Brief alcohol intervention with college student drinkers: face-to-face versus computerized feedback.

Research has demonstrated that brief interventions featuring personalized feedback can be used to decrease alcohol use among heavy-drinking college students. The current study investigated the efficacy of face-to-face and computer delivered interventions relative to an assessment-only control condition. The content of the personalized feedback was identical across the face-to-face and computerized conditions. There were 84 at-risk students assessed before, and 4 weeks after, the delivery of the interventions. The results suggest that both face-to-face and computerized interventions were equally successful in reducing the quantity and frequency of alcohol consumption, and that both interventions were more effective than the control condition. Participants also rated both interventions as acceptable, although the face-to-face intervention was given a more favorable rating. These initial results suggest that computerized interventions can be used to efficiently reduce alcohol use among college students. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).

[1]  W. Miller,et al.  Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change. , 2002 .

[2]  Kate B. Carey,et al.  Computer-based interventions for college drinking: a qualitative review. , 2008, Addictive behaviors.

[3]  M. Sanchez-Craig,et al.  Superior outcome of females over males after brief treatment for the reduction of heavy drinking. , 1989, British journal of addiction.

[4]  C. Werch,et al.  Feasibility and Efficacy of a Binge Drinking Prevention Intervention for College Students Delivered via the Internet Versus Postal Mail , 2005, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[5]  M. Larimer,et al.  Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students. , 1991, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[6]  W. Miller,et al.  Effects of Normative Feedback on Consumption among Heavy Drinking College Students , 1995, Journal of drug education.

[7]  M. Sliwinski,et al.  Mailed personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for at-risk college drinkers. , 2002, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[8]  Stacey Kramer,et al.  The doctor will see you now. Looking to cut costs and improve care, providers are turning to telehealth. , 2007, Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems.

[9]  W. Miller,et al.  Long-term follow-up of behavioral self-control training. , 1992, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[10]  S. Walters.  In Praise of Feedback: An Effective Intervention for College Students Who Are Heavy Drinkers , 2000, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[11]  M. Martens,et al.  Implementing a screening and brief intervention for high-risk drinking in university-based health and mental health care settings: reductions in alcohol use and correlates of success. , 2007, Addictive behaviors.

[12]  An experimental test of three methods of alcohol risk reduction with young adults. , 1992 .

[13]  T. O'hare,et al.  Drinking in college: consumption patterns, problems, sex differences and legal drinking age. , 1990, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[14]  D. Wacker,et al.  Using telemedicine to conduct behavioral assessments. , 2006, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[15]  L. Dimeff,et al.  Computer-enhanced primary care practitioner advice for high-risk college drinkers in a student primary health-care setting , 2000 .

[16]  H. Wechsler,et al.  College Binge Drinking in the 1990s: A Continuing Problem Results of the Harvard School of Public Health 1999 College Alcohol Study , 2000, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[17]  Stephen Rollnick,et al.  Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change, 2nd Edition , 2002 .

[18]  Kypros Kypri,et al.  Web-based screening and brief intervention for hazardous drinking: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. , 2004, Addiction.

[19]  J. Cunningham,et al.  Impact of normative feedback on problem drinkers: a small-area population study. , 2001, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[20]  Mark Rouncefield,et al.  `You've got to take them seriously': meeting information needs in mental healthcare , 2007, Health Informatics J..

[21]  M. Larimer,et al.  Being controlled by normative influences: self-determination as a moderator of a normative feedback alcohol intervention. , 2006, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[22]  Scott T Walters,et al.  Wired for wellness: e-interventions for addressing college drinking. , 2005, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[23]  R. Hester.  Behavioral self-control training. , 1995 .

[24]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  GPOWER: A general power analysis program , 1996 .

[25]  Joseph H. Miller,et al.  Reducing Alcohol Use in College Students: A Controlled Trial of Two Brief Interventions , 2000, Journal of drug education.

[26]  Clayton Neighbors,et al.  Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. , 2004, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[27]  Social determinants of alcohol consumption: the effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. , 1985, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[28]  K. Fromme,et al.  Outcome Expectancies and Risk-Taking Behavior , 2004, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[29]  K. Carey,et al.  Developing discrepancy within self-regulation theory: use of personalized normative feedback and personal strivings with heavy-drinking college students. , 2004, Addictive behaviors.

[30]  Ralph Hingson,et al.  Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24: changes from 1998 to 2001. , 2005, Annual review of public health.

[31]  S. Meier.  An Exploratory Study of a Computer-Assisted Alcohol Education Program , 1988 .

[32]  Amber M. Henslee,et al.  Using National Alcohol Screening Day to Deliver Personalized Feedback: A Pilot Study , 2006, Journal of drug education.

[33]  H Wechsler,et al.  Correlates of college student binge drinking. , 1995, American journal of public health.

[34]  R. Vuchinich,et al.  A comparison of personalized feedback for college student drinkers delivered with and without a motivational interview. , 2004, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[35]  P. Monti,et al.  Efficacy of counselor vs. computer-delivered intervention with mandated college students. , 2007, Addictive behaviors.

[36]  G A Marlatt,et al.  Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: results from a 2-year follow-up assessment. , 1998, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[37]  Scott T Walters,et al.  Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: what, why and for whom? , 2005, Addictive behaviors.

[38]  W. Miller,et al.  Matching Problem Drinkers With Optimal Treatments , 1986 .

[39]  Jane Metrik,et al.  Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: is there a difference between internet-based assessment and traditional methods? , 2002, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[40]  Patrick M. O'Malley,et al.  Monitoring the Future National Results on Adolescent Drug Use: Overview of Key Findings, 2004. , 2003 .

[41]  Kristine H. Luce,et al.  Computer- and Internet-Based Psychotherapy Interventions , 2003 .

[42]  S. Cantor,et al.  The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as a screen for at-risk drinking in primary care patients of different racial/ethnic backgrounds. , 1997, Addiction.

[43]  H. Wechsler,et al.  Health and behavioral consequences of binge drinking in college. A national survey of students at 140 campuses. , 1994, JAMA.

[44]  Kypros Kypri,et al.  Acceptability of various brief intervention approaches for hazardous drinking among university students. , 2003, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[45]  Scott T. Walters,et al.  A Controlled Trial of Web-Based Feedback for Heavy Drinking College Students , 2007, Prevention Science.

[46]  K. Barry,et al.  The alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) in a college sample. , 1991, The International journal of the addictions.

[47]  K. Carey,et al.  Brief motivational interventions for heavy college drinkers: A randomized controlled trial. , 2006, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[48]  K. Carey,et al.  Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers. , 2000, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[49]  N. Heather,et al.  Motivational interviewing: Is it all our clients need? , 2005 .

[50]  H. White,et al.  Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking. , 1989, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[51]  R. Vuchinich,et al.  Relative efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers. , 2001, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[52]  C D Emrick,et al.  A review of psychologically oriented treatment of alcoholism. II. The relative effectiveness of different treatment approaches and the effectiveness of treatment versus no treatment. , 1975, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[53]  K. Lovell,et al.  Telephone administered cognitive behaviour therapy for treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.