Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make?

This paper uses an analysis of developments in aircraft engine control systems to explore the implications of specialization in knowledge production for the organization and the boundaries of the firm. We argue that the definition of boundaries of the firm in terms of the activities performed in house does not take into account that decisions to outsource production and other functions are different from decisions to outsource technological knowledge. We show that multitechnology firms need to have knowledge in excess of what they need for what they make, to cope with imbalances caused by uneven rates of development in the technologies on which they rely and with unpredictable product-level interdependences. By knowing more, multitechnology firms can coordinate loosely coupled networks of suppliers of equipment, components, and specialized knowledge and maintain a capability for systems integration. Networks enable them to benefit from the advantages of both integration and specialization. Examples from other industries extend to other contexts the model we develop.

[1]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[2]  C. Perrow.  A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[3]  David S. Landes,et al.  The Unbound Prometheus , 1969 .

[4]  O. Williamson.  The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations , 1971 .

[5]  G. Richardson,et al.  The Organisation of Industry , 1972 .

[6]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[7]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Perspectives on Technology. , 1978 .

[8]  Kirk Monteverde,et al.  You have printed the following article : Supplier Switching Costs and Vertical Integration in the Automobile Industry , 2007 .

[9]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Change in organizations , 1982 .

[10]  D. Mowery.  The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900-1940 , 1983 .

[11]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  The propensity to patent , 1983 .

[12]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[13]  B. Clark,et al.  The higher education system : academic organization in cross-national perspective , 1984 .

[14]  James A. Perkins,et al.  The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective , 1985 .

[15]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Patents and multinational corporations: Results from questionnaires , 1985 .

[16]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[17]  E. Hippel.  Cooperation between Rivals: Informal Know-How Trading , 1987 .

[18]  W. Dugger.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[19]  Jack D. Mattingly,et al.  Aircraft engine design , 1987 .

[20]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[21]  K. Weick,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .

[22]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[23]  G. Pisano.  The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[24]  R. Langlois,et al.  Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries , 1992 .

[25]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technology and enterprise in a historical perspective , 1992 .

[26]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[27]  Richard N. Langlois,et al.  Cognition and Capabilities: Opportunities Seized and Missed in the History of the Computer Industry , 1994 .

[28]  Ashish Arora,et al.  The Changing Technology of Technical Change , 1994 .

[29]  A. Arora,et al.  The changing technology of technological change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of , 1994 .

[30]  Parimal Patel,et al.  The continuing, widespread (and neglected) importance of improvements in mechanical technologies , 1994 .

[31]  R. Langlois,et al.  Innovation, Networks, and Vertical Integration , 1995 .

[32]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[33]  Franco Malerba,et al.  The Dynamics and Evolution of Industries , 1996 .

[34]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  The Development Factory: Unlocking the Potential of Process Innovation , 1996 .

[35]  A. Gambardella,et al.  Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry , 1998 .

[36]  K. Pavitt.  Technologies, Products and Organization in the Innovating Firm: What Adam Smith Tells Us and Joseph Schumpeter Doesn't , 1998 .

[37]  Europe and developing countries in the globalised information economy , 1999 .

[38]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Sources of Industrial Leadership , 1999 .

[39]  Roberto Mazzoleni,et al.  Sources of Industrial Leadership: Innovation in the Machine Tool Industry: A Historical Perspective on the Dynamics of Comparative Advantage , 1999 .

[40]  楠木 建,et al.  The modularity trap : innovation, technology phase-shifts, and resulting limits of virtual organizations , 1999 .

[41]  A. Davies.  Innovation and Competitiveness in Complex Product Systems: the Case of Mobile Phone Systems , 1999 .

[42]  B. Kogut.  The network as knowledge : Generative rules and the emergence of structure , 2000 .

[43]  Qing Wang,et al.  Complexity and the functions of the firm : breadth and depth , 2000 .

[44]  Andrea Prencipe,et al.  Breadth and depth of technological capabilities in CoPS: the case of the aircraft engine control system , 2000 .

[45]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The power of modularity , 2000 .

[46]  Massimo Riccaboni,et al.  Technological change and network dynamics: Lessons from the pharmaceutical industry , 2001 .

[47]  S. Brusoni,et al.  Unpacking the Black Box of Modularity: Technologies, Products and Organizations , 2001 .

[48]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and Utilization , 2001 .