Naming and Necessity
暂无分享,去创建一个
I hope that some people see some connection between the two topics in the title. If not, anyway, such connections will be developed in the course of these talks. Furthermore, because of the use of tools involving reference and necessity in analytic philosophy today, our views on these topics really have wide-ranging implications for other problems in philosophy that traditionally might be thought far-removed, like arguments over the mind-body problem or the so-called ‘identity thesis’. Materialism, in this form, often now gets involved in very intricate ways in questions about what is necessary or contingent in identity of properties — questions like that. So, it is really very important to philosophers who may want to work in many domains to get clear about these concepts. Maybe I will say something about the mind-body problem in the course of these talks. I want to talk also at some point (I don’t know if I can get it in) about substances and natural kinds.
[1] John R. Searle,et al. II.—PROPER NAMES , 1958 .
[2] Paul Ziff,et al. Semantic Analysis , 1960 .
[3] Keith S. Donnellan. Reference and Definite Descriptions , 1966 .
[4] David Lewis. Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic , 1968 .