Temporal Filtering to Improve Single Molecule Identification in High Background Samples

Single molecule localization microscopy is currently revolutionizing the life sciences as it offers, for the first time, insights into the organization of biological samples below the classical diffraction limit of light microscopy. While there have been numerous examples of new biological findings reported in the last decade, the technique could not reach its full potential due to a set of limitations immanent to the samples themselves. Particularly, high background signals impede the proper performance of most single-molecule identification and localization algorithms. One option is to exploit the characteristic blinking of single molecule signals, which differs substantially from the residual brightness fluctuations of the fluorescence background. To pronounce single molecule signals, we used a temporal high-pass filtering in Fourier space on a pixel-by-pixel basis. We evaluated the performance of temporal filtering by assessing statistical parameters such as true positive rate and false discovery rate. For this, ground truth signals were generated by simulations and overlaid onto experimentally derived movies of samples with high background signals. Compared to the nonfiltered case, we found an improvement of the sensitivity by up to a factor 3.5 while no significant change in the localization accuracy was observable.

[1]  Andersson,et al.  Autofluorescence of living cells , 1998, Journal of microscopy.

[2]  F. Simmel,et al.  Single-molecule kinetics and super-resolution microscopy by fluorescence imaging of transient binding on DNA origami. , 2010, Nano letters.

[3]  Daniel T Chiu,et al.  Deconvolving single-molecule intensity distributions for quantitative microscopy measurements. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[4]  Keith A. Lidke,et al.  Fast, single-molecule localization that achieves theoretically minimum uncertainty , 2010, Nature Methods.

[5]  S. Holden,et al.  DAOSTORM: an algorithm for high- density super-resolution microscopy , 2011, Nature Methods.

[6]  H. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Optimized localization-analysis for single-molecule tracking and super-resolution microscopy , 2010, Nature Methods.

[7]  R. Hochstrasser,et al.  Wide-field subdiffraction imaging by accumulated binding of diffusing probes , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Yongxiang Gao,et al.  Accurate detection and complete tracking of large populations of features in three dimensions. , 2009, Optics express.

[9]  G. Bottiroli,et al.  Autofluorescence Spectroscopy and Imaging: A Tool for Biomedical Research and Diagnosis , 2014, European journal of histochemistry : EJH.

[10]  Jerilyn A Timlin,et al.  Hyperspectral fluorescence microscopy detects autofluorescent factors that can be exploited as a diagnostic method for Candida species differentiation , 2017, Journal of biomedical optics.

[11]  M. Sauer,et al.  Artifacts in single-molecule localization microscopy , 2015, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[12]  David Baddeley,et al.  Light-induced dark states of organic fluochromes enable 30 nm resolution imaging in standard media. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[13]  Suliana Manley,et al.  Superresolution imaging using single-molecule localization. , 2010, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[14]  Christophe Leterrier,et al.  NanoJ-SQUIRREL: quantitative mapping and minimisation of super-resolution optical imaging artefacts , 2018, Nature Methods.

[15]  Shijie Zhao,et al.  Correlation analysis framework for localization-based superresolution microscopy , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  David P. Kreil,et al.  The Gpr1-regulated Sur7 family protein Sfp2 is required for hyphal growth and cell wall stability in the mycoparasite Trichoderma atroviride , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Serge Monneret,et al.  A Theoretical High-Density Nanoscopy Study Leads to the Design of UNLOC, a Parameter-free Algorithm. , 2018, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Kees Jalink,et al.  The fidelity of stochastic single-molecule super-resolution reconstructions critically depends upon robust background estimation , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[19]  Sjoerd Stallinga,et al.  Measuring image resolution in optical nanoscopy , 2013, Nature Methods.

[20]  Susan Cox,et al.  Artefact-free high density localization microscopy analysis , 2018 .

[21]  A. Small,et al.  Fluorophore localization algorithms for super-resolution microscopy , 2014, Nature Methods.

[22]  Yaron M Sigal,et al.  A high-density 3D localization algorithm for stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy , 2012, Optical Nanoscopy.

[23]  S. Hell,et al.  Fluorescence nanoscopy in cell biology , 2017, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[24]  M. Heilemann,et al.  Direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy with standard fluorescent probes , 2011, Nature Protocols.

[25]  M. Hausmann,et al.  Cellular Uptake of Gold Nanoparticles and Their Behavior as Labels for Localization Microscopy. , 2016, Biophysical journal.

[26]  Prabuddha Sengupta,et al.  Probing protein heterogeneity in the plasma membrane using PALM and pair correlation analysis , 2011, Nature Methods.

[27]  G. Schütz,et al.  Single Molecule Microscopy in Living Cells: Subtraction of Autofluorescence Based on Two Color Recording , 2002 .