The Effect of Place-Based Policy on Urban Land Green Use Efficiency: Evidence from the Pilot Free-Trade Zone Establishment in China

The improvement of urban land green use efficiency is significant in promoting sustainable development. As an important place-based policy in China, the pilot free-trade zone establishment has exerted a profound impact on urban economy and society. Meanwhile, the issue of whether the pilot free-trade zone can improve urban land green use efficiency or not is missing from prior literature, which is the concern of this study. Specifically, based on the super-efficiency slacks-based measure model, we first measure urban land green use efficiency of 279 cities in China from 2011 to 2019 and then use the multi-period difference-in-differences method to investigate the causal effect of the pilot free-trade zone establishment on urban land green use efficiency. The results show that the pilot free-trade zone significantly improved urban land green use efficiency, especially in the eastern cities, the coastal cities, and the cities with a high economic development level. Further, there exists a spatial spillover effect of the pilot free-trade zone on urban land green use efficiency. This study has implications for optimal allocation of urban land in the deployment of place-based policies, serving economic structural upgrading and a carbon neutrality vision.

[1]  Zhi Chen,et al.  The effect of broadband infrastructure construction on urban green innovation: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China , 2022, Economic Analysis and Policy.

[2]  Jiangfeng Li,et al.  Cultivated land use efficiency and its driving factors in the Yellow River Basin, China , 2022, Ecological Indicators.

[3]  P. Devine‐Wright Decarbonisation of industrial clusters: A place-based research agenda , 2022, Energy Research & Social Science.

[4]  Yi Xiao,et al.  Exploring the coupling coordination and key factors between urbanization and land use efficiency in ecologically sensitive areas: A case study of the Loess Plateau, China , 2022, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[5]  Mingbo Zheng,et al.  Does the establishment of Pilot Free Trade Test Zones promote the transformation and upgradation of trade patterns? , 2022, Economic Analysis and Policy.

[6]  Wenquan Liang,et al.  The Environmental Consequences of Place‐Based Policies in China: An Empirical Study Based on SO 2 Emission Data , 2022, China & World Economy.

[7]  Feng He,et al.  Does the Pilot Free Trade Zone Promote the Quality of Urban Economic Growth: An Empirical Research Based on Quasi-Natural Experiment , 2022, Sustainability.

[8]  Weifen Lin,et al.  Do pilot free trade zones improve the green total factor productivity? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[9]  Hui Liu,et al.  Positive impacts of farmland fragmentation on agricultural production efficiency in Qilu Lake watershed: Implications for appropriate scale management , 2022, Land Use Policy.

[10]  Lianghu Wang,et al.  Can China’s Pilot Free Trade Zone Improve Trade Efficiency? , 2022, Journal of International Commerce Economics and Policy.

[11]  Zhangsheng Liu,et al.  Growth Targets Management, Regional Competition and Urban Land Green Use Efficiency According to Evidence from China , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[12]  Laura Tach,et al.  Do Federal Place-Based Policies Improve Economic Opportunity in Rural Communities? , 2022, RSF.

[13]  Yang Xu,et al.  Efficiency of urban land use in China’s resource-based cities, 2000–2018 , 2022, Land Use Policy.

[14]  Yuan Feng,et al.  Re-examining the effect of China’s new-energy demonstration cities construction policy on environmental pollution: a perspective of pollutant emission intensity control , 2022, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.

[15]  Shen Zhong,et al.  Impacts of land finance on green land use efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: a spatial econometrics analysis , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[16]  Zuankuo Liu,et al.  The impact and mechanisms of the Shanghai pilot free-trade zone on the green total factor productivity of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[17]  Yu-lian Fei,et al.  How to Evaluate the Green and High-Quality Development Path? An FsQCA Approach on the China Pilot Free Trade Zone , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[18]  Gao Jingxin,et al.  A new methodology to measure the urban construction land-use efficiency based on the two-stage DEA model , 2022, Land Use Policy.

[19]  Kexin Yang,et al.  Have China’s Pilot Free Trade Zones Improved Green Total Factor Productivity? , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[20]  Zhenghui Li,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Evolution Characteristics and Spatial Interaction Spillover Effects of New-Urbanization and Green Land Utilization Efficiency , 2021, Land.

[21]  Hai-Jun Jiang,et al.  Foreign direct investment and regional innovation: Evidence from China , 2021, The World Economy.

[22]  Jiaguo Liu,et al.  Pilot free trade zones and Chinese port-listed companies performance: An empirical research based on quasi-natural experiment , 2021 .

