Radiation Exposure and Vascular Access in Acute Coronary Syndromes: The RAD-Matrix Trial.

[1]  M. Penco,et al.  Radiation dose absorbed by operators during transradial percutaneous coronary procedures comparing different protective drapes: the RADIATION study. , 2017, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[2]  A. Baumbach,et al.  Assessing the cardiology community position on transradial intervention and the use of bivalirudin in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive management: results of an EAPCI survey. , 2016, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[3]  M. Togni,et al.  Radiation Exposure of the Operator During Coronary Interventions (from the RADIO Study). , 2016, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  S. Bangalore,et al.  Radiation exposure in relation to the arterial access site used for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, The Lancet.

[5]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Effect of Vascular Access Site Choice on Radiation Exposure During Coronary Angiography: The REVERE Trial (Randomized Evaluation of Vascular Entry Site and Radiation Exposure). , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[6]  S. Mehta,et al.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Radiation Protection With a Patient Lead Shield and a Novel, Nonlead Surgical Cap for Operators Performing Coronary Angiography or Intervention , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[8]  A. Roguin,et al.  A randomized study comparing the use of a pelvic lead shield during trans‐radial interventions: Threefold decrease in radiation to the operator but double exposure to the patient , 2015, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[9]  M. Valgimigli.  Design and rationale for the Minimizing Adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic Implementation of angioX program. , 2014, American heart journal.

[10]  M. Valgimigli,et al.  Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure comparing transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary procedures: rationale and design of the minimizing adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX - RAdiation Dose study (RAD-M , 2014, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.

[11]  H. Heidbuchel,et al.  The appropriate and justified use of medical radiation in cardiovascular imaging: a position document of the ESC Associations of Cardiovascular Imaging, Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Electrophysiology. , 2014, European heart journal.

[12]  D. Angiolillo,et al.  Operator radiation exposure and physical discomfort during a right versus left radial approach for coronary interventions: a randomized evaluation. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[13]  P. Gao,et al.  Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[14]  R. Diletti,et al.  Operator exposure to x-ray in left and right radial access during percutaneous coronary procedures: OPERA randomised study , 2013, Heart.

[15]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  C. Clement.  Independent but not isolated , 2012, Annals of the ICRP.

[17]  H. Lange,et al.  Reduction of operator radiation dose by a pelvic lead shield during cardiac catheterization by radial access: comparison with femoral access. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[18]  J H Hendry,et al.  ICRP PUBLICATION 118: ICRP Statement on Tissue Reactions and Early and Late Effects of Radiation in Normal Tissues and Organs — Threshold Doses for Tissue Reactions in a Radiation Protection Context , 2012, Annals of the ICRP.

[19]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2011, European heart journal.

[20]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Operator Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Coronary Procedures Through the Left or Right Radial Approach: The TALENT Dosimetric Substudy , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[21]  N. Theocharopoulos,et al.  Occupational exposure in the electrophysiology laboratory: quantifying and minimizing radiation burden. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[22]  H. Lange,et al.  Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention by radial or femoral approach , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[23]  Stephen Balter,et al.  ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task , 2005, Circulation.

[24]  Stephen Balter,et al.  ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  D. Malone,et al.  The value of digital personal dosemeters in angiography/interventional radiology: preliminary experience. , 2001, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[26]  Ronald R. Bresell.  NCRP Report 122: Use of Personal Monitors to Estimate Effective Dose Equivalent and Effective Dose to Workers for External Exposure to Low‐let Radiation , 1996 .

[27]  H. Claycamp,et al.  Use of personal monitors to estimate effective dose equivalent and effective dose to workers for external exposure to low-LET radiation , 1995 .