Perceptually Induced Distortions in Cognitive Maps

Cities on a map that are directly connected by a route are judged closer than unconnected cities. This route effect has been attributed to memory distortions induced by the integration of map information with high-level knowledge about implications of route connections. However, depicted routes also connect cities visually, thereby creating a single visual object—which implies a perceptual basis of the route effect. In this article we show that the effect does not depend on whether a map is presented as a map or as a meaningless pattern of symbols and lines (Experiment 1), and that the effect occurs even if spatial judgments are made vis-a-vis a permanently visible configuration (Experiment 2). These findings suggest that the distorted spatial representation is a by-product of perceptual organization, not of the integration of abstract knowledge in memory by given organization principles.

[1]  J. Baird,et al.  Semantic and spatial factors in environmental memory , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[2]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Action Related Determinants of Spatial Coding in Perception and Memory , 2000, Spatial Cognition.

[3]  Albert C. Stevens,et al.  Distortions in judged spatial relations , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  T. McNamara Memory's view of space , 1991 .

[5]  R. Wilton Knowledge of Spatial Relations: The Specification of the Information Used in Making Inferences , 1979, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual attention and objects: evidence for hierarchical coding of location. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Wilfried Brauer,et al.  Spatial cognition III: Routes and navigation, human memory and learning, spatial representation and spatial learning , 2003 .

[8]  P. Thorndyke Distance estimation from cognitive maps , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  M. Mascolo,et al.  Effect of semantic clustering on the memory of spatial locations. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[11]  Diane J. Schiano,et al.  Perceptual and conceptual factors in distortions in memory for graphs and maps. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  R. Maki Categorization and distance effects with spatial linear orders. , 1981 .

[13]  Wilfried Brauer,et al.  Spatial Cognition II, Integrating Abstract Theories, Empirical Studies, Formal Methods, and Practical Applications , 2000 .

[14]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Acquisition of Cognitive Aspect Maps , 2003, Spatial Cognition.

[15]  B Hommel,et al.  Hierarchical coding in the perception and memory of spatial layouts , 2000, Psychological research.

[16]  B. Tversky Spatial mental models , 1991 .

[17]  B. Tversky Distortions in memory for maps , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  T. McNamara Mental representations of spatial relations , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  S. Coren,et al.  Principles of perceptual organization and spatial distortion: the gestalt illusions. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  David E. Meyer,et al.  Interactions between Object and Space Systems Revealed through Neuropsychology , 1993 .

[21]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  The mental representation of knowledge acquired from maps. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.