Monitoring and detecting atrial fibrillation using wearable technology

Atrial fibrillation (AFib) is diagnosed by analysis of the morphological and rhythmic properties of the electrocardiogram. It was recently shown that accurate detection of AFib is possible using beat-to-beat interval variations. This raises the question of whether AFib detection can be performed using a pulsatile waveform such as the Photoplethysmogram (PPG). The recent explosion in use of recreational and professional ambulatory wrist-based pulse monitoring devices means that an accurate pulse-based AFib screening algorithm would enable large scale screening for silent or undiagnosed AFib, a significant risk factor for multiple diseases. We propose a noise-resistant machine learning approach to detecting AFib from noisy ambulatory PPG recorded from the wrist using a modern research watch-based wearable device (the Samsung Simband). Ambulatory pulsatile and movement data were recorded from 46 subjects, 15 with AFib and 31 non symptomatic. Single channel electrocardiogram (ECG), multi-wavelength PPG and tri-axial accelerometry were recorded simultaneously at 128 Hz from the non-dominant wrist using the Simband. Recording lengths varied from 3.5 to 8.5 minutes. Pulse (beat) detection was performed on the PPG waveforms, and eleven features were extracted based on beat-to-beat variability and waveform signal quality. Using 10-fold cross validation, an accuracy of 95 % on out-of-sample data was achieved, with a sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 94%, and an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.99. The described approach provides a noise-resistant, accurate screening tool for AFib from PPG sensors located in an ambulatory wrist watch. To our knowledge this is the first study to demonstrate an algorithm with a high enough accuracy to be used in general population studies that does not require an ambulatory Holter electrocardiographic monitor.

[1]  P. Wolf,et al.  Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. , 1991, Stroke.

[2]  O. Benavente,et al.  Antithrombotic Therapy To Prevent Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  Stephen S. Cha,et al.  Secular Trends in Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and Implications on the Projections for Future Prevalence , 2006, Circulation.

[4]  Salim Yusuf,et al.  Incidence of stroke in paroxysmal versus sustained atrial fibrillation in patients taking oral anticoagulation or combined antiplatelet therapy: an ACTIVE W Substudy. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  R G Mark,et al.  Robust heart rate estimation from multiple asynchronous noisy sources using signal quality indices and a Kalman filter , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[6]  Sheng Lu,et al.  Automatic Real Time Detection of Atrial Fibrillation , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  A Deshmane,et al.  False arrhythmia alarm suppression using ECG, ABP, and photoplethysmogram , 2009 .

[8]  Shamim Nemati,et al.  Data Fusion for Improved Respiration Rate Estimation , 2010, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[9]  A. Capucci,et al.  Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Luigi Padeletti,et al.  Usefulness of continuous electrocardiographic monitoring for atrial fibrillation. , 2012, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  Qiao Li,et al.  Open source Java-based ECG analysis software and Android app for Atrial Fibrillation screening , 2013, Computing in Cardiology 2013.

[12]  L. Friberg,et al.  Atrial fibrillation prevalence revisited , 2013, Journal of internal medicine.

[13]  Luca T. Mainardi,et al.  A Support Vector Machine approach for reliable detection of atrial fibrillation events , 2013, Computing in Cardiology 2013.

[14]  Dingchang Zheng,et al.  Analysis of heart rate variability using fuzzy measure entropy , 2013, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[15]  Marco V Perez,et al.  Feasibility of Extended Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Monitoring to Identify Silent Atrial Fibrillation in High‐risk Patients: The Screening Study for Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation (STUDY‐AF) , 2015, Clinical cardiology.

[16]  Travis J. Moss,et al.  Heart rate dynamics distinguish among atrial fibrillation, normal sinus rhythm and sinus rhythm with frequent ectopy , 2015, Physiological measurement.

[17]  Lars-Åke Levin,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of mass screening for untreated atrial fibrillation using intermittent ECG recording. , 2015, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[18]  Mårten Rosenqvist,et al.  Mass Screening for Untreated Atrial Fibrillation: The STROKESTOP Study , 2015, Circulation.

[19]  A. Frontera,et al.  Smart-watches: a potential challenger to the implantable loop recorder? , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[20]  J. Chong,et al.  PULSE‐SMART: Pulse‐Based Arrhythmia Discrimination Using a Novel Smartphone Application , 2016, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.