Taking control over microbial populations: Current approaches for exploiting biological noise in bioprocesses

Phenotypic plasticity of microbial cells has attracted much attention and several research efforts have been dedicated to the description of methods aiming at characterizing phenotypic heterogeneity and its impact on microbial populations. However, different approaches have also been suggested in order to take benefit from noise in a bioprocess perspective, e.g. by increasing the robustness or productivity of a microbial population. This review is dedicated to outline these controlling methods. A common issue, that has still to be addressed, is the experimental identification and the mathematical expression of noise. Indeed, the effective interfacing of microbial physiology with external parameters that can be used for controlling physiology depends on the acquisition of reliable signals. Latest technologies, like single cell microfluidics and advanced flow cytometric approaches, enable linking physiology, noise, heterogeneity in productive microbes with environmental cues and hence allow correctly mapping and predicting biological behavior via mathematical representations. However, like in the field of electronics, signals are perpetually subjected to noise. If appropriately interpreted, this noise can give an additional insight into the behavior of the individual cells within a microbial population of interest. This review focuses on recent progress made at describing, treating and exploiting biological noise in the context of microbial populations used in various bioprocess applications.

[1]  Ido Golding,et al.  Genetic Determinants and Cellular Constraints in Noisy Gene Expression , 2013, Science.

[2]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Every Cell Is Special: Genome-wide Studies Add a New Dimension to Single-Cell Biology , 2014, Cell.

[3]  R. Milo What is the total number of protein molecules per cell volume? A call to rethink some published values , 2013, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[4]  Remy Chait,et al.  Building a morbidostat: an automated continuous-culture device for studying bacterial drug resistance under dynamically sustained drug inhibition. , 2013, Nature protocols.

[5]  Martin Ackermann,et al.  A growing focus on bacterial individuality. , 2015, Environmental microbiology.

[6]  Adrian V. Lee,et al.  Identifying and Quantifying Heterogeneity in High Content Analysis: Application of Heterogeneity Indices to Drug Discovery , 2014, PloS one.

[7]  Wolfgang Wiechert,et al.  Microfluidic growth chambers with optical tweezers for full spatial single-cell control and analysis of evolving microbes. , 2013, Journal of microbiological methods.

[8]  C. Rao,et al.  Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise , 2002, Nature.

[9]  J. Collins,et al.  Programmable cells: interfacing natural and engineered gene networks. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Yutaka Hori,et al.  A population‐based temporal logic gate for timing and recording chemical events , 2016, Molecular systems biology.

[11]  Martin Ackermann,et al.  A functional perspective on phenotypic heterogeneity in microorganisms , 2015, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[12]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  CellProfiler Tracer: exploring and validating high-throughput, time-lapse microscopy image data , 2015, BMC Bioinformatics.

[13]  A. Schmid,et al.  Microfluidic single-cell analysis links boundary environments and individual microbial phenotypes. , 2015, Environmental microbiology.

[14]  Yingying Wang,et al.  Flow cytometry for fast microbial community fingerprinting. , 2012, Water research.

[15]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[16]  S. Sørensen,et al.  A low-cost, multiplexable, automated flow cytometry procedure for the characterization of microbial stress dynamics in bioreactors , 2013, Microbial Cell Factories.

[17]  Jessica Grote,et al.  Phenotypic Heterogeneity, a Phenomenon That May Explain Why Quorum Sensing Does Not Always Result in Truly Homogenous Cell Behavior , 2015, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[18]  Sang Woo Seo,et al.  Riboselector: riboswitch-based synthetic selection device to expedite evolution of metabolite-producing microorganisms. , 2015, Methods in enzymology.

[19]  Guillaume Lambert,et al.  Memory and Fitness Optimization of Bacteria under Fluctuating Environments , 2014, PLoS genetics.

[20]  Martin Ackermann,et al.  Bacterial Ventures into Multicellularity: Collectivism through Individuality , 2015, PLoS biology.

[21]  Luis H. Reyes,et al.  Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for enhanced tolerance to hydrolysates of lignocellulosic biomass , 2013, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[22]  Jean Baudry,et al.  A Millifluidic Study of Cell-to-Cell Heterogeneity in Growth-Rate and Cell-Division Capability in Populations of Isogenic Cells of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii , 2015, PloS one.

