Key Insights into Hand Biomechanics: Human Grip Stiffness Can Be Decoupled from Force by Cocontraction and Predicted from Electromyography

We investigate the relation between grip force and grip stiffness for the human hand with and without voluntary cocontraction. Apart from gaining biomechanical insight, this issue is particularly relevant for variable-stiffness robotic systems, which can independently control the two parameters, but for which no clear methods exist to design or efficiently exploit them. Subjects were asked in one task to produce different levels of force, and stiffness was measured. As expected, this task reveals a linear coupling between force and stiffness. In a second task, subjects were then asked to additionally decouple stiffness from force at these force levels by using cocontraction. We measured the electromyogram from relevant groups of muscles and analyzed the possibility to predict stiffness and force. Optical tracking was used for avoiding wrist movements. We found that subjects were able to decouple grip stiffness from force when using cocontraction on average by about 20% of the maximum measured stiffness over all force levels, while this ability increased with the applied force. This result contradicts the force–stiffness behavior of most variable-stiffness actuators. Moreover, we found the thumb to be on average twice as stiff as the index finger and discovered that intrinsic hand muscles predominate our prediction of stiffness, but not of force. EMG activity and grip force allowed to explain 72 ± 12% of the measured variance in stiffness by simple linear regression, while only 33 ± 18% variance in force. Conclusively the high signal-to-noise ratio and the high correlation to stiffness of these muscles allow for a robust and reliable regression of stiffness, which can be used to continuously teleoperate compliance of modern robotic hands.

[1]  D. Ostry,et al.  Learning to control arm stiffness under static conditions. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  M. Latash,et al.  Joint stiffness: Myth or reality? , 1993 .

[3]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Embodying Desired Behavior in Variable Stiffness Actuators , 2011 .

[4]  Berthold Bäuml,et al.  When hard realtime matters: Software for complex mechatronic systems , 2008, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[5]  Markus Grebenstein,et al.  The Awiwi Hand: An Artificial Hand for the DLR Hand Arm System , 2014 .

[6]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  Human Robotics: Neuromechanics and Motor Control , 2013 .

[7]  T. Milner,et al.  Inability to activate muscles maximally during cocontraction and the effect on joint stiffness , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  I W Hunter,et al.  System identification of human joint dynamics. , 1990, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[9]  H. Gomi,et al.  Multijoint muscle regulation mechanisms examined by measured human arm stiffness and EMG signals. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Halla B. Olafsdottir,et al.  Is the thumb a fifth finger? A study of digit interaction during force production tasks , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  F. Zajac Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[12]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Cartesian impedance control techniques for torque controlled light-weight robots , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[13]  N. Hogan Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles , 1984 .

[14]  M. Hepp-Reymond,et al.  EMG activation patterns during force production in precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  G. Rau,et al.  Surface Electromyography in Relation to Force, Muscle Length and Endurance , 1973 .

[16]  Daniel Leidner,et al.  Classifying compliant manipulation tasks for automated planning in robotics , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[17]  Benjamin Recht,et al.  Random Features for Large-Scale Kernel Machines , 2007, NIPS.

[18]  T. Milner Contribution of geometry and joint stiffness to mechanical stability of the human arm , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  K. Kilgore,et al.  The function of the finger intrinsic muscles in response to electrical stimulation. , 1999, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[20]  J. H. Steiger Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .

[21]  Peter J. Beek,et al.  Can co-activation reduce kinematic variability? A simulation study , 2005, Biological Cybernetics.

[22]  Patrick van der Smagt,et al.  MRI-Based Skeletal Hand Movement Model , 2014, The Human Hand as an Inspiration for Robot Hand Development.

[23]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  A mathematical analysis of the force-stiffness characteristics of muscles in control of a single joint system , 1992, Biological Cybernetics.

[24]  Y. Koike,et al.  A myokinetic arm model for estimating joint torque and stiffness from EMG signals during maintained posture. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Patrick van der Smagt,et al.  The Grasp Perturbator: Calibrating human grasp stiffness during a graded force task , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[26]  B. Freriks,et al.  Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[27]  Joseph McIntyre,et al.  Correction: Task Dependency of Grip Stiffness—A Study of Human Grip Force and Grip Stiffness Dependency during Two Different Tasks with Same Grip Forces , 2014, PLoS ONE.

[28]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  Variable Stiffness Actuators: Review on Design and Components , 2016, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[29]  G. C. Joyce,et al.  Isotonic lengthening and shortening movements of cat soleus muscle , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  G. C. Joyce,et al.  The mechanical properties of cat soleus muscle during controlled lengthening and shortening movements , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Variable impedance actuators: A review , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[32]  G. Lichtwark,et al.  Intrinsic foot muscles have the capacity to control deformation of the longitudinal arch , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[33]  Paul L Gribble,et al.  Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  K. Akazawa,et al.  Modulation of reflex EMG and stiffness in response to stretch of human finger muscle. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  Rieko Osu,et al.  Short- and long-term changes in joint co-contraction associated with motor learning as revealed from surface EMG. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Voluntary control of motor units in human antagonist muscles: coactivation and reciprocal activation. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  The DLR hand arm system , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[38]  C L Van Doren Grasp stiffness as a function of grasp force and finger span. , 1998, Motor control.

[39]  M. Hepp-Reymond,et al.  EMG activation patterns during force production in precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  Werner Friedl,et al.  Soft Robotics with Variable Stiffness Actuators: Tough Robots for Soft Human Robot Interaction , 2015 .