Analysis of Ride Comfort of a High-Speed Train Based on a Coupled Track-Train-Seat-Human Model with Lateral, Vertical and Roll Vibrations

To study the ride comfort of a high-speed train running at a constant speed on a tangent track, a 3D rigid-flexible coupled track-train-seat-human model was developed. The flexible carbody model consisted of six plates with out-of-plane and in-plane vibrations interconnected by artificial springs, and was calibrated using a modal test available in a published paper. The ride comfort was evaluated by total equivalent acceleration calculated by the weighted root-sum-of-square of the weighted root-mean-square of lateral, vertical and roll accelerations at the feet, seat-buttock and human-backrest interfaces. It was concluded the track rigidity had the most influence on lateral, vertical and roll vibrations of the floor above 16 Hz, but had no obvious influence on ride comfort. The flexible carbody model showed intensified floor vibration in lateral, vertical and roll directions above 8 Hz compared with the rigid one, so rigid carbody model caused great underestimation of total equivalent acceleration. The total equivalent acceleration showed increasing tendency as increasing speed. For symmetrical seat positions, the equivalent accelerations showed analogous tendency as the speed. The ride comfort at the carbody center and close to the ends was the worst. Regardless of the seat position and speed, vertical acceleration on the seat pan was the most severe, followed by the vertical acceleration at the feet. The neighbouring subject usually resulted in reduced total equivalent acceleration. The damping of the carbody effectively reduced the total equivalent acceleration for every speed. The effect of the suspension stiffness and damping on ride comfort was also studied.

[1]  V K Garg,et al.  Dynamics of railway vehicle systems , 1984 .

[2]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Handbook of Human Vibration , 1990 .

[3]  Klaus Knothe,et al.  Modelling of Railway Track and Vehicle/Track Interaction at High Frequencies , 1993 .

[4]  Pelle F. Carlbom.  Combining MBS with FEM for Rail Vehicle Dynamics Analysis , 2001 .

[5]  Mats Berg,et al.  Passengers, Seats and Carbody in Rail Vehicle Dynamics , 2002 .

[6]  A. H. Wickens,et al.  Fundamentals of Rail Vehicle Dynamics , 2003 .

[7]  Tadao Takigami,et al.  Three-dimensional Flexural Vibration of Lightweight Railway Vehicle Carbody and a New Analytical Method for Flexural Vibration , 2003 .

[8]  Jianhui Lin,et al.  Modelling and experiment of railway ballast vibrations , 2004 .

[9]  D J Thompson,et al.  Fundamentals of Rail Vehicle Dynamics: Guidance and Stability , 2004 .

[10]  Tadao Takigami,et al.  Numerical analysis of three-dimensional flexural vibration of railway vehicle car body , 2006 .

[11]  Frederic Ward Williams,et al.  Symplectic analysis of vertical random vibration for coupled vehicle–track systems , 2008 .

[12]  Wanming Zhai,et al.  Fundamentals of vehicle–track coupled dynamics , 2009 .

[13]  Roger M. Goodall,et al.  Influences of car body vertical flexibility on ride quality of passenger railway vehicles , 2009 .

[14]  Federico Cheli,et al.  On rail vehicle vibrations induced by track unevenness: Analysis of the excitation mechanism , 2011 .

[15]  Stefano Bruni,et al.  The influence of track modelling options on the simulation of rail vehicle dynamics , 2012 .

[16]  Yan Zhao,et al.  Riding comfort optimization of railway trains based on pseudo-excitation method and symplectic method , 2013 .

[17]  Dao Gong,et al.  Vertical random vibration analysis of vehicle–track coupled system using Green's function method , 2014 .

[18]  Cao Hui,et al.  Vertical Vibration Analysis of the Flexible Carbody of High Speed Train , 2015 .

[19]  Xinbiao Xiao,et al.  Integration of car-body flexibility into train–track coupling system dynamics analysis , 2018 .

[20]  Y. Qiu,et al.  Modelling of a train seat with subject exposed to lateral, vertical and roll vibration , 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.