Knowledge-sharing in an online community of health-care professionals

Purpose – The purposes of this study are twofold: (1) to examine the types of activity that nurses undertake on an online community of practice (APN-l) as well as the types of knowledge that nurses share with one another and (2) to examine the factors that sustain knowledge sharing among the nurses from their local perspectives.Design/methodology/approach – An in-depth case study with mixed methods was adopted to obtain rich and naturalistic data including online observations of the messages posted in APN-l, interviews with twenty-seven members of APN-l, and content analysis of online messages. Findings – The most common type of activity performed by members of APN-l was “Knowledge sharing,” followed by “Solicitation.” Regarding the types of knowledge shared, the most common were “Institutional practice” and “Personal opinion.” The factors that have helped sustain knowledge sharing within the online community of practice include: (1) a self-selection, (2) validation of one’s practice with others who share a similar working situation, (3) a need to gain better understanding of current knowledge and best practices in the field, (4) a noncompetitive environment, (5) the asynchronous nature of the online communication medium, and (6) the role of the listserv moderator.Originality/value – This study contributes to the growing knowledge base of communities of practice that span organizational boundary. Administrators can use the coding schema developed in this study to gauge current activities of existing online communities of practice. Additionally, they can use the six factors to sustain knowledge sharing community for fostering new/existing online communities of practice.

[1]  James A. Levin,et al.  Real education in non-real time: The use of electronic message systems for instruction , 1983 .

[2]  Noriko Hara,et al.  Social construction of knowledge in professional communities of practice: Tales in courtrooms , 2000 .

[3]  Xin Li,et al.  Using Social Psychology to Motivate Contributions to Online Communities , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[4]  D. Auerbach,et al.  Implications of an aging registered nurse workforce. , 2000, JAMA.

[5]  Christopher M. Johnson,et al.  Communities of Practice , 2001 .

[6]  John G. Hedberg,et al.  A framework for fostering a community of practice: scaffolding learners through an evolving continuum , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[7]  D C Angus,et al.  Caring for the critically ill patient. Current and projected workforce requirements for care of the critically ill and patients with pulmonary disease: can we meet the requirements of an aging population? , 2000, JAMA.

[8]  S. Barab,et al.  Designing system dualities: Characterizing an online professional development community , 2004 .

[9]  Gustav W. Friedrich,et al.  Computer-mediated communication in small group decisional stages , 1991 .

[10]  E. Wenger.  Supporting communities of practice A survey of community-oriented technologies , 2002 .

[11]  Noriko Hara.  Information technology support for communities of practice: How public defenders learn about winning and losing in court , 2007 .

[12]  Andrew Cox,et al.  What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..

[13]  Bette Gray.  Informal Learning in an Online Community of Practice. , 2004 .

[14]  Fiona Stewart,et al.  Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online , 2000 .

[15]  Anthony K.P. Wensley,et al.  Chapter 5 – Tools for Knowledge Management , 2000 .

[16]  N. Denzin.  Cybertalk and the Method of Instances , 1999 .

[17]  Alexander Ardichvili,et al.  Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[18]  Loren G. Terveen,et al.  The dynamics of mass interaction , 1998, CSCW '98.

[19]  Paul H. J. Hendriks,et al.  Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing , 1999 .

[20]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[21]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[22]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[23]  Rob Kling,et al.  Informational Environments: Organizational Contexts of Online Information Use , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[24]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Computer Networks and Scientific Work , 1996 .

[25]  Scott L. Althaus.  Please Scroll down for Article Communication Education Computer-mediated Communication in the University Classroom: an Experiment with On-line Discussions , 2022 .

[26]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving , 2001 .

[27]  S. Newell,et al.  The Role of Networks In the Diffusion of Technological Innovation , 1996 .

[28]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[29]  Thomas A. Schwandt.  Qualitative Inquiry: A Dictionary of Terms , 1997 .

[30]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[31]  D. Wellman,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .

[32]  Linda Harasim,et al.  Teaching and Learning On-Line: Issues in Computer-Mediated Graduate Courses , 2009 .

[33]  Volker Wulf,et al.  IT to support knowledge sharing in communities, towards a social capital analysis , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[34]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[35]  D. Leonard,et al.  The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation , 1998 .

[36]  D. Sackett.  Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM , 2018 .

[37]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Studying Knowledge Management in Information Systems Resarch: Discourses and Theoretical Assumptions , 2002, MIS Q..

[38]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[39]  John Biggam,et al.  Defining knowledge: an epistemological foundation for knowledge management , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[40]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[41]  J. Yi,et al.  Supporting business by facilitating organizatoinal learning and knowledge creation in the MOT community of practice (CoP) , 2001 .

[42]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[43]  Rebecca Scheckler,et al.  Designing System Dualities: Building Web-Based Community , 2003, Inf. Soc..

[44]  Line Dubé,et al.  The impact of structuring characteristics on the launching of virtual communities of practice , 2005 .

[45]  Eric L. Lesser,et al.  Communities of practice and organizational performance , 2001, IBM Syst. J..

[46]  Fred D. Davis.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[47]  B. Nonnecke,et al.  WHY LURKERS LURK , 2001 .

[48]  Gail Y. Hendler.  Why Evidence-Based Medicine Matters to Patients , 2004 .

[49]  Dennis F. Kibler,et al.  Toward a theory of cultural transparency: elements of a social discourse of the visible and the invisible , 1990 .

[50]  Robert M. Mason,et al.  On the Nature of Knowledge: Rethinking Popular Assumptions , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[51]  G. Krogh.  Care in Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[52]  E. Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier , 2000 .

[53]  J. Orr.  Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job , 1998 .

[54]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[55]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[56]  B. F. Sharf.  Beyond Netiquette: The Ethics of Doing Naturalistic Discourse Research on the Internet , 1999 .

[57]  Elisabeth Davenport.  Knowledge management issues for online organisations: 'communities of practice' as an exploratory framework , 2001, J. Documentation.

[58]  Eun-Ok Baek,et al.  A Study of Dynamic Design Dualities in a Web-Supported Community of Practice for Teachers , 2005, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[59]  S. D. N. Cook,et al.  Culture and Organizational Learning , 1993 .

[60]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[61]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups , 1996, MIS Q..

[62]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[63]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[64]  Donald C. Bryant,et al.  Content Analysis of Communications , 1968 .

[65]  Paul Hildreth,et al.  Communities of practice in the distributed international environment , 2000, J. Knowl. Manag..