HBT+: an improved code for finding subhaloes and building merger trees in cosmological simulations.

Dark matter subhalos are the remnants of (incomplete) halo mergers. Identifying them and establishing their evolutionary links in the form of merger trees is one of the most important applications of cosmological simulations. The HBT (Hierachical Bound-Tracing) code identifies haloes as they form and tracks their evolution as they merge, simultaneously detecting subhaloes and building their merger trees. Here we present a new implementation of this approach, HBT+ , that is much faster, more user friendly, and more physically complete than the original code. Applying HBT+ to cosmological simulations, we show that both the subhalo mass function and the peak-mass function are well fitted by similar double-Schechter functions. The ratio between the two is highest at the high-mass end, reflecting the resilience of massive subhaloes that experience substantial dynamical friction but limited tidal stripping. The radial distribution of the most-massive subhaloes is more concentrated than the universal radial distribution of lower mass subhaloes. Subhalo finders that work in configuration space tend to underestimate the masses of massive subhaloes, an effect that is stronger in the host centre. This may explain, at least in part, the excess of massive subhaloes in galaxy cluster centres inferred from recent lensing observations. We demonstrate that the peak-mass function is a powerful diagnostic of merger tree defects, and the merger trees constructed using HBT+ do not suffer from the missing or switched links that tend to afflict merger trees constructed from more conventional halo finders. We make the HBT+ code publicly available.

[1]  C. Frenk,et al.  Resolution of the apparent discrepancy between the number of massive subhaloes in Abell 2744 and ΛCDM , 2017, 1708.01400.

[2]  Durham,et al.  Mapping substructure in the HST Frontier Fields cluster lenses and in cosmological simulations , 2017, 1702.04348.

[3]  A. Benson The mass function of unprocessed dark matter haloes and merger tree branching rates , 2016, 1610.01057.

[4]  Heidelberg,et al.  Abell 2744 : too much substructure for ΛCDM? , 2016, 1611.02790.

[5]  R. Massey,et al.  The extraordinary amount of substructure in the Hubble Frontier Fields cluster Abell 2744 , 2016, 1606.04527.

[6]  S. Cole,et al.  A unified model for the spatial and mass distribution of subhaloes , 2015, 1509.02175.

[7]  Frazer R. Pearce,et al.  Sussing merger trees: a proposed merger tree data format , 2015 .

[8]  Frazer R. Pearce,et al.  Major mergers going Notts: challenges for modern halo finders , 2015, 1506.01405.

[9]  V. Springel,et al.  Introducing the Illustris Project: simulating the coevolution of dark and visible matter in the Universe , 2014, 1405.2921.

[10]  F. V. D. Bosch,et al.  Statistics of Dark Matter Substructure: II. Comparison of Model with Simulation Results , 2014, 1403.6835.

[11]  F. V. D. Bosch,et al.  Statistics of dark matter substructure – I. Model and universal fitting functions , 2014, 1403.6827.

[12]  Frazer R. Pearce,et al.  Sussing merger trees: the influence of the halo finder , 2014, 1402.2381.

[13]  S. Cole,et al.  N-body dark matter haloes with simple hierarchical histories , 2013, 1311.6649.

[14]  Fangzhou Jiang,et al.  Generating merger trees for dark matter haloes: a comparison of methods , 2013, 1311.5225.

[15]  S. Cole,et al.  N-body Merger Trees and Halo Properties , 2013 .

[16]  Frazer R. Pearce,et al.  Sussing merger trees: the Merger Trees Comparison Project , 2013, 1307.3577.

[17]  V. Springel,et al.  Scaling relations for galaxy clusters in the Millennium-XXL simulation , 2012, 1203.3216.

[18]  Risa H. Wechsler,et al.  THE ROCKSTAR PHASE-SPACE TEMPORAL HALO FINDER AND THE VELOCITY OFFSETS OF CLUSTER CORES , 2011, 1110.4372.

[19]  Robert J. Thacker,et al.  Peaks above the Maxwellian Sea: a new approach to finding substructures in N-body haloes , 2011, 1107.4289.

[20]  Joel R. Primack,et al.  Halo concentrations in the standard LCDM cosmology , 2011, 1104.5130.

[21]  Michal Maciejewski,et al.  Haloes gone MAD: The Halo-Finder Comparison Project , 2011, 1104.0949.

[22]  Jiaxin Han,et al.  Resolving subhaloes’ lives with the Hierarchical Bound‐Tracing algorithm , 2011, 1103.2099.

[23]  Frazer R. Pearce,et al.  The accuracy of subhalo detection , 2010, 1008.2903.

[24]  A. Klypin,et al.  DARK MATTER HALOS IN THE STANDARD COSMOLOGICAL MODEL: RESULTS FROM THE BOLSHOI SIMULATION , 2010, 1002.3660.

[25]  C. Giocoli,et al.  The substructure hierarchy in dark matter haloes , 2009, 0911.0436.

[26]  H. Mo,et al.  Mass distribution and accretion of sub-halos , 2009, 0908.0301.

[27]  A. Knebe,et al.  Ahf: AMIGA'S HALO FINDER , 2009, 0904.3662.

[28]  Volker Springel,et al.  Resolving cosmic structure formation with the Millennium-II simulation , 2009, 0903.3041.

[29]  V. Springel,et al.  Phase‐space structures – II. Hierarchical Structure Finder , 2008, 0812.0288.

[30]  V. Springel,et al.  Prospects for detecting supersymmetric dark matter in the Galactic halo , 2008, Nature.

[31]  Durham,et al.  The Aquarius Project: the subhaloes of galactic haloes , 2008, 0809.0898.

[32]  Heidelberg,et al.  The population of dark matter subhaloes: mass functions and average mass-loss rates , 2007, 0712.1563.

[33]  C. Frenk,et al.  The Aquarius Project : the subhalos of galactic halos , 2008 .

[34]  Oxford,et al.  Breaking the hierarchy of galaxy formation , 2005, astro-ph/0511338.

[35]  J. Peacock,et al.  Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars , 2005, Nature.

[36]  C. Giocoli,et al.  The mass function and average mass-loss rate of dark matter subhaloes , 2004, astro-ph/0409201.

[37]  S. White,et al.  The subhalo populations of ΛCDM dark haloes , 2004, astro-ph/0404589.

[38]  Padova,et al.  Populating a cluster of galaxies - I. Results at z=0 , 2000, astro-ph/0012055.

[39]  George Lake,et al.  Dark Matter Substructure within Galactic Halos , 1999, astro-ph/9907411.

[40]  Stefan Gottloeber,et al.  Galaxies in N-Body Simulations: Overcoming the Overmerging Problem , 1997, astro-ph/9708191.

[41]  G. Lake,et al.  Dark matter haloes within clusters , 1998, astro-ph/9801192.

[42]  D. Syer,et al.  Survival of substructure within dark matter haloes , 1997, astro-ph/9712222.

[43]  G. Lake,et al.  Resolving the Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos , 1997, astro-ph/9709051.

[44]  S. Cole,et al.  Merger rates in hierarchical models of galaxy formation – II. Comparison with N-body simulations , 1994, astro-ph/9402069.

[45]  G. Efstathiou,et al.  The evolution of large-scale structure in a universe dominated by cold dark matter , 1985 .