[23] Saskia Nijmeijer,et al. Molecular determinants of ligand binding modes in the histamine H(4) receptor: linking ligand-based three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) models to in silico guided receptor mutagenesis studies. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[24] György M. Keserü,et al. Impact of Ligand Protonation on Virtual Screening against β-Secretase (BACE1) , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[25] J. Irwin,et al. ZINC ? A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening. , 2005 .
[26] Junmei Wang,et al. Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..
[27] Xiuzhen Huang,et al. Maximum common subgraph: some upper bound and lower bound results , 2006, BMC Bioinform..
[28] Stefano Sabatini,et al. Discovery of novel inhibitors of the NorA multidrug transporter of Staphylococcus aureus. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[29] Theofanis Sapatinas,et al. Discriminant Analysis and Statistical Pattern Recognition , 2005 .
[30] Lei Shi,et al. The binding site of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors: the transmembrane segments and second extracellular loop. , 2002, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.
[31] M. H Fulekar,et al. Bioinformatics : applications in life and environmental sciences , 2009 .
[32] Loriano Storchi,et al. New and Original pKa Prediction Method Using Grid Molecular Interaction Fields , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[33] Ray A. Jarvis,et al. Clustering Using a Similarity Measure Based on Shared Near Neighbors , 1973, IEEE Transactions on Computers.
[34] Vadim Cherezov,et al. Diversity and modularity of G protein-coupled receptor structures. , 2012, Trends in pharmacological sciences.
[35] R. Fisher. THE USE OF MULTIPLE MEASUREMENTS IN TAXONOMIC PROBLEMS , 1936 .
[36] M. H. Fulekar. Comprar Bioinformatics · Applications in Life and Environmental Sciences | Fulekar, M.H. | 9781402088797 | Springer , 2009 .
[37] David Calkins,et al. Towards the comprehensive, rapid, and accurate prediction of the favorable tautomeric states of drug-like molecules in aqueous solution , 2010, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[38] I. D. de Esch,et al. Molecular determinants of selective agonist and antagonist binding to the histamine H₄ receptor. , 2011, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[39] G. Rishton. Reactive compounds and in vitro false positives in HTS , 1997 .
[40] Didier Rognan,et al. Customizing G Protein-coupled receptor models for structure-based virtual screening. , 2009, Current pharmaceutical design.
[42] E. Istyastono. Computational Studies of the Histamine H4 Receptor-Ligand Interactions , 2012 .
[43] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. WOMBAT and WOMBAT‐PK: Bioactivity Databases for Lead and Drug Discovery , 2008 .
[44] Cen Gao,et al. Estimating binding affinities by docking/scoring methods using variable protonation states , 2011, Proteins.
[45] Gilles Marcou,et al. Optimizing Fragment and Scaffold Docking by Use of Molecular Interaction Fingerprints , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[46] R. Leurs,et al. The histamine H3 receptor: from gene cloning to H3 receptor drugs , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[47] Christopher R. Corbeil,et al. Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go , 2008, British journal of pharmacology.
[48] John Dunlop,et al. The role of transmembrane helix 5 in agonist binding to the human H3 receptor. , 2002, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.
[49] Thomas Stützle,et al. An ant colony optimization approach to flexible protein–ligand docking , 2007, Swarm Intelligence.
[50] X Chen,et al. The binding database: overview and user's guide. , 2001, Biopolymers.
[51] J. Gasteiger,et al. Neural networks as data mining tools in drug design , 2003 .
[52] Andreas Bender,et al. Recognizing Pitfalls in Virtual Screening: A Critical Review , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[53] H Hayashi,et al. Site-directed mutagenesis of the histamine H1 receptor: roles of aspartic acid107, asparagine198 and threonine194. , 1994, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.
[54] Saskia Nijmeijer,et al. Triazole ligands reveal distinct molecular features that induce histamine H4 receptor affinity and subtly govern H4/H3 subtype selectivity. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[55] I. D. de Esch,et al. A chemical switch for the modulation of the functional activity of higher homologues of histamine on the human histamine H3 receptor: effect of various substitutions at the primary amino function. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[56] Rob Leurs,et al. Keynote review: histamine H3 receptor antagonists reach out for the clinic. , 2005, Drug discovery today.
[57] Willem P. van Hoorn,et al. Designing Compound Subsets: Comparison of Random and Rational Approaches Using Statistical Simulation , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[58] B. Shoichet,et al. Molecular docking and ligand specificity in fragment-based inhibitor discovery. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.
[59] Chris de Graaf,et al. Ligand efficiency as a guide in fragment hit selection and optimization. , 2010, Drug discovery today. Technologies.
[60] Darren R. Flower,et al. On the Properties of Bit String-Based Measures of Chemical Similarity , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[61] Andreas Bender,et al. How Similar Are Similarity Searching Methods? A Principal Component Analysis of Molecular Descriptor Space , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[62] Woody Sherman,et al. Analysis and comparison of 2D fingerprints: insights into database screening performance using eight fingerprint methods , 2010, J. Cheminformatics.
