Acceptable consistency analysis of interval reciprocal comparison matrices

When a decision maker expresses his/her opinions by means of an interval reciprocal comparison matrix, the study of consistency becomes a very important aspect in decision making in order to avoid a misleading solution. In the present paper, an acceptably consistent interval reciprocal comparison matrix is defined, which can be reduced to an acceptably consistent crisp reciprocal comparison matrix when the intervals become exact numbers. An interval reciprocal comparison matrix with unacceptable consistency can be easily adjusted such that the revised matrix possesses acceptable consistency. Utilizing a convex combination method, a family of crisp reciprocal comparison matrices with acceptable consistency can be obtained, whose weights are further found to exhibit a style of convex combination, and aggregated to obtain interval weights from an acceptably consistent interval reciprocal comparison matrix. A novel, simple yet effective formula of possibility degree is presented to rank interval weights. Numerical results are calculated to show the quality and quantity of the proposed approaches and compare with other existing procedures.

[1]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  A two-stage logarithmic goal programming method for generating weights from interval comparison matrices , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[2]  Bruce L. Golden,et al.  Linear programming models for estimating weights in the analytic hierarchy process , 2005, Comput. Oper. Res..

[3]  Patrick T. Harker,et al.  The Analytic hierarchy process : applications and studies , 1989 .

[4]  G. Crawford The geometric mean procedure for estimating the scale of a judgement matrix , 1987 .

[5]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  The continuous ordered weighted geometric operator and its application to decision making , 2006, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[6]  L. C. Leung,et al.  On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[8]  G. Facchinetti,et al.  Note on ranking fuzzy triangular numbers , 1998 .

[9]  Thomas O. Boucher,et al.  A consistency test for rational weights in multi-criterion decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons , 1997, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[10]  J. Barzilai Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices , 1997 .

[11]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  On lexicographic goal programming method for generating weights from inconsistent interval comparison matrices , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[12]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Preference simulation and preference programming: robustness issues in priority derivation , 1993 .

[13]  M. Kwiesielewicz The logarithmic least squares and the generalized pseudoinverse in estimating ratios , 1996 .

[14]  Z. S. Xu,et al.  The uncertain OWA operator , 2002, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[15]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Processing interval judgments in the analytic hierarchy process , 1992 .

[16]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[17]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  A goal programming method for obtaining interval weights from an interval comparison matrix , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Ahti Salo,et al.  On fuzzy ratio comparisons in hierarchical decision models , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[19]  Vladislav V. Podinovski,et al.  Interval articulation of superiority and precise elicitation of priorities , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[21]  Dong Cao,et al.  Modifying inconsistent comparison matrix in analytic hierarchy process: A heuristic approach , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[22]  Linda M. Haines,et al.  A statistical approach to the analytic hierarchy process with interval judgements. (I). Distributions on feasible regions , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  A probabilistic study of preference structures in the analytic hierarchy process with interval judgments , 1993 .

[24]  Ludmil Mikhailov,et al.  Fuzzy analytical approach to partnership selection in formation of virtual enterprises , 2002 .

[25]  Ludmil Mikhailov,et al.  A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Tapan Kumar Pal,et al.  On comparing interval numbers , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  OWA aggregation over a continuous interval argument with applications to decision making , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[28]  M. P. Biswal,et al.  Preference programming and inconsistent interval judgments , 1997 .

[29]  X. Zeshui,et al.  A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Ami Arbel,et al.  Approximate articulation of preference and priority derivation , 1989 .

[32]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[33]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons , 1995 .

[34]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Note on “Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations” , 2008 .

[35]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Interval weight generation approaches based on consistency test and interval comparison matrices , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[36]  Moshe Kress,et al.  Approximate articulation of preference and priority derivation — a comment , 1991 .