[23]  Fuzhong Zhang,et al.  Applications and advances of metabolite biosensors for metabolic engineering. , 2015, Metabolic engineering.

[24]  Susann Müller,et al.  Viability states of bacteria—Specific mechanisms of selected probes , 2010, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[25]  A. Schmid,et al.  Single-cell analysis in biotechnology, systems biology, and biocatalysis. , 2012, Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering.

[26]  A. van Oudenaarden,et al.  Using Gene Expression Noise to Understand Gene Regulation , 2012, Science.

[27]  Alfonso Blanco-Fernández,et al.  Monitoring of Dynamic Microbiological Processes Using Real-Time Flow Cytometry , 2013, PloS one.

[28]  Christian Dusny,et al.  Isolated Microbial Single Cells and Resulting Micropopulations Grow Faster in Controlled Environments , 2012, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[29]  Patrick Fickers,et al.  Phenotypic variability in bioprocessing conditions can be tracked on the basis of on-line flow cytometry and fits to a scaling law. , 2015, Biotechnology journal.

[30]  V. de Lorenzo,et al.  Noise and robustness in prokaryotic regulatory networks. , 2010, Annual review of microbiology.

[31]  Eran Segal,et al.  Two DNA-encoded strategies for increasing expression with opposing effects on promoter dynamics and transcriptional noise , 2013, Genome research.

[32]  H. Salis The ribosome binding site calculator. , 2011, Methods in enzymology.

[33]  Yitzhak Pilpel,et al.  Noise in biological systems: pros, cons, and mechanisms of control. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[34]  Bernhard Hauer,et al.  Microbial biofilms: a concept for industrial catalysis? , 2009, Trends in biotechnology.

[35]  Megan N. McClean,et al.  Real-time optogenetic control of intracellular protein concentration in microbial cell cultures. , 2014, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[36]  S. Sørensen,et al.  Green fluorescent protein (GFP) leakage from microbial biosensors provides useful information for the evaluation of the scale-down effect. , 2011, Biotechnology journal.

[37]  Mads Kærn,et al.  Noise in eukaryotic gene expression , 2003, Nature.

[38]  V. Shahrezaei,et al.  The stochastic nature of biochemical networks. , 2008, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[39]  H. Salis,et al.  A predictive biophysical model of translational coupling to coordinate and control protein expression in bacterial operons , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[40]  Mario di Bernardo,et al.  In-Vivo Real-Time Control of Protein Expression from Endogenous and Synthetic Gene Networks , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[41]  P. Neubauer,et al.  Characterization of the response of GFP microbial biosensors sensitive to substrate limitation in scale-down bioreactors , 2011 .

[42]  Gabriele Lillacci,et al.  The signal within the noise: efficient inference of stochastic gene regulation models using fluorescence histograms and stochastic simulations , 2013, Bioinform..

[43]  P. Dennis,et al.  Feedback control of ribosome function in Escherichia coli. , 2008, Biochimie.

[44]  T. Woyke,et al.  Single-cell Sequencing of Thiomargarita Reveals Genomic Flexibility for Adaptation to Dynamic Redox Conditions , 2016, Front. Microbiol..

[45]  D. Pincus,et al.  In silico feedback for in vivo regulation of a gene expression circuit , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[46]  Robert T Sauer,et al.  Engineering controllable protein degradation. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[47]  A. Schmid,et al.  Making variability less variable: matching expression system and host for oxygenase-based biotransformations , 2015, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

[48]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Noise in protein expression scales with natural protein abundance , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[49]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  Analysis and design of a genetic circuit for dynamic metabolic engineering. , 2013, ACS synthetic biology.

[50]  E. Segal,et al.  Poly(da:dt) Tracts: Major Determinants of Nucleosome Organization This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Protein-nucleic Acid Interactions Edited , 2022 .

