Personalization via collaboration in Web retrieval systems: A context based approach

World Wide Web is a source of information, and searches on the Web can be analyzed to detect patterns in Web users' search behaviors and information needs to effectively handle the users' subsequent needs. The rationale is that the information need of a user at a particular time point occurs in a particular context, and queries are derived from that need. In this paper, we discuss an extension of our personalization approach that was originally developed for a traditional bibliographic retrieval system but has been adapted and extended with a collaborative model for the Web retrieval environment. We start with a brief introduction of our personalization approach in a traditional information retrieval system. Then, based on the differences in the nature of documents, users and search tasks between traditional and Web retrieval environments, we describe our extensions of integrating collaboration in personalization in the Web retrieval environment. The architecture for the extension integrates machine learning techniques for the purpose of better modeling users' search tasks. Finally, a user-oriented evaluation of Web-based adaptive retrieval systems is presented as an important aspect of the overall strategy for personalization.

[1]  Daqing He,et al.  Combining evidence for automatic Web session identification , 2002, Inf. Process. Manag..

[2]  W. Buxton Human-Computer Interaction , 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[3]  Daqing He,et al.  Analysing Web Search Logs to Determine Session Boundaries for User-Oriented Learning , 2000, AH.

[4]  Terry R. Payne,et al.  Experience with Learning Agents which Manage Internet-Based Information , 1996 .

[5]  Daqing He,et al.  Detecting session boundaries from Web user logs , 2000 .

[6]  A. S. Goker,et al.  Web user search pattern analysis for modelling query topic changes , 2001 .

[7]  LearningStan Matwin,et al.  The Role of Context in Concept , 1996 .

[8]  WalkerS.,et al.  Experimentation as a way of life , 2000 .

[9]  Jaideep Srivastava,et al.  Automatic personalization based on Web usage mining , 2000, CACM.

[10]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Issues of context in information retrieval (IR): an introduction to the special issue , 2002, Inf. Process. Manag..

[11]  María G. Cisneros-Solís,et al.  MEDICAL ANNUAL , 1958, Journal of The Royal Naval Medical Service.

[12]  Stephen E. Robertson,et al.  Experimentation as a way of life: Okapi at TREC , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..

[13]  Zbigniew Raś,et al.  Methodologies for Intelligent Systems: 6th International Symposium, Ismis '91 Charlotte, N.C., Usa, October 16-19, 1991 : Proceedings , 1991 .

[14]  Michael J. Pazzani,et al.  Learning and Revising User Profiles: The Identification of Interesting Web Sites , 1997, Machine Learning.

[15]  Ay Se,et al.  Capturing Information Need by Learning User Context , 1999 .

[16]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Real life information retrieval: a study of user queries on the Web , 1998, SIGF.

[17]  Daqing He,et al.  Personalization via Collaboration in Web Retrieval Systems. , 2003 .

[18]  T. L. McCluskey,et al.  Towards an Adaptive Information Retrieval System , 1991, ISMIS.

[19]  SpinkAmanda,et al.  Real life information retrieval: a study of user queries on the Web , 1998 .

[20]  Paul Over,et al.  SIGIR workshop on interactive retrieval at TREC and beyond , 2000, SIGF.

[21]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Modeling Users' Successive Searches in Digital Environments: A National Science Foundation/British Library Funded Study , 1998, D Lib Mag..

[22]  A. Göker Context learning in Okapi , 1997, J. Documentation.

[23]  Stephen E. Robertson,et al.  Relevance weighting of search terms , 1976, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[24]  Inderjeet Mani,et al.  Representational Issues in Machine Learning of User Profiles , 1996 .