[23]  Chuanwang Sun,et al.  Green innovation effect of emission trading policy on pilot areas and neighboring areas: An analysis based on the spatial econometric model , 2021 .

[24]  Min Zhou,et al.  Regional differences and dynamic evolution of urban land green use efficiency within the Yangtze River Delta, China , 2021, Land Use Policy.

[25]  Bei Liu,et al.  Does Smart City Construction Improve the Green Utilization Efficiency of Urban Land? , 2021, Land.

[26]  Jun Cai,et al.  A dynamic panel data approach and HCW's method: Assessing the effect of China (Shanghai) Free Trade Zone on local GDP , 2021 .

[27]  Xiaodong Yang,et al.  Can the new energy demonstration city policy reduce environmental pollution? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[28]  Zuankuo Liu,et al.  The impact of the free trade zone on green total factor productivity ——evidence from the shanghai pilot free trade zone , 2021 .

[29]  Teevrat Garg,et al.  The Ecological Impact of Place-Based Economic Policies , 2021, American Journal of Agricultural Economics.

[30]  Xiao Lu,et al.  Green Transition of Cultivated Land Use in the Yellow River Basin: A Perspective of Green Utilization Efficiency Evaluation , 2020, Land.

[31]  C. Zhuo,et al.  Policy dividend or "policy trap"? Environmental welfare of establishing free trade zone in China. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[32]  K. Tang,et al.  Urban carbon emission intensity under emission trading system in a developing economy: evidence from 273 Chinese cities , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[33]  Hongyi Li,et al.  EFFECTS OF FREE TRADE ZONE POLICY ON CHINA’S INCOME DISPARITY , 2020 .

[34]  Qi Cui,et al.  Does the pilot free trade zone policy attract the entering of foreign-invested enterprises? The evidence from China , 2020 .

[35]  Sanwei He,et al.  Exploring the influence of urban form on land-use efficiency from a spatiotemporal heterogeneity perspective: Evidence from 336 Chinese cities , 2020 .

[36]  Haowei Hu,et al.  Comparative Advantages of Free Trade Port Construction in Shanghai under the Belt and Road Initiative , 2020, International Journal of Financial Studies.

[37]  Jiangfeng Hu,et al.  Environmental regulation, innovation quality and firms’ competitivity―Quasi-natural experiment based on China’s carbon emissions trading pilot , 2020, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja.

[38]  Shiliang Su,et al.  Does the establishment of development zones really improve industrial land use efficiency? Implications for China’s high-quality development policy , 2020 .

[39]  Shanlin Yang,et al.  Land use efficiency and influencing factors of urban agglomerations in China , 2019, Land Use Policy.

[40]  Yi Lu,et al.  Place-Based Policies, Creation, and Agglomeration Economies: Evidence from China’s Economic Zone Program , 2019, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy.

[41]  Markus Grillitsch,et al.  Green industry development in different types of regions , 2019, European Planning Studies.

[42]  Yishao Shi,et al.  Evaluation of Land Intensive Use in Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone , 2019, Land.

[43]  Arnault Morisson,et al.  Regional innovation governance and place-based policies: design, implementation and implications , 2019, Regional Studies, Regional Science.

[44]  Wei Wang,et al.  Spatial-temporal disparities and influencing factors of total-factor green use efficiency of industrial land in China , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[45]  Jos N. van Ommeren,et al.  Place-Based Policies and the Housing Market , 2018, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[46]  Xianjin Huang,et al.  Effects of dual land ownerships and different land lease terms on industrial land use efficiency in Wuxi City, East China , 2018, Habitat International.

[47]  Xiangzheng Deng,et al.  Dynamics of land use efficiency with ecological intercorrelation in regional development , 2017, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[48]  Maximilian von Ehrlich,et al.  The Persistent Effects of Place-Based Policy: Evidence from the West-German Zonenrandgebiet , 2015, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy.

[49]  Sam Desiere,et al.  Land Productivity and Plot Size: Is Measurement Error Driving the Inverse Relationship? , 2017 .

[50]  Yi Lu,et al.  Does flattening government improve economic performance? Evidence from China , 2016 .

[51]  Han Zhang,et al.  Housing prices raise wages: Estimating the unexpected effects of land supply regulation in China , 2016 .

[52]  E. Hui,et al.  Analysis on coupling relationship of urban scale and intensive use of land in China , 2015 .

[53]  Jens Hainmueller,et al.  Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies , 2012, Political Analysis.

[54]  Ross Levine,et al.  Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States , 2009 .

[55]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..