[51]  U. Alon,et al.  A Genome-Wide Analysis of Promoter-Mediated Phenotypic Noise in Escherichia coli , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[52]  Cleo Kontoravdi,et al.  Genetically-encoded biosensors for monitoring cellular stress in bioprocessing. , 2015, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[53]  D. Kohlheyer,et al.  Modeling and CFD simulation of nutrient distribution in picoliter bioreactors for bacterial growth studies on single-cell level. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[54]  Bernhard Sonnleitner,et al.  Real-time on-line flow cytometry for bioprocess monitoring. , 2011, Journal of biotechnology.

[55]  U. Alon Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[56]  Víctor de Lorenzo,et al.  CellShape: A user-friendly image analysis tool for quantitative visualization of bacterial cell factories inside. , 2017, Biotechnology journal.

[57]  Peter M. A. Sloot,et al.  Promoter Sequence Determines the Relationship between Expression Level and Noise , 2013, PLoS biology.

[58]  F. Delvigne,et al.  Microbial heterogeneity affects bioprocess robustness: Dynamic single‐cell analysis contributes to understanding of microbial populations , 2014, Biotechnology journal.

[59]  Julia Frunzke,et al.  Light-Controlled Cell Factories: Employing Photocaged Isopropyl-β-d-Thiogalactopyranoside for Light-Mediated Optimization of lac Promoter-Based Gene Expression and (+)-Valencene Biosynthesis in Corynebacterium glutamicum , 2016, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[60]  Alexander Grünberger,et al.  Application of Mini- and Micro-Bioreactors for Microbial Bioprocesses , 2017 .

[61]  Philippe Nghe,et al.  Single-Cell Dynamics Reveals Sustained Growth during Diauxic Shifts , 2013, PloS one.

[62]  Johan Paulsson,et al.  Separating intrinsic from extrinsic fluctuations in dynamic biological systems , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  Eugenio Cinquemani,et al.  What Population Reveals about Individual Cell Identity: Single-Cell Parameter Estimation of Models of Gene Expression in Yeast , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[64]  M. Lidstrom,et al.  The role of physiological heterogeneity in microbial population behavior. , 2010, Nature chemical biology.

[65]  Wolfgang Wiechert,et al.  Vizardous: interactive analysis of microbial populations with single cell resolution , 2015, Bioinform..

[66]  Arunima Chaudhuri,et al.  Cell Biology by the Numbers , 2016, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[67]  Jeffrey J. Tabor,et al.  FlowCal: A User-Friendly, Open Source Software Tool for Automatically Converting Flow Cytometry Data from Arbitrary to Calibrated Units. , 2016, ACS synthetic biology.

[68]  A. Schmid,et al.  Characterization of a biofilm membrane reactor and its prospects for fine chemical synthesis , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[69]  Francisco Bolívar,et al.  Transcriptional and metabolic response of recombinant Escherichia coli to spatial dissolved oxygen tension gradients simulated in a scale-down system. , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[70]  Tamir Tuller,et al.  Estimation of ribosome profiling performance and reproducibility at various levels of resolution , 2016, Biology Direct.

[71]  N. Le Meur Computational methods for evaluation of cell-based data assessment--Bioconductor. , 2013, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[72]  Wolfgang Wiechert,et al.  Spatiotemporal microbial single‐cell analysis using a high‐throughput microfluidics cultivation platform , 2015, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[73]  Nathalie Q Balaban,et al.  Single-cell protein induction dynamics reveals a period of vulnerability to antibiotics in persister bacteria , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[74]  Tamir Tuller,et al.  Predictive biophysical modeling and understanding of the dynamics of mRNA translation and its evolution , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[75]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Noise–mean relationship in mutated promoters , 2012, Genome research.

[76]  Nicolas Perry,et al.  Biological noise abatement: coordinating the responses of autonomous bacteria in a synthetic biofilm to a fluctuating environment using a stochastic bistable switch. , 2014, ACS synthetic biology.

[77]  Nolwenn Le Meur,et al.  Computational methods for evaluation of cell-based data assessment--Bioconductor. , 2013 .

[78]  T. Hübschmann,et al.  Phenotypic heterogeneity in metabolic traits among single cells of a rare bacterial species in its natural environment quantified with a combination of flow cell sorting and NanoSIMS , 2015, Front. Microbiol..

