The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing

[1]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Early Parallel Processing of Auditory Word and Voice Information , 2002, NeuroImage.

[2]  Constance M. Clarke.  Perceptual adjustment to foreign-accented English with short term exposure , 2002, INTERSPEECH.

[3]  Kenneth N Stevens,et al.  Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  R. Smits.  Hierarchical categorization of coarticulated phonemes: A theoretical analysis , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  R Smits,et al.  Evidence for hierarchical categorization of coarticulated phonemes. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  S. Goldinger.  Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[7]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Perceptual adjustment to highly compressed speech: effects of talker and rate changes. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  S. Goldinger.  Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  D. Norris.  Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.

[10]  D. Schacter,et al.  Perceptual specificity of auditory priming: implicit memory for voice intonation and fundamental frequency. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Long-term memory in speech perception: Some new findings on talker variability, speaking rate and perceptual learning , 1993, Speech Commun..

[12]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  J. Mehler,et al.  Understanding Compressed Sentences: The Role of Rhythm and Meaning a , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[14]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Speech Perception as a Talker-Contingent Process , 1993, Psychological science.

[15]  V. Mann,et al.  Perceptual order and the effect of vocalic context on fricative perception , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Keith Johnson.  Differential effects Of Speaker and Vowel Variability on Fricative Perception , 1991, Language and speech.

[17]  J. McQueen.  The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: stimulus quality in word-final ambiguity. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Keith Johnson,et al.  The role of perceived speaker identity in F0 normalization of vowels. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[22]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Lexical Representation and Process , 1989, Language.

[23]  D. Klatt.  Review of selected models of speech perception , 1989 .

[24]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  P. Ladefoged.  A note on "Information conveyed by vowels". , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  T. M. Nearey.  Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  S. Greenspan,et al.  Perceptual learning of synthetic speech produced by rule. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  J. Perkell,et al.  Invariance and variability in speech processes , 1987 .

[29]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  D. Scott,et al.  Segmental Phonology and the Perception of Syntactic Structure. , 1984 .

[31]  W. Ganong.  Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Speech perception: a model of acoustic–phonetic analysis and lexical access , 1979 .

[33]  V. Mann,et al.  Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∫]-[s] distinction , 1978 .

[34]  P. Iverson,et al.  Vowel normalization for accent: an investigation of best exemplar locations in northern and southern British English sentences. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Constance M. Clarke,et al.  Processing time effects of short-term exposure to foreign-accented English , 2003 .

[36]  Sonja Lattner.  Neurophysiologische Untersuchungen zur auditorischen Verarbeitung von Stimminformation , 2002 .

[37]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Talker-specific learning in speech perception , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  P K Kuhl,et al.  The encoding of rate and talker information during phonetic perception , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  S. Goldinger,et al.  Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken words. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  J. Kruschke,et al.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. , 1992, Psychological review.

[41]  S. Goldinger,et al.  On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  P. Change.  Some Thoughts on , 1988 .

[44]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Information Conveyed by Vowels , 1957 .