Validation of NEPTUNE-CFD Two-Phase Flow Models Using Experimental Data

This paper deals with the validation of the two-phase flow models of the CFD code NEPTUNEC-CFD using experimental data provided by the OECD BWR BFBT and PSBT Benchmark. Since the two-phase models of CFD codes are extensively being improved, the validation is a key step for the acceptability of such codes. The validation work is performed in the frame of the European NURISP Project and it was focused on the steady state and transient void fraction tests. The influence of different NEPTUNE-CFD model parameters on the void fraction prediction is investigated and discussed in detail. Due to the coupling of heat conduction solver SYRTHES with NEPTUNE-CFD, the description of the coupled fluid dynamics and heat transfer between the fuel rod and the fluid is improved significantly. The averaged void fraction predicted by NEPTUNE-CFD for selected PSBT and BFBT tests is in good agreement with the experimental data. Finally, areas for future improvements of the NEPTUNE-CFD code were identified, too.

[1]  Antoine Guelfi,et al.  NEPTUNE: A New Software Platform for Advanced Nuclear Thermal Hydraulics , 2007 .

[2]  Hidesada Tamai,et al.  Transverse migration of single bubbles in simple shear flows , 2002 .

[3]  N. Zuber,et al.  Drag coefficient and relative velocity in bubbly, droplet or particulate flows , 1979 .

[4]  H. C. Ünal,et al.  Maximum bubble diameter, maximum bubble-growth time and bubble-growth rate during the subcooled nucleate flow boiling of water up to 17.7 MN/m2 , 1976 .

[5]  E. Krepper,et al.  CFD Analysis of a Void Distribution Benchmark of the NUPEC PSBT Tests: Model Calibration and Influence of Turbulence Modelling , 2012 .

[6]  Michel Lance,et al.  PHASE DISTRIBUTION PHENOMENA AND WALL EFFECTS IN BUBBLY TWO-PHASE FLOWS , 1994 .

[7]  M. Glück,et al.  Validation of the sub-channel code F-COBRA-TF: Part II. Recalculation of void measurements , 2008 .

[8]  Mamoru Ishii,et al.  One-group interfacial area transport in vertical bubbly flow , 1998 .

[9]  N. Zuber.  ON THE DISPERSED TWO-PHASE FLOW IN THE LAMINAR FLOW REGIME. , 1964 .

[10]  Wei Yao,et al.  Volumetric interfacial area prediction in upward bubbly two-phase flow , 2004 .

[11]  Michael Z. Podowski,et al.  MULTIDIMENSIONAL EFFECTS IN FORCED CONVECTION SUBCOOLED BOILING , 1990 .

[12]  T. R. Auton,et al.  The lift force on a spherical body in a rotational flow , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  Lawrence E. Hochreiter,et al.  NEA NUCLEAR SCIENCE COMMITTEE NEA COMMITTEE ON SAFETY OF NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS NUPEC BWR FULL-SIZE FINE-MESH BUNDLE TEST (BFBT) BENCHMARK Volume I: Specifications , 2005 .

[14]  Mamoru Ishii.  TWO-FLUID MODEL FOR TWO-PHASE FLOW , 1987 .

[15]  J. Weisman,et al.  Prediction of critical heat flux in flow boiling at low qualities , 1983 .

[16]  Y. Hsu.  On the Size Range of Active Nucleation Cavities on a Heating Surface , 1962 .