[79]  M. di Bernardo,et al.  In Vivo Real-Time Control of Gene Expression: A Comparative Analysis of Feedback Control Strategies in Yeast. , 2016, ACS synthetic biology.

[80]  D. Gillespie Approximate accelerated stochastic simulation of chemically reacting systems , 2001 .

[81]  Brian Munsky,et al.  Listening to the noise: random fluctuations reveal gene network parameters , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[82]  S. Müller,et al.  Microbes' heterogeneousness - a focus issue on cytometric technologies in microbial single cell analytics. , 2009, Biotechnology journal.

[83]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Cellular Decision Making and Biological Noise: From Microbes to Mammals , 2011, Cell.

[84]  P. Swain,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[85]  J. Derisi,et al.  Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise , 2006, Nature.

[86]  Uwe Schröder,et al.  Cytometric fingerprints: evaluation of new tools for analyzing microbial community dynamics , 2014, Front. Microbiol..

[87]  Bernhard Sonnleitner,et al.  Development and laboratory‐scale testing of a fully automated online flow cytometer for drinking water analysis , 2012, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[88]  Julia Frunzke,et al.  Transcription factor-based biosensors in biotechnology: current state and future prospects , 2015, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[89]  Friedrich Srienc,et al.  Single-cell variability in growing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell populations measured with automated flow cytometry. , 2004, Journal of biotechnology.

[90]  Ovidiu Radulescu,et al.  Reconciling molecular regulatory mechanisms with noise patterns of bacterial metabolic promoters in induced and repressed states , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[91]  U. Alon,et al.  Correction: A Genome-Wide Analysis of Promoter-Mediated Phenotypic Noise in Escherichia coli , 2012, PLoS Genetics.

[92]  A. Schmid,et al.  The MOX promoter in Hansenula polymorpha is ultrasensitive to glucose-mediated carbon catabolite repression. , 2016, FEMS yeast research.

[93]  E. H. Dunlop,et al.  Micromixing in fermentors: Metabolic changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their relationship to fluid turbulence , 1990, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[94]  Bruno M. C. Martins,et al.  Microbial individuality: how single-cell heterogeneity enables population level strategies. , 2015, Current opinion in microbiology.

[95]  Wolfgang Wiechert,et al.  Single-cell microfluidics: opportunity for bioprocess development. , 2014, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[96]  Friedrich Srienc,et al.  Mammalian cell culture scale-up and fed-batch control using automated flow cytometry. , 2008, Journal of biotechnology.

[97]  D. Beebe,et al.  Physics and applications of microfluidics in biology. , 2002, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[98]  Shuichi Shoji,et al.  Culture-independent method for identification of microbial enzyme-encoding genes by activity-based single-cell sequencing using a water-in-oil microdroplet platform , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[99]  Jan Kok,et al.  Bet-hedging during bacterial diauxic shift , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[100]  Alvaro R. Lara,et al.  Vitreoscilla hemoglobin expression in engineered Escherichia coli: improved performance in high cell-density batch cultivations. , 2011, Biotechnology journal.

[101]  Jacob Beal,et al.  Reproducibility of Fluorescent Expression from Engineered Biological Constructs in E. coli , 2016, PloS one.

[102]  F. Delvigne,et al.  Dynamic single-cell analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under process perturbation: comparison of different methods for monitoring the intensity of population heterogeneity , 2015 .

[103]  Mark P. Styczynski,et al.  Precision metabolic engineering: The design of responsive, selective, and controllable metabolic systems. , 2015, Metabolic engineering.

[104]  F. Cross,et al.  Nucleosome-depleted regions in cell-cycle-regulated promoters ensure reliable gene expression in every cell cycle. , 2010, Developmental cell.

[105]  D. Kohlheyer,et al.  Photocaged Arabinose: A Novel Optogenetic Switch for Rapid and Gradual Control of Microbial Gene Expression , 2016, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[106]  P. Thonart,et al.  Flow cytometry community fingerprinting and amplicon sequencing for the assessment of landfill leachate cellulolytic bioaugmentation. , 2016, Bioresource technology.

[107]  Patrick Fickers,et al.  Microbial population heterogeneity versus bioreactor heterogeneity: Evaluation of Redox Sensor Green as an exogenous metabolic biosensor , 2016 .

