Applying the Wizard of Oz Technique to the Study of Multimodal Systems

The Wizard of Oz (WOz) technique is an experimental evaluation mechanism. It allows the observation of a user operating an apparently fully functioning system whose missing services are supplemented by a hidden wizard. From our analysis of existing WOz systems, we observe that this technique has primarily been used to study natural language interfaces. With recent advances in interactive media, multimodal user interfaces are becoming popular but our current understanding on how to design such systems is still primitive. In the absence of generalizable theories and models, the WOz technique is an appropriate approach to the identification of sound design solutions. We show how the WOz technique can be extended to the analysis of multimodal interfaces and we formulate a set of requirements for a generic multimodal WOz platform. The Neimo system is presented as an illustration of our early experience in the development of such platforms.

[1]  Joëlle Coutaz,et al.  Towards automatic evaluation of multimodal user interfaces , 1993, IUI '93.

[2]  Dan Diaper,et al.  The Wizard's Apprentice: a program to help analyse natural language dialogues , 1990 .

[3]  Cathleen Wharton,et al.  Testing a walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces , 1990, CHI '90.

[4]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication , 1992, CHI.

[5]  Jeffrey J. Hendrickson,et al.  Integrated data capture and analysis tools for research and testing on graphical user interfaces , 1992, CHI.

[6]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Prototyping an intelligent agent through Wizard of Oz , 1993, INTERCHI.

[7]  Antonio C. Siochi,et al.  A study of computer-supported user interface evaluation using maximal repeating pattern analysis , 1991, CHI.

[8]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  User studies and the design of Natural Language Systems , 1989, EACL.

[9]  Joëlle Coutaz,et al.  Multimodal Systems: Aspects of Events Fusion and a Taxonomy , 1992, IFIP Congress.

[10]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[11]  M. Turk,et al.  Eigenfaces for Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Arne Jönsson,et al.  Talking to a Computer Is Not like Talking to Your Best Friend , 1988, SCAI.

[13]  L. Frank Baum Le magicien d'Oz , 2018 .

[14]  Raymonde Guindon,et al.  Grammatical and Ungrammatical Structures in User-Adviser Dialogues= Evidence for Sufficiency of Restricted Languages in Natural Language Interfaces to Advisory Systems , 1987, ACL.

[15]  Jonas Löwgren,et al.  A knowledge-based tool for user interface evaluation and its integration in a UIMS , 1990, INTERACT.

[16]  Gn Gilbert,et al.  The value of simulation data , 1992 .

[17]  Alexander G. Hauptmann,et al.  Speech and gestures for graphic image manipulation , 1989, CHI '89.

[18]  Arne Jönsson,et al.  Empirical Studies Of Discourse Representations For Natural Language Interfaces , 1989, EACL.

[19]  Philip J. Barnard,et al.  Cognitive resources and the learning of human-computer dialogs , 1987 .

[20]  Arne Jönsson,et al.  Wizard of Oz studies: why and how , 1993, IUI '93.