Feedback After Good Trials Enhances Learning

Recent studies (Chiviacowsky & Wulf, 2002, 2005) have shown that learners prefer to receive feedback after they believe they had a “good” rather than “poor”trial. The present study followed up on this finding and examined whether learning would benefit if individuals received feedback after good relative to poor trials. Participants practiced a task that required them to throw beanbags at a target with their nondominant arm. Vision was prevented during and after the throws. All participants received knowledge of results (KR) on three trials in each 6-trial block. While one group (KR good) received KR for the three most effective trials in each block, another (KR poor) received feedback for the three least effective trials in each block. There were no group differences in practice. However, the KR good group showed learning advantages on a delayed retention test (without KR). These results demonstrated that learning is facilitated if feedback is provided after good rather than poor trials. The findings are interpreted as evidence for a motivational function of feedback.

[1]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Augmented Kinematic Feedback for Motor Learning. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[2]  R N Singer,et al.  Subject-controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  Heather Carnahan,et al.  Bandwidth Knowledge of Results and Motor Learning: More than Just a Relative Frequency Effect , 1990 .

[4]  J. Cauraugh,et al.  Effects of traditional and reversed bandwidth knowledge of results on motor learning. , 1993, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[5]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Neural dynamics of error processing in medial frontal cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[6]  R. Magill.  Motor Learning And Control , 1980 .

[7]  Howard N. Zelaznik,et al.  Advances in Motor Learning and Control , 1996 .

[8]  Remus Ilies,et al.  Goal regulation across time: the effects of feedback and affect. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  Q Lai,et al.  Bandwidth knowledge of results enhances generalized motor program learning. , 1999, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[10]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Average KR degrades parameter learning. , 1996, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  Charles H. Shea,et al.  Understanding the role of augmented feedback : The good, the bad and the ugly , 2004 .

[12]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Knowing good from bad: differential activation of human cortical areas by positive and negative outcomes , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[13]  D E Sherwood,et al.  Effect of Bandwidth Knowledge of Results on Movement Consistency , 1988, Perceptual and motor skills.

[14]  L K Tennant,et al.  Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. , 1997, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[15]  R. West,et al.  Memory and goal setting: the response of older and younger adults to positive and objective feedback. , 2005, Psychology and aging.

[16]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Motor Control and Learning , 2006 .

[17]  G. Wulf,et al.  Enhancing the Learning of Sport Skills Through External-Focus Feedback , 2002, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. , 1990 .

[19]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Interlimb coordination: Learning and transfer under different feedback conditions , 1997 .

[20]  G Wulf,et al.  Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  R. A. Schmidt,et al.  Reducing Knowledge of Results About Relative Versus Absolute Timing: Differential Effects on Learning. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[22]  R. Singer,et al.  Motivation effects of attributions, expectancy, and achievement motivation during the learning of a novel motor task. , 1978, Journal of motor behavior.

[23]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Frequent Augmented Feedback Can Degrade Learning: Evidence and Interpretations , 1991 .

[24]  Gabriele Wulf,et al.  Self-Controlled Feedback: Does it Enhance Learning Because Performers Get Feedback When They Need It? , 2002, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[25]  C. Shea,et al.  Frequent feedback enhances complex motor skill learning. , 1998, Journal of motor behavior.

[26]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Scheduling Information Feedback to Enhance Training Effectiveness , 1991 .

[27]  D. C. Shapiro,et al.  Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: support for the guidance hypothesis. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  Gabriele Wulf,et al.  Self-Controlled Feedback Is Effective if It Is Based on the Learner's Performance , 2005, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[29]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  R. Herrnstein.  On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.