Differential scaling of locomotor performance in small and large terrestrial mammals.

It has been observed that the relationship between locomotor performance and body mass in terrestrial mammals does not follow a single linear trend when the entire range of body mass is considered. Large taxa tend to show different scaling exponents compared to those of small taxa, suggesting that there would be a differential scaling between small and large mammals. This pattern, noted previously for several morphological traits in mammals, has been explained to occur as a result of mechanical constraints over bones due to the differential effect of gravity on small and large-sized forms. The relationship between maximum relative running speed (body length s(-1)) and body mass was analysed in 142 species of terrestrial mammals, in order to evaluate whether the relative locomotor performance shows a differential scaling depending on the range of mass analysed, and whether the scaling pattern is consistent with the idea of mechanical constraints on locomotor performance. The scaling of relative locomotor performance proved to be non-linear when the entire range of body masses was considered and showed a differential scaling between small and large mammals. Among the small species, a negative, although nearly independent, relationship with body mass was noted. In contrast, maximum relative running speed in large mammals showed a strong negative relationship with body mass. This reduction in locomotor performance was correlated with a decrease in the ability to withstand the forces applied on bones and may be understood as a necessary stress reduction mechanism for assuring the structural integrity of the limb skeleton in large species.

[1]  D R Carrier,et al.  Influence of increased rotational inertia on the turning performance of humans. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[2]  D R Carrier,et al.  Influence of rotational inertia on turning performance of theropod dinosaurs: clues from humans with increased rotational inertia. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[3]  Anders Hedenström,et al.  Predator versus prey: on aerial hunting and escape strategies in birds , 2001 .

[4]  B. Sinervo,et al.  REPRODUCTIVE BURDEN, LOCOMOTOR PERFORMANCE, AND THE COST OF REPRODUCTION IN FREE RANGING LIZARDS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  P. Domenici,et al.  The scaling of locomotor performance in predator-prey encounters: from fish to killer whales. , 2000, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.

[6]  T. Garland,et al.  Sprint performance of phrynosomatid lizards, measured on a high‐speed treadmill, correlates with hindlimb length , 1999 .

[7]  P. Christiansen Scaling of mammalian long bones: small and large mammals compared , 1999 .

[8]  B. Jayne,et al.  A Field Study of the Effects of Incline on the Escape Locomotion of a Bipedal Lizard, Callisaurus draconoides , 1999, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[9]  Marina Silva,et al.  Allometric Scaling of Body Length: Elastic or Geometric Similarity in Mammalian Design , 1998 .

[10]  M. Taper,et al.  On size and area: Patterns of mammalian body size extremes across landmasses , 1998, Evolutionary Ecology.

[11]  C T Farley,et al.  Maximum speed and mechanical power output in lizards. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[12]  R. E. Blanco,et al.  Scaling of the Indicator of Athletic Capability in Fossil and Extant Land Tetrapods , 1997 .

[13]  J. H. Zar,et al.  Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd edn. , 1996 .

[14]  T. Garland,et al.  EVOLUTION OF SPRINT SPEED IN LACERTID LIZARDS: MORPHOLOGICAL, PHYSIOLOGICAL, AND BEHAVIORAL COVARIATION , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  R. Alexander,et al.  Ecological morphology : integrative organismal biology , 1995 .

[16]  J. Downing,et al.  The Allometric Scaling of Density and Body Mass: A Nonlinear Relationship for Terrestrial Mammals , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[17]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Experimental investigations of mass-dependent predation risk in the European starling, Sturnus vulgaris , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  D. Eilam,et al.  Influence of body morphology on turning behavior in carnivores. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  T. Garland Chapter 11. Phylogenetic Analyses of Lizard Endurance Capacity in Relation to Body Size and Body Temperature , 1994 .

[20]  John E. A. Bertram,et al.  Allometry and curvature in the long bones of quadrupedal mammals , 1992 .

[21]  D. J. Wells,et al.  Running energetics in the pronghorn antelope , 1991, Nature.

[22]  C T Farley,et al.  A mechanical trigger for the trot-gallop transition in horses. , 1991, Science.

[23]  B Efron,et al.  Statistical Data Analysis in the Computer Age , 1991, Science.

[24]  A. Biewener Biomechanics of mammalian terrestrial locomotion. , 1990, Science.

[25]  J. Losos THE EVOLUTION OF FORM AND FUNCTION: MORPHOLOGY AND LOCOMOTOR PERFORMANCE IN WEST INDIAN ANOLIS LIZARDS , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  J. Bertram,et al.  Differential scaling of the long bones in the terrestrial carnivora and other mammals , 1990, Journal of morphology.

