Evidence of Payments for Ecosystem Services as a mechanism for supporting biodiversity conservation and rural livelihoods

Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) represent a mechanism for promoting sustainable management of ecosystem services, and can also be useful for supporting rural development. However, few studies have demonstrated quantitatively the benefits for biodiversity and rural communities resulting from PES. In this paper we review four initiatives in Guatemala, Cambodia, and Tanzania that were designed to support the conservation of biodiversity through the use of community-based PES. Each case study documents the utility of PES for conserving biodiversity and enhancing rural livelihoods and, from these examples, we distill general lessons learned about the use of PES for conserving biodiversity and supporting poverty reduction in rural areas of tropical, developing countries.

[1]  K. Redford,et al.  Payment for Ecosystem Services and the Challenge of Saving Nature , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[2]  S. Wunder,et al.  Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues , 2008 .

[3]  M. Honzák,et al.  Targeting and implementing payments for ecosystem services: Opportunities for bundling biodiversity conservation with carbon and water services in Madagascar , 2010 .

[4]  Muhammad Ibrahim,et al.  Paying for Biodiversity Conservation Services , 2005 .

[5]  S. Wunder,et al.  Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries , 2008 .

[6]  V. Ramos,et al.  Multiple forest use through commercial sport hunting: lessons from a community-based model from the Petén, Guatemala , 2012 .

[7]  Julia P. G. Jones,et al.  Impact of a Community‐Based Payment for Environmental Services Intervention on Forest Use in Menabe, Madagascar , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[8]  P. Ferraro.  Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services , 2008 .

[9]  H. Sachedina.  Wildlife is our oil : conservation, livelihoods and NGOs in the Tarangire ecosystem, Tanzania , 2008 .

[10]  R. Simpson,et al.  Paying for the conservation of endangered ecosystems: a comparison of direct and indirect approaches , 1996, Environment and Development Economics.

[11]  Paul J. Ferraro,et al.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Conservation Payments , 2002, Land Economics.

[12]  H. Sachedina.  Conservation, land rights and livelihoods in the Tarangire ecosystem of Tanzania: Increasing incentives for non-conservation compatible land use change through conservation policy , 2006 .

[13]  Lisa Petheram,et al.  Listening to locals on payments for environmental services. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[14]  Berry J. Brosi,et al.  Integrating conservation and development in the field: implementing ecosystem service projects , 2009 .

[15]  F. Nelson,et al.  Payments for Ecosystem Services as a Framework for Community‐Based Conservation in Northern Tanzania , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[16]  J. Farley,et al.  Determining when payments are an effective policy approach to ecosystem service provision , 2010 .

[17]  E. Corbera,et al.  Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism , 2010 .

[18]  J. Kahurananga.  Population estimates, densities and biomass of large herbivores in Simanjiro Plains, Northern Tanzania , 1981 .

[19]  R. Greiner,et al.  More than money for conservation: Exploring social co-benefits from PES schemes , 2013 .

[20]  C. Kampichler,et al.  Indication of a species in an extinction vortex: The ocellated turkey on the Yucatan peninsula, Mexico , 2010 .

[21]  J. Kerr.  Watershed Development, Environmental Services, and Poverty Alleviation in India , 2002 .

[22]  S. Wunder.  Payments for environmental services : Some nuts and bolts , 2022 .

[23]  E. Milner‐Gulland,et al.  Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions:Comparison of three programs from Cambodia? , 2010 .

[24]  S. Wunder,et al.  Payments for Ecosystem Services: A New Way of Conserving Biodiversity in Forests , 2009 .

[25]  K. M. Homewood,et al.  Maasailand Ecology: Pastoralist Development and Wildlife Conservation in Ngorongoro, Tanzania , 1993 .

[26]  N. Landell-Mills,et al.  Silver bullet or fools' gold? A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impact on the poor. , 2002 .

[27]  Can nature tourism help finance protected areas in the Congo Basin , 1999 .

[28]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[29]  Ramsay Wright,et al.  FORTY-SEVENTH SUPPLEMENT TO THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION CHECK-LIST OF NORTH AMERICAN BIRDS , 2006 .

[30]  B. Fisher.  Poverty, Payments, and Ecosystem Services in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania , 2012 .

[31]  F. Nelson,et al.  Protected areas and community incentives in savannah ecosystems: a case study of Tanzania’s Maasai Steppe , 2010, Oryx.

[32]  Paul J. Ferraro,et al.  Show Me the Money: Do Payments Supply Environmental Services in Developing Countries? , 2010, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[33]  Ina Porras,et al.  How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor?: preliminary Lessons from Latin America , 2005 .