Centrifuge Modeling of Deep Excavations and Their Interaction With Adjacent Buildings

Major cities in the world are experiencing a rapid growth in population while becoming increasingly overcrowded and congested. In recent years, this has created a huge demand for underground infrastructure, which often involves the design of major mass transit tunnel systems; these tunnel systems (underground tunnels and metro stations) are becoming increasingly necessary to construct in very close proximity to existing buildings. The prediction of excavation-induced deformations, therefore, becomes a key issue in the planning and design process for these schemes. However, current design approaches are conservative and often lead to unnecessary concern and expenditure in the design and provision of protective measures. A better understanding of the mechanisms involved in the excavation soil–structure interaction could reduce costs and help avoid potential problems. A series of small-scale model tests was carried out in the geotechnical centrifuge at Cambridge University to investigate the interaction between excavations and model buildings. Excavations (simulated by adopting a novel two-fluid technique) in a “free field” were also undertaken to assess the difference between free-field ground movements and those affected by a stiff model building. A detailed description of the centrifuge models and test procedures is presented in this paper, followed by the presentation of test results that demonstrate the effect of the stiffness of the model building on the excavation-induced displacements.

[1]  P. L. Bransby,et al.  Soil deformations near cantilever sheet pile walls , 1975 .

[2]  William Powrie,et al.  The collapse of diaphragm walls retaining clay , 1987 .

[3]  G. Wayne Clough,et al.  Construction Induced Movements of Insitu Walls , 1990 .

[4]  Mohammed Z.E.B. Elshafie,et al.  Effect of building stiffness on excavation-induced displacements , 2008 .

[5]  C. R. I. Clayton,et al.  Earth Pressure and Earth-Retaining Structures, Second Edition , 1993 .

[6]  C J Padfield,et al.  DESIGN OF RETAINING WALLS EMBEDDED IN STIFF CLAY , 1984 .

[7]  David M. Potts,et al.  The response of surface structures to tunnel construction , 2006 .

[8]  Bengt B. Broms,et al.  Behaviour of foundations and structures , 1977 .

[9]  W. A. Take,et al.  Soil deformation measurement using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and photogrammetry , 2003 .

[10]  Finian Seng Chin Tan Centrifuge and theoretical modelling of conical footings on sand , 1990 .

[11]  Jonathan Knappett,et al.  Calibration and use of a new automatic sand pourer , 2006 .

[12]  Andrew Martin McNamara Influence of heave reducing piles on ground movements around excavations , 2001 .

[13]  David M. Potts,et al.  A STRUCTURE'S INFLUENCE ON TUNNELLING-INDUCED GROUND MOVEMENTS. , 1997 .

[14]  Stuart K. Haigh,et al.  A new automatic sand pourer for model preparation at University of Cambridge , 2006 .

[15]  Gjw King,et al.  CENTRIFUGE MODEL STUDIES OF A CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL IN SAND , 1993 .

[16]  S J Boone DATABASE FOR RETAINING WALL AND GROUND MOVEMENT DUE TO DEEP EXCAVATIONS. DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE , 2002 .

[17]  Robert J. Mair,et al.  Research on tunnelling-induced ground movements and their effects on buildings-lessons from the Jubilee Line Extension , 2003 .

[18]  Robert J. Mair,et al.  Prediction of ground movements and assessment of risk of building damage due to bored tunnelling , 1996 .

[19]  David John Richards Centrifuge and numerical modelling of twin-propped retaining walls. , 1995 .