Overview of early response assessment in lymphoma with FDG-PET

Early assessment of response to chemotherapy with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is becoming a routine part of management in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and histologically aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Changes in FDG uptake can occur soon after the initiation of therapy and they precede changes in tumour volume. Recent studies in uniform populations of aggressive lymphomas (predominantly diffuse large B cell lymphomas) and HL have clarified the value of early response assessment with PET. These trials show that PET imaging after 2–3 chemotherapy cycles is far superior to CT-based imaging in predicting progression-free survival and can be at least as reliable as definitive response assessment at the end of therapy. This information is of great potential value to patients, but oncologists should be cautious in the use of early PET response in determining choice of therapy until some critical questions are answered. These include: When is the best time to use PET for response assessment? What is the best methodology, visual or quantitative? (For HL at least, visual reading appears superior to an SUV-based assessment). Can early responders be cured with less intensive therapy? Will survival be better for patients treated more intensively because they have a poor interim metabolic response? In the future, early PET will be crucial in developing response-adapted therapy but without further carefully designed clinical trials, oncologists will remain uncertain how best to use this new information.

[1]  Klemens Scheidhauer,et al.  Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Martin Hutchings,et al.  FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2006, Blood.

[3]  Otto S Hoekstra,et al.  Prognostic relevance of response evaluation using [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  R. Fisher,et al.  New treatment options have changed the survival of patients with follicular lymphoma. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  D. Maloney Immunotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  M. O'Doherty,et al.  FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  R. Hustinx,et al.  Positron emission tomography imaging for lymphoma , 2005, Current opinion in oncology.

[8]  Emmanuel Itti,et al.  [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcome. , 2005, Blood.

[9]  V. Diehl,et al.  High-dose sequential chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in relapsed and refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a multicenter phase II study. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[10]  Y. Erdi,et al.  Intensity of 18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography distinguishes between indolent and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  N. Mikhaeel,et al.  Prognostic value of interim FDG-PET after two or three cycles of chemotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  J. Yahalom,et al.  Transformation in the use of radiation therapy of Hodgkin lymphoma: New concepts and indications lead to modern field design and are assisted by PET imaging and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) , 2005, European journal of haematology. Supplementum.

[13]  M. M. Mac Manus,et al.  Initial staging of lymphoma with positron emission tomography and computed tomography. , 2005, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[14]  J. Raemaekers,et al.  The EORTC strategy in the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma , 2005, European journal of haematology. Supplementum.

[15]  P. Zinzani Lymphoma: diagnosis, staging, natural history, and treatment strategies. , 2005, Seminars in oncology.

[16]  山根 登茂彦 Decreased 18F-FDG uptake 1 day after initiation of chemotherapy for malignant lymphomas , 2005 .

[17]  K. Miles,et al.  Blood flow–metabolic relationships are dependent on tumour size in non-small cell lung cancer: a study using quantitative contrast-enhanced computer tomography and positron emission tomography , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  M. Heldmann,et al.  Contribution of PET imaging to the initial staging and prognosis of patients with Hodgkin's disease. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[19]  S. Ito,et al.  Decreased 18F-FDG uptake 1 day after initiation of chemotherapy for malignant lymphomas. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  L. Specht,et al.  FDG-PET in the clinical management of Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2004, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[21]  J. Richter,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography Using 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose for the Evaluation of Residual Hodgkin's Disease Mediastinal Masses , 2004, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[22]  Thomas F Hany,et al.  Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin disease: coregistered FDG PET and CT at staging and restaging--do we need contrast-enhanced CT? , 2004, Radiology.

[23]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Predictive role of positron emission tomography (PET) in the outcome of lymphoma patients , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[24]  B. Beuthien-Baumann,et al.  Substantial impact of FDG PET imaging on the therapy decision in patients with early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[25]  A. D. Van den Abbeele,et al.  FDG-PET is Superior to Gallium Scintigraphy in Staging and More Sensitive in the Follow-up of Patients with de novo Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Blinded Comparison , 2004, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[26]  A. Lammertsma,et al.  18FDG positron emission tomography versus 67Ga scintigraphy as prognostic test during chemotherapy for non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma , 2003, British journal of haematology.

[27]  E. Vellenga,et al.  Predictive value of early 18F‐fluoro‐deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in chemosensitive relapsed lymphoma , 2003, British journal of haematology.

