Kiasu Tendency and Tactics: A Study of their Impact on Task Performance

Kiasu reflects an “obsessive concern with getting the most out of every transaction and a desire to get ahead of others” (Hwang, Ang, & Francesco, 2002: 75). It can have both positive and negative effects. This paper generates three hypotheses about kiasuism and task performance. Using hierarchical regression to analyze the results of a survey of 261 senior-level undergraduate business students in the United States, all three hypotheses are supported. The results indicate that the kiasu construct is generalizable to the United States, and that the key to obtaining competitive advantage through kiasuism lies in selecting and implementing the right tactic for the situation.

[1]  B Thornton,et al.  Personality correlates of the Hypercompetitive Attitude Scale: validity tests of Horney's theory of neurosis. , 1994, Journal of personality assessment.

[2]  R. Ryckman,et al.  Differences in Hypercompetitive Attitude between American and Dutch University Students , 1992 .

[3]  M. K. D. Vries,et al.  Top Executive Locus of Control and Its Relationship to Strategy-Making, Structure, and Environment , 1982 .

[4]  E. Morrison,et al.  Longitudinal study of the effects of information seeking on newcomer socialization , 1993 .

[5]  Robert Hogan,et al.  The construct validity of social desirability. , 1990 .

[6]  J. Ho,et al.  A preliminary study of kiasu behaviour ‐ is it unique to Singapore? , 1998 .

[7]  Elazar J. Pedhazur,et al.  Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach , 1994 .

[8]  Jennifer Taub,et al.  Assessing the costs, benefits, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit of psychological assessment: we should, we can, and here's how. , 2003, Psychological assessment.

[9]  J. Michael Crant,et al.  The Proactive Personality Scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. , 1995 .

[10]  R. Ryckman,et al.  Values of hypercompetitive and personal development competitive individuals. , 1997, Journal of personality assessment.

[11]  B. Schneider Interactional psychology and organizational behavior. , 1982 .

[12]  W. Reynolds Development of reliable and valid short forms of the marlowe-crowne social desirability scale , 1982 .

[13]  Soon Ang,et al.  The Silent Chinese: The Influence of Face and Kiasuism on Student Feedback-Seeking Behaviors , 2002 .

[14]  J. Hunsley,et al.  The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues. , 2003, Psychological assessment.

[15]  Chris Papenhausen,et al.  Half full or half empty: The effects of top managers’ dispositional optimism on strategic decision-making and firm performance , 2006 .

[16]  M. Hammer,et al.  Construction of a Hypercompetitive Attitude Scale , 1990 .

[17]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Eric G. Kirby,et al.  A Study of the Effectiveness of Training Proactive Thinking1 , 2002 .

[19]  L. Sechrest Incremental Validity : a Recommendation , 1963 .

[20]  Maria L. Kraimer,et al.  Proactive personality and career success. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  A. Kohn No Contest: The Case Against Competition , 1986 .

[22]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[23]  H. Eysenck A short questionnaire for the measurement of two dimensions of personality. , 1958 .

[24]  Karen Horney,et al.  The Neurotic Personality of Our Time , 1937 .

[25]  Sharon Foley,et al.  The Effect of Peer Evaluations on Student Reports of Learning in a Team Environment: A Procedural Justice Perspective , 2005 .

[26]  Alvin Hwang,et al.  Adventure learning: competitive (Kiasu) attitudes and teamwork , 2003 .

[27]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Personality and social behavior , 1985 .

[28]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[30]  M. Bing,et al.  Hypercompetitiveness in academia: achieving criterion-related validity from item context specificity. , 1999, Journal of personality assessment.

[31]  J. Hunter,et al.  Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance , 1984 .

[32]  S. Ashford,et al.  Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of desire for control. , 1996 .