The Risk of Peripheral Vein Phlebitis Associated With Chlorhexidine-Coated Catheters A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the risk of phlebitis associated with chlorhexidine-coated polyurethane catheters in peripheral veins. Design: A randomized, double-blinded trial comparing chlorhexidine-coated polyurethane catheters with uncoated polyurethane catheters. Setting: A university hospital. Patients: Adult medicine and surgery patients. Interventions: Certified registered nurse anesthetists or an infusion team consisting of nurses and physicians inserted the catheters. Catheter insertion sites were scored twice daily for evidence of phlebitis. At the time catheters were removed, a quantitative blood culture was performed, and catheters were sonicated for quantitative culture. Results: Of 221 evaluable catheters, phlebitis developed in 18 (17%) of 105 coated catheters, compared to 27 (23%) of 116 uncoated catheters (relative risk [RR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 0.43-1.26; P=.32). By survival analysis, chlorhexidine-coated catheters had a lower risk of phlebitis during the first 3 days (P=.06), but not when all catheters were considered in both patient groups (P=.31). In the absence of catheter colonization, the incidence of phlebitis was 21% (16/76) and 24% (20/86) for coated and uncoated catheters, respectively (P=.85), whereas in the presence of catheter colonization, the incidence of phlebitis was 14% (1/7) and 80% (4/5) for coated and uncoated catheters, respectively (RR, 0.18; CI95, 0.03-1.15; P=.07). Conclusion: The risk of phlebitis in the presence of catheter colonization was 82% lower for chlorhexidinecoated polyurethane catheters compared to otherwise identical uncoated catheters.

[1]  J. Elam,et al.  Surface modification of intravenous catheters to reduce local tissue reactions. , 1993, Biomaterials.

[2]  R. Sherertz,et al.  Efficacy of antibiotic-coated catheters in preventing subcutaneous Staphylococcus aureus infection in rabbits. , 1993, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[3]  R. Bijleveld,et al.  Severe allergic reaction to an intraurethral preparation containing chlorhexidine. , 1992, British journal of urology.

[4]  M. Ringer,et al.  Risk factors for infusion-related phlebitis with small peripheral venous catheters. A randomized controlled trial. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[5]  T. Watts,et al.  An in vivo study of neutrophil locomotion in relation to periodontal disease status and local chlorhexidine. , 1990, Oral microbiology and immunology.

[6]  Anusha,et al.  Three-year experience with sonicated vascular catheter cultures in a clinical microbiology laboratory , 1990, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[7]  T. Watts,et al.  Effects of chlorhexidine solution on neutrophil locomotion in vitro. , 1989, Journal of dentistry.

[8]  R. Sherertz,et al.  Efficacy of dicloxacillin-coated polyurethane catheters in preventing subcutaneous Staphylococcus aureus infection in mice , 1989, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[9]  J. Calop,et al.  [Peripheral venous catheterization: influence of catheter composition on the occurrence of thrombophlebitis]. , 1989, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation.

[10]  T. Warren,et al.  Complications of intravenous therapy: a randomized prospective study--Vialon vs. Teflon. , 1989, Journal of intravenous nursing : the official publication of the Intravenous Nurses Society.

[11]  P B Gaukroger,et al.  Infusion Thrombophlebitis: A Prospective Comparison of 645 Vialon® and Teflon® Cannulae in Anaesthetic and Postoperative Use , 1988, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[12]  H. Creamer,et al.  The influence of chlorhexidine on superoxide generation by induced human neutrophils. , 1987, Journal of periodontal research.

[13]  S. Heard,et al.  Influence of sterile protective sleeves on the sterility of pulmonary artery catheters. , 1987, Critical care medicine.

[14]  D. Solomon,et al.  An in vivo method for the evaluation of catheter thrombogenicity. , 1987, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  J. Goultschin,et al.  Inhibition of superoxide generation by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes with chlorhexidine. Its possible relation to periodontal disease. , 1986, Journal of periodontology.

[16]  K. Tadokoro,et al.  IgE antibody‐mediated shock reaction caused by topical application of chlorhexidine , 1986, Clinical allergy.

[17]  J. O'leary,et al.  Allergic Reaction to Chlorhexidine in an Anaesthetised Patient , 1985, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[18]  H. Hansson,et al.  Material thrombogenicity in central venous catheterization: a comparison between soft, antebrachial catheters of silicone elastomer and polyurethane. , 1984, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[19]  C. Hargiss,et al.  A decentralized approach to maintenance of intravenous therapy. , 1984, American journal of infection control.

[20]  A. Shoji Contact dermatitis from chlorhexidine , 1983, Contact dermatitis.

[21]  D. N. Williams,et al.  Infusion thrombophlebitis and infiltration associated with intravenous cannulae: a controlled study comparing three different cannula types. , 1982, NITA.

[22]  D. Goldmann,et al.  Complications of intravenous therapy with steel needles and Teflon catheters. A comparative study. , 1981, The American journal of medicine.

[23]  M. Knuuttila,et al.  Effect of chlorhexidine gluconate on acute nonmicrobial inflammation reaction. , 1978, Journal of periodontology.

[24]  A. F. Peterson,et al.  Safety and efficacy of the antiseptic chlorhexidine gluconate. , 1976, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[25]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Effect of chlorhexidine on gingival wound healing in the dog. A histometric study. , 1975, Journal of clinical periodontology.