[28]  M. Phelps,et al.  Value of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for predicting the clinical outcome of patients with aggressive lymphoma prior to and after autologous stem-cell transplantation. , 2003, Chest.

[29]  F. Bénard,et al.  Prognostic value of PET using 18F-FDG in Hodgkin's disease for posttreatment evaluation. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  M. Tomas,et al.  18F-FDG PET versus CT for evaluating the spleen during initial staging of lymphoma. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[31]  R. Hicks,et al.  Frequent impact of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on the staging and management of patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2003, Clinical lymphoma.

[32]  Danny Rischin,et al.  Positron emission tomography is superior to computed tomography scanning for response-assessment after radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  O. Israel,et al.  Gallium-67 scintigraphy: a cornerstone in functional imaging of lymphoma , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[34]  J. Eary,et al.  [18F]FMISO and [18F]FDG PET imaging in soft tissue sarcomas: correlation of hypoxia, metabolism and VEGF expression , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[35]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  [18F]FDG PET monitoring of tumour response to chemotherapy: does [18F]FDG uptake correlate with the viable tumour cell fraction? , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[36]  E. Yoshikawa,et al.  Early therapy monitoring with FDG-PET in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and Hodgkin’s lymphoma , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[37]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  Methods to monitor response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with 18F-FDG PET. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[38]  P. Dupont,et al.  Early restaging positron emission tomography with ( 18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[39]  J. Leonard,et al.  PET predicts prognosis after 1 cycle of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[40]  V. Diehl,et al.  Early response to chemotherapy: a surrogate for final outcome of Hodgkin's disease patients that should influence initial treatment length and intensity? , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[41]  R. Fisher,et al.  Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, gallium-67 scintigraphy, and conventional staging for Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2002, The American journal of medicine.

[42]  M. Glabbeke,et al.  The achievements of the EORTC Lymphoma Group. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[43]  E. Berg,et al.  World Health Organization Classification of Tumours , 2002 .

[44]  Pierre Morel,et al.  CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[45]  B Beuthien-Baumann,et al.  Prognostic value of positron emission tomography in the evaluation of post‐treatment residual mass in patients with Hodgkin's disease and non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma , 2001, British journal of haematology.

[46]  U. Cremerius,et al.  Prognostic significance of positron emission tomography using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in patients treated for malignant lymphoma , 2001, Nuklearmedizin.

[47]  P. Dupont,et al.  Prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) after first-line chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is [18F]FDG-PET a valid alternative to conventional diagnostic methods? , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[48]  A. Lammertsma,et al.  Monitoring response to therapy in cancer using [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose and positron emission tomography: an overview of different analytical methods , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[49]  Olker,et al.  A PROGNOSTIC SCORE FOR ADVANCED HODGKIN ’ S DISEASE , 2000 .

[50]  S. Hain,et al.  18-FDG-PET for the assessment of residual masses on CT following treatment of lymphomas. , 2000, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[51]  K. Herholz,et al.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. , 1999, European journal of cancer.

[52]  G. Jerusalem,et al.  Whole-body positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for posttreatment evaluation in Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has higher diagnostic and prognostic value than classical computed tomography scan imaging. , 1999, Blood.

[53]  J. Armitage,et al.  Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[54]  J. Armitage,et al.  A prognostic score for advanced Hodgkin's disease. International Prognostic Factors Project on Advanced Hodgkin's Disease. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[55]  M. Greco,et al.  Association between [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and postoperative histopathology, hormone receptor status, thymidine labelling index and p53 in primary breast cancer: a preliminary observation , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[56]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Positron emission tomography in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: assessment of chemotherapy with fluorodeoxyglucose. , 1998, Blood.

[57]  M. M. Mac Manus,et al.  Is radiotherapy curative for stage I and II low-grade follicular lymphoma? Results of a long-term follow-up study of patients treated at Stanford University. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[58]  B. Glimelius,et al.  Predicting malignancy grade with PET in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[59]  Emili Montserrat,et al.  A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[60]  L G Strauss,et al.  The applications of PET in clinical oncology. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[61]  M Tubiana,et al.  Report of a committee convened to discuss the evaluation and staging of patients with Hodgkin's disease: Cotswolds meeting. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.