[63] Richard D. Taylor,et al. Virtual Screening Using Protein—Ligand Docking: Avoiding Artificial Enrichment. , 2004 .
[64] Richard J. Hall,et al. Docking performance of fragments and druglike compounds. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[65] Ajay N. Jain,et al. Recommendations for evaluation of computational methods , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[66] Thierry Kogej,et al. Multifingerprint Based Similarity Searches for Targeted Class Compound Selection , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[67] Paul M. Selzer,et al. The Impact of Tautomer Forms on Pharmacophore-Based Virtual Screening , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[68] P Willett,et al. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.
[69] Scott P. Brown,et al. A unified, probabilistic framework for structure- and ligand-based virtual screening. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[70] M. Congreve,et al. A 'rule of three' for fragment-based lead discovery? , 2003, Drug discovery today.
[71] I. D. de Esch,et al. N-substituted piperidinyl alkyl imidazoles: discovery of methimepip as a potent and selective histamine H3 receptor agonist. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[72] Elizabeth Yuriev,et al. Challenges and advances in computational docking: 2009 in review , 2011, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.
[73] James E. J. Mills,et al. High-Throughput Virtual Screening of Proteins Using GRID Molecular Interaction Fields , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[74] Didier Rognan,et al. Structure‐Based Discovery of Allosteric Modulators of Two Related Class B G‐Protein‐Coupled Receptors , 2011, ChemMedChem.
[75] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. Property distribution of drug-related chemical databases* , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[76] William A. Goddard,et al. Structure-Based Prediction of Subtype Selectivity of Histamine H3 Receptor Selective Antagonists in Clinical Trials , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[77] J. A. Grant,et al. A fast method of molecular shape comparison: A simple application of a Gaussian description of molecular shape , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..
[78] Andreas Bender,et al. "Virtual fragment linking": an approach to identify potent binders from low affinity fragment hits. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[79] Y. Cheng,et al. Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. , 1973, Biochemical pharmacology.
[80] M. Congreve,et al. Recent developments in fragment-based drug discovery. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[81] Loriano Storchi,et al. Tautomer Enumeration and Stability Prediction for Virtual Screening on Large Chemical Databases. , 2009 .
[82] Rob Leurs,et al. Evaluation of Histamine H1-, H2-, and H3-Receptor Ligands at the Human Histamine H4 Receptor: Identification of 4-Methylhistamine as the First Potent and Selective H4 Receptor Agonist , 2005, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
[83] Rob Leurs,et al. Transforming fragments into candidates: small becomes big in medicinal chemistry. , 2009, Drug discovery today.
[84] Leonardo Pardo,et al. An Activation Switch in the Rhodopsin Family of G Protein-coupled Receptors , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[85] Gabriele Cruciani,et al. A Common Reference Framework for Analyzing/Comparing Proteins and Ligands. Fingerprints for Ligands And Proteins (FLAP): Theory and Application , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[86] Massimo Baroni,et al. Virtual screening for novel openers of pancreatic K(ATP) channels. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[87] Pedro Alexandrino Fernandes,et al. Protein–ligand docking: Current status and future challenges , 2006, Proteins.
[88] Hugo O Villar,et al. Computational techniques in fragment based drug discovery. , 2007, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[89] Naomie Salim,et al. Analysis and Display of the Size Dependence of Chemical Similarity Coefficients , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[90] Matthew Paul Gleeson,et al. QM/MM As a Tool in Fragment Based Drug Discovery. A Cross-Docking, Rescoring Study of Kinase Inhibitors , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[91] Thomas E. Exner,et al. pKa based protonation states and microspecies for protein–ligand docking , 2010, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[92] R. Smits,et al. Fragment library screening reveals remarkable similarities between the G protein-coupled receptor histamine H4 and the ion channel serotonin 5-HT3A , 2011, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.
[93] Mathias Wawer,et al. Similarity-Potency Trees: A Method to Search for SAR Information in Compound Data Sets and Derive SAR Rules , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[94] Philip M. Dean,et al. slate: A method for the superposition of flexible ligands , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[95] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. Strategies for compound selection. , 2004, Current drug discovery technologies.
[96] F. Monsma,et al. Molecular modeling and site-specific mutagenesis of the histamine-binding site of the histamine H4 receptor. , 2002, Molecular pharmacology.
[97] B. Cosimelli,et al. Absolute configuration and biological profile of two thiazinooxadiazol-3-ones with L-type calcium channel activity: a study of the structural effects. , 2012, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.
[98] Yvonne C. Martin,et al. Let’s not forget tautomers , 2009, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[99] Anthony Nicholls,et al. What do we know and when do we know it? , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[100] Jean-Louis Reymond,et al. Visualisation and subsets of the chemical universe database GDB-13 for virtual screening , 2011, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[101] D. Rognan,et al. Selective structure-based virtual screening for full and partial agonists of the beta2 adrenergic receptor. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.