The influence of contextual elements, actors’ frames of reference, and technology on the adoption and use of ICT in construction projects: a Swedish case study

In contemporary research on construction‐related ICT (information communication technologies), little distinction is made between the use of ICT in permanent line organizations and its use in temporary organizations (for example, in building and construction projects). This paper makes that distinction. The aim is to understand how the interplay among contextual elements, actors’ frames of reference, and the ICT itself, influences the adoption and use of ICT in a building and construction project. This will be done through a description and analysis of a case study of ICT use in a major Swedish construction company. It is concluded that the well‐defined duration of the temporary organization (the construction project) stands in sharp contrast to the generally indefinite duration of ICT‐mediated change processes. However, by analysing the ICT application to be implemented, it can be revealed whether it can be ‘ready packed’ for, or delimited to, certain processes in order to achieve immediate benefits. When implementing more encompassing ICT applications, the challenge for the company is to find alternative ways of implementation in the project‐based organization and of creating alternative spaces for innovation and renewal where new ICT can be tested and experimented with.

[1]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[2]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[3]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Why information systems fail , 1975 .

[4]  D. Robey,et al.  Cultural analysis of the organizational consequences of information technology , 1994 .

[5]  Michael Murray,et al.  Communication in Construction: Theory and Practice , 2006 .

[6]  Rob Kling,et al.  Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research , 1980, CSUR.

[7]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[8]  B. Latour.  10 ''Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts'' , 1992 .

[9]  Steve Rowlinson,et al.  IT sophistication, performance and progress towards formal electronic communication in the Hong Kong construction industry , 2006 .

[10]  Michel Callon,et al.  Actor Network Theory , 2001 .

[11]  Ulrica Nylén.  Att presentera kvalitativa data : Framställningsstrategier vid empiriredovisning , 2005 .

[12]  Mike Bresnen,et al.  Conflicting and conflated discourses? Project management, organisational change and learning , 2006 .

[13]  J. Turner,et al.  Quantity versus Quality in Project-Based Learning Practices , 2000 .

[14]  Henrik C. J. Linderoth.  Fiery spirits and supporting programs of action: keys to exploration and exploitation of open technologies , 2002 .

[15]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[16]  C. Ciborra.  Introduction: what does groupware mean for the organizations hosting it? , 1997 .

[17]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics , 1984 .

[19]  Alexander Löfgren,et al.  EDITOR: B-C Björk , 2006 .

[20]  Henrik Linderoth,et al.  Frames and inscriptions: tracing a way to understand IT-dependent change projects , 2005 .

[21]  B. Latour.  Technology is Society Made Durable , 1990 .

[22]  Henrik C. J. Linderoth,et al.  Make Technology Invisible, or Keep it Visible? - The Role of Intra-organizational Transfer and Integration of Project Outcomes , 2007, Organizational Dynamics of Technology-Based Innovation.

[23]  Panagiotis Mitropoulos,et al.  Forces driving adoption of new information technologies , 2000 .

[24]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  An Improvisational Model of Change Management: The Case of Groupware Technologies , 1996 .

[26]  J. Law.  A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[27]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  Steve Rowlinson,et al.  The temporal nature of forces acting on innovative IT in major construction projects , 2007 .

[29]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[30]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards , 1997 .

[31]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[32]  Anders Ekholm,et al.  Benefits of ICT in the construction industry - characterization of the present situation in house-building processes , 2007 .

[33]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  M. Arthur,et al.  Paradox in Project-Based Enterprise: The Case of Film Making , 1998 .

[35]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[36]  B. Latour,et al.  Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? , 1986 .

[37]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[38]  D. Gann,et al.  Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems , 2000 .

[39]  E Monteiro,et al.  Integrating Health Information Systems: A Critical Appraisal , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[40]  Daniel Robey,et al.  A Social Process Model of User-Analyst Relationships , 1992, MIS Q..

[41]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[42]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[43]  Paul DiMaggio.  Comment on "What Theory is Not." , 1995 .