[108]  Frank Delvigne,et al.  A methodology for the design of scale-down bioreactors by the use of mixing and circulation stochastic models , 2006 .

[109]  A. Schmid,et al.  Variability in subpopulation formation propagates into biocatalytic variability of engineered Pseudomonas putida strains , 2015, Front. Microbiol..

[110]  Irene M. Brockman,et al.  Dynamic metabolic engineering: New strategies for developing responsive cell factories , 2015, Biotechnology journal.

[111]  Ralf Takors,et al.  Engineering E. coli for large-scale production - Strategies considering ATP expenses and transcriptional responses. , 2016, Metabolic engineering.

[112]  B. Bühler,et al.  Accurate determination of plasmid copy number of flow-sorted cells using droplet digital PCR. , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[113]  P. Weber,et al.  NanoSIP: NanoSIMS applications for microbial biology. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[114]  John Lygeros,et al.  Iterative experiment design guides the characterization of a light-inducible gene expression circuit , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[115]  R. Milo,et al.  Visual account of protein investment in cellular functions , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[116]  J. Twizere,et al.  Scale-down effect on the extracellular proteome of Escherichia coli: correlation with membrane permeability and modulation according to substrate heterogeneities , 2014, Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering.

[117]  F. Srienc,et al.  Rapid strain improvement through optimized evolution in the cytostat , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[118]  L. Eggeling,et al.  Novel screening methods--biosensors. , 2015, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[119]  B. Cui,et al.  Optogenetic control of intracellular signaling pathways. , 2015, Trends in biotechnology.

[120]  Christin Koch,et al.  CHIC—an automated approach for the detection of dynamic variations in complex microbial communities , 2013, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[121]  Jane Kondev,et al.  Regulation of noise in gene expression. , 2013, Annual review of biophysics.

[122]  Eric Klavins,et al.  Fine-tuning gene networks using simple sequence repeats , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[123]  Matthias Heinemann,et al.  Phenotypic bistability in Escherichia coli's central carbon metabolism , 2014, Molecular systems biology.

[124]  Frank Delvigne,et al.  Metabolic variability in bioprocessing: implications of microbial phenotypic heterogeneity. , 2014, Trends in biotechnology.

[125]  Cees Haringa,et al.  Euler-Lagrange analysis towards representative down-scaling of a 22 m3 aerobic S. cerevisiae fermentation , 2017 .

[126]  M. Khammash,et al.  The finite state projection algorithm for the solution of the chemical master equation. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[127]  Katharina Nöh,et al.  Application of a Genetically Encoded Biosensor for Live Cell Imaging of L-Valine Production in Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex-Deficient Corynebacterium glutamicum Strains , 2014, PloS one.

[128]  M. Khammash,et al.  Automated optogenetic feedback control for precise and robust regulation of gene expression and cell growth , 2016, Nature Communications.

[129]  David G. Weissbrodt,et al.  The feasibility of automated online flow cytometry for in-situ monitoring of microbial dynamics in aquatic ecosystems , 2014, Front. Microbiol..

[130]  Jay D. Keasling,et al.  Engineering Static and Dynamic Control of Synthetic Pathways , 2010, Cell.

[131]  T. Terwilliger,et al.  Engineering and characterization of a superfolder green fluorescent protein , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[132]  Valerie C. Coffman,et al.  Every laboratory with a fluorescence microscope should consider counting molecules , 2014, Molecular biology of the cell.

[133]  Luis H. Reyes,et al.  Visualizing evolution in real time to determine the molecular mechanisms of n-butanol tolerance in Escherichia coli. , 2012, Metabolic engineering.

[134]  S. Shoji,et al.  Droplet-based microfluidics for high-throughput screening of a metagenomic library for isolation of microbial enzymes. , 2015, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[135]  S. Banwart,et al.  Biofilm formation in environmental bacteria is influenced by different macromolecules depending on genus and species. , 2010, Environmental microbiology.

[136]  Jian Xu,et al.  Single cell Raman spectroscopy for cell sorting and imaging. , 2012, Current opinion in biotechnology.