Laser Welding Quality Monitoring via Graph Support Vector Machine With Data Adaptive Kernel

Laser welding is a rapidly developing technology that is of utmost importance in a number of industrial processes. The physics of the process has been investigated over the past 50 years and is mostly well understood. Nevertheless, online laser-quality monitoring remains an open issue until today due to its dynamic complexity. This paper is a supplement to existing approaches in the field of in situ and real-time laser-quality monitoring that presents a novel combination of state-of-the-art sensors and machine learning for data processing. The investigations were carried out using laser welding of titanium workpieces. The quality was estimated a posteriori by the visual inspection of cross-sections of the welded joints. Four quality categories were defined to cover the two main laser welding regimes: conduction and keyhole. The signals from the laser back reflection and optical and acoustic emissions were recorded during the laser welding process and were decomposed with the $M$ -band wavelets. The relative energies of narrow frequency bands were taken as descriptive features. The correlation of the extracted features with the laser welding quality was carried out using the Laplacian graph support vector machine classifier. Also, an adaptive kernel for the classifier was developed to improve the analysis of the distributions of the complex features and was constructed from Gaussian mixtures. The presented laser welding setup and the developed adaptive kernel algorithm were able to classify the quality for every $2~\mu \text{m}$ of the welded joint with an accuracy ranged between 85.9% and 99.9%. Finally, the results of the developed adaptive kernel were compared with state-of-the-art machine learning methods.

[1]  Kilian Wasmer,et al.  In Situ and Real-Time Monitoring of Powder-Bed AM by Combining Acoustic Emission and Artificial Intelligence , 2017 .

[2]  Kilian Wasmer,et al.  Deep Learning for In Situ and Real-Time Quality Monitoring in Additive Manufacturing Using Acoustic Emission , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[3]  Yung C. Shin,et al.  Estimation of keyhole geometry and prediction of welding defects during laser welding based on a vision system and a radial basis function neural network , 2015, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[4]  Fred A. Hamprecht,et al.  Weakly Supervised Learning of a Classifier for Unusual Event Detection , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  I. Daubechies Ten Lectures on Wavelets , 1992 .

[6]  George Chryssolouris,et al.  A numerical approach to modeling keyhole laser welding , 2015 .

[7]  Isabelle Choquet,et al.  Laser Welding Process – A Review of Keyhole Welding Modelling , 2015 .

[8]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Normalized cuts and image segmentation , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[9]  S. Katayama,et al.  High quality welding of stainless steel with 10 kW high power fibre laser , 2009 .

[10]  Lin Li,et al.  A Comparative Study of Ultrasound Emission Characteristics in Laser Processing , 2002 .

[11]  Deyong You,et al.  WPD-PCA-Based Laser Welding Process Monitoring and Defects Diagnosis by Using FNN and SVM , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[12]  Kilian Wasmer,et al.  Wavelet analysis of light emission signals in laser beam welding , 2017 .

[13]  William J. Williams,et al.  Time-frequency analysis of laser weld signature , 2001, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[14]  Meiko Boley,et al.  X-Ray and Optical Videography for 3D Measurement of Capillary and Melt Pool Geometry in Laser Welding , 2013 .

[15]  Margie P. Olbinado,et al.  Laser processing quality monitoring by combining acoustic emission and machine learning: a high-speed X-ray imaging approach , 2018 .

[16]  Mikhail Belkin,et al.  Laplacian Eigenmaps and Spectral Techniques for Embedding and Clustering , 2001, NIPS.

[17]  Genyu Chen,et al.  Direct observation of keyhole characteristics in deep penetration laser welding with a 10 kW fiber laser. , 2013, Optics express.

[18]  Hongping Gu,et al.  Resonant acoustic emission during laser welding of metals , 1996 .

[19]  Shiv Dutt Joshi,et al.  A new approach for estimation of statistically matched wavelet , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[20]  H. Tsai,et al.  Transport Phenomena and Keyhole Dynamics during Pulsed Laser Welding , 2006 .

[21]  S. Shevchik,et al.  Acoustic emission for in situ quality monitoring in additive manufacturing using spectral convolutional neural networks , 2017 .

[22]  Margie P. Olbinado,et al.  Why is in situ quality control of laser keyhole welding a real challenge , 2018 .

[23]  Yan Sang,et al.  Relationship between airborne acoustic and optical emissions during laser welding , 1997 .

[24]  Paul Kah,et al.  Real Time Non-Destructive Testing Methods of Welding , 2014 .

[25]  J. Laserna,et al.  Acoustic and optical emission during laser-induced plasma formation , 2004 .

[26]  H. Zeng,et al.  Wavelet analysis of acoustic emission signals and quality control in laser welding , 2001 .

[27]  Kilian Wasmer,et al.  Process Parameter Optimization for Wobbling Laser Spot Welding of Ti6Al4V Alloy , 2016 .

[28]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[29]  Peter Berger,et al.  Fluid Dynamic Effects in Keyhole Welding – An Attempt to Characterize Different Regimes , 2013 .

[30]  Bianca Maria Colosimo,et al.  Comparison of methods for data analysis in the remote monitoring of remote laser welding , 2013 .

[31]  Antonino Squillace,et al.  Effect of welding parameters on morphology and mechanical properties of Ti–6Al–4V laser beam welded butt joints , 2012 .

[32]  S. Katayama,et al.  Review of laser welding monitoring , 2014 .

[33]  Sonia Slimani,et al.  Experimental study of the dynamical coupling between the induced vapour plume and the melt pool for Nd–Yag CW laser welding , 2006 .

[34]  D. Farson,et al.  Relationship of optical and acoustic emissions to laser weld penetration , 1998 .

[35]  Mikhail Belkin,et al.  Manifold Regularization: A Geometric Framework for Learning from Labeled and Unlabeled Examples , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[36]  Michel Verleysen,et al.  Manifold Constrained Finite Gaussian Mixtures , 2005, IWANN.

[37]  Susumu Nakamura,et al.  Frequency analysis of optical and acoustic emissions during butt welding by CW YAG laser , 2003, International Congress on Laser Advanced Materials Processing.

[38]  Lianwen Jin,et al.  Laplacian Support Vector Machines with Multi-Kernel Learning , 2011, IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Mikhail Belkin,et al.  Laplacian Support Vector Machines Trained in the Primal , 2009, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[40]  Ana Cláudia Gabrielli Piveta,et al.  Mechanical strength and analysis of fracture of titanium joining submitted to laser and tig welding , 2012 .

[41]  Sören Hader System Concept for Image Sequence Classification in Laser Welding , 2003, DAGM-Symposium.