Real-world schemata and scene recognition in adults and children

Recognition memory for previously seen multiobject scenes was examined for different types of contextual arrangements between objects in the scenes. It was found that organized scenes with novel but possible interobject relations were recognized more accurately than either organized scenes with familiar interobject relations or unorganized scenes with impossible interobject relations. This finding was obtained for adults, 8- to 10-year-old children, and 5- to 8-year-old children who indicated concrete-operational ability in Piaget’s conservation-of-liquid quantity task. The results were interpreted in conjunction with a two-stage model of scene processing involving the formation of a schema to represent a scene (Stage 1), and the operation of the schema in governing the further processing of detailed information in the scene (Stage 2). It was concluded that preoperational children can form schemata to represent organized scenes (Stage 1), but it is not until the emergence of concrete operations that these schemata become operational with respect to guiding the further processing of information in the scene (Stage 2).

[1]  F. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology , 1932 .

[2]  Howard S. Hock,et al.  Individual differences in the verbal coding of familiar visual stimuli , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[3]  R. E. Parker,et al.  Memory for descriptive and spatial information in complex pictures. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[4]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[5]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reconstruction of arbitrary versus logical sequences by preschool children , 1975 .

[6]  J. Bruner.  On perceptual readiness. , 1957, Psychological review.

[7]  I. Biederman.  Perceiving Real-World Scenes , 1972, Science.

[8]  Irving Biederman,et al.  On processing information from a glance at a scene: some implications for a syntax and semantics of visual processing , 1976, UODIGS '76.

[9]  L. Horowitz,et al.  The child's memory for unitized scenes , 1969 .

[10]  I. Biederman,et al.  Searching for objects in real-world scences. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar , 1976 .

[12]  Alternative processes in the identification of familiar pictures , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[13]  E. Tulving,et al.  Episodic and semantic memory , 1972 .

[14]  N. S. Johnson,et al.  Some of the thousand words a picture is worth. , 1976 .

[15]  H. Hock,et al.  Contextual relations: The influence of familiarity, physical plausibility, and belongingness , 1974 .

[16]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Psychology of the Child , 1969 .

[18]  I. Biederman,et al.  On the information extracted from a glance at a scene. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  J M Mandler,et al.  Recall and recognition of pictures by children as a function of organization and distractor similarity. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Ann L. Brown.  Recognition, Reconstruction, and Recall of Narrative Sequences by Preoperational Children. , 1975 .

[21]  W. Bevan,et al.  The role of context in episodic memory , 1977 .

[22]  R. Brown,et al.  A First Language , 1973 .

[23]  Jean M. Mandler,et al.  Long-Term Memory for Pictures. , 1977 .