[27]  Jonathan B. Losos,et al.  Ecomorphology, Performance Capability, and Scaling of West Indian Anolis Lizards: An Evolutionary Analysis , 1990 .

[28]  A. Biewener Scaling body support in mammals: limb posture and muscle mechanics. , 1989, Science.

[29]  Theodore Garland,et al.  Maximal Running Speeds of Bipedal and Quadrupedal Rodents , 1988 .

[30]  R. Blickhan,et al.  Kangaroo rat locomotion: design for elastic energy storage or acceleration? , 1988, The Journal of experimental biology.

[31]  Theodore Garland,et al.  Comparative locomotor performance of marsupial and placental mammals , 1988 .

[32]  Andrew A. Biewener,et al.  Mechanics of locomotion and jumping in the horse (Equus): in vivo stress in the tibia and metatarsus , 1988 .

[33]  A. Casinos,et al.  Allometry of the limb long bones of insectivores and rodents , 1987, Journal of morphology.

[34]  C. R. Taylor,et al.  Bone strain: a determinant of gait and speed? , 1986, The Journal of experimental biology.

[35]  C. R. Taylor,et al.  Force development during sustained locomotion: a determinant of gait, speed and metabolic power. , 1985, The Journal of experimental biology.

[36]  T. Garland Physiological correlates of locomotory performance in a lizard: an allometric approach. , 1984, The American journal of physiology.

[37]  L E Lanyon,et al.  Dynamic strain similarity in vertebrates; an alternative to allometric limb bone scaling. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  A. C. Economos Elastic and/or geometric similarity in mammalian design? , 1983, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  A. Biewener Allometry of quadrupedal locomotion: the scaling of duty factor, bone curvature and limb orientation to body size. , 1983, The Journal of experimental biology.

[40]  A. Biewener Locomotory stresses in the limb bones of two small mammals: the ground squirrel and chipmunk. , 1983, The Journal of experimental biology.

[41]  D. Sprugel,et al.  Correcting for Bias in Log‐Transformed Allometric Equations , 1983 .

[42]  A A Biewener,et al.  Bone strength in small mammals and bipedal birds: do safety factors change with body size? , 1982, The Journal of experimental biology.

[43]  A. C. Economos The largest land mammal , 1981 .

[44]  W. Cleveland Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[45]  Robert D. Stevenson,et al.  Integrating Thermal Physiology and Ecology of Ectotherms: A Discussion of Approaches , 1979 .

[46]  Webb Pw,et al.  The effect of size on the fast-start performance of rainbow trout Salmo cairdneri, and a consideration of piscivorous predator-prey interactions. , 1976 .

[47]  T. McMahon Using body size to understand the structural design of animals: quadrupedal locomotion. , 1975, Journal of applied physiology.

[48]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Allometry and Biomechanics: Limb Bones in Adult Ungulates , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[49]  H. Howland Optimal strategies for predator avoidance: the relative importance of speed and manoeuvrability. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[50]  K Schmidt-Nielsen,et al.  Effect of hyperthermia on heat balance during running in the African hunting dog. , 1971, The American journal of physiology.

[51]  Van damme R,et al.  Absolute versus per unit body length speed of prey as an estimator of vulnerability to predation. , 1999, Animal behaviour.

[52]  Theodore Garland,et al.  Does metatarsal/femur ratio predict maximal running speed in cursorial mammals? , 1993 .

[53]  M. Djawdan Locomotor performance of bipedal and quadrupedal heteromyid rodents , 1993 .

[54]  S. Lindstedt,et al.  Limits to maximal performance. , 1993, Annual review of physiology.

[55]  Michael LaBarbera,et al.  ANALYZING BODY SIZE AS A FACTOR IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION , 1989 .

[56]  K. Schmidt-Nielsen,et al.  Scaling, why is animal size so important? , 1984 .

[57]  D. Prothero,et al.  Allometry and Paleoecology of Medial Miocene Dwarf Rhinoceroses from the Texas Gulf Coastal Plain , 1982, Paleobiology.

[58]  Alexander Rm,et al.  Factors of safety in the structure of animals. , 1981 .

[59]  R. M. Alexander Factors of safety in the structure of animals. , 1981, Science progress.

[60]  P W Webb,et al.  The effect of size on the fast-start performance of rainbow trout Salmo cairdneri, and a consideration of piscivorous predator-prey interactions. , 1976, The Journal of experimental biology.

[61]  B. Günther Dimensional analysis and theory of biological similarity. , 1975, Physiological reviews.

[62]  Ronald M. Nowak,et al.  Walker's mammals of the world , 1968 .

[63]  A. Hill Dimensions of Animals and their Muscular Dynamics , 1949, Nature.

[64]  T. Garland,et al.  Ecological Morphology of Locomotor Performance in Squamate Reptiles , 2022 .