The Antinomies of Collective Political Trauma: A Pre‐Theory

Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin's assassination has less of a lasting impact on the Israeli public's political values, beliefs and attitudes than might have been anticipated from the magnitude of the event and intensity of the immediate responses. Why did the assassination have such a short-lived effect? This article considers the puzzle as a specific case of the broader phenomenon of collective political trauma and its consequences for values, beliefs and attitudes held by the mass public toward issues that it associates with the traumatic event. The article offers six deductively inferred hypotheses that describe, explain and link affective, cognitive and behavioral aspects of collectively experienced trauma. These hypotheses form a pre-theory explaining the perseverence of core political cognitions, even in the face of a considerable challenge to their validity and relevance.

[1]  D. Spiegel,et al.  Dissociative reactions to the San Francisco Bay Area earthquake of 1989. , 1993, The American journal of psychiatry.

[2]  P. Pollock.  Issues, Values, and Critical Moments: Did "Magic" Johnson Transform Public Opinion on AIDS? , 1994 .

[3]  P. Suedfeld.  Reactions to Societal Trauma: Distress and/or Eustress , 1997 .

[4]  B. Rothbaum,et al.  Uncontrollability and unpredictability in post-traumatic stress disorder: an animal model. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  Joseph E LeDoux.  The emotional brain , 1996 .

[6]  Edna B. Foa,et al.  The impact of fear activation and anger on the efficacy of exposure treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder. , 1995 .

[7]  B. Rothbaum,et al.  Behavioral/cognitive conceptualizations of post-traumatic stress disorder , 1989 .

[8]  D. Granberg,et al.  Attitudes Towards a Fallen Leader: Evaluations of Olof Palme Before and After the Assassination , 1996, British Journal of Political Science.

[9]  Thomas E. Drabek,et al.  A new species of trouble : explorations in disaster, trauma, and community , 1994 .

[10]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. , 1975 .

[11]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics , 1989 .

[12]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social cognition, 2nd ed. , 1991 .

[13]  A. Kruglanski.  Lay epistemics and human knowledge , 1989 .

[14]  D. R. Lehman,et al.  Counterfactual thinking and coping with traumatic life events. , 1995 .

[15]  J. Baron,et al.  Outcome bias in decision evaluation. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  I. Sarason,et al.  Coping and social support. , 1996 .

[17]  William G. Doty.  Mythography: The Study of Myths and Rituals , 1986 .

[18]  R. Hastie,et al.  Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known. , 1990 .

[19]  A. Raviv,et al.  An Anatomy of Political Beliefs: A Study of Their Centrality, Confidence, Contents, and Epistemic Authority , 1994 .

[20]  A. Arian.  Security Threatened: Surveying Israeli Opinion on Peace and War , 1995 .

[21]  N. ben-yehuda.  Political Assassinations by Jews: A Rhetorical Device for Justice , 1992 .

[22]  T. Dalgleish,et al.  A dual representation theory of posttraumatic stress disorder. , 1996, Psychological review.

[23]  L. Ross,et al.  Perseverance of Social Theories: The Role of Explanation in the Persistence of Discredited Information , 1980 .

[24]  B. E. Moore,et al.  Psychoanalytic terms and concepts. , 1990 .

[25]  Yaacov Y. I. Vertzberger.  The World in Their Minds: Information Processing, Cognition, and Perception in Foreign Policy Decisionmaking , 1990 .

[26]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". , 1996, Psychological review.