Experiment and analysis of a leverage‐type stiffness‐controllable isolation system for seismic engineering

Owing to the fixed design parameters in traditional isolation systems, the optimal isolation performance may not always be achieved when a structure is subjected to a nondesign earthquake. At the same time, even though an active isolation system (AIS) can offer a better reduction for different seismic waves, in practice the control energy required still constrains its application. To solve this problem, a novel semi-active isolation system called the Leverage-type Stiffness Controllable Isolation System (LSCIS) is proposed in this paper. By utilizing a simple leverage mechanism, the isolation stiffness and the isolation period of the LSCIS can be easily controlled by adjusting the position of the pivot point of the leverage arm. The theoretical basis and the control law for the proposed system were first explained in this work, and then a shaking table test was conducted to verify the theory and the feasibility of the LSCIS. As shown in the experiment, the seismic behavior of the LSCIS can be successfully simulated by the theoretical model, and the isolation stiffness can be properly adjusted to reduce the seismic energy input in the LSCIS system. A comparison of the LSCIS with the other systems including passive isolation and AISs has demonstrated that based on the same limitation of base displacement, better acceleration reduction can be achieved by the LSCIS than by any of the other isolation systems. In addition, the control energy required by the LSCIS is lower than that for an AIS using the traditional LQR control algorithm. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Kazuhiko Kawashima,et al.  CONTROL OF SEISMIC-EXCITED NONLINEAR ISOLATED BRIDGES WITH VARIABLE VISCOUS DAMPERS , 2005 .

[2]  Faryar Jabbari,et al.  Application of a high‐pressure gas semi‐active resettable damper to the benchmark smart base‐isolated building , 2006 .

[3]  Shih-Po Chang,et al.  Effect of viscous, viscoplastic and friction damping on the response of seismic isolated structures , 2000 .

[4]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Sliding fragility of block‐type non‐structural components. Part 2: Restrained components , 2003 .

[5]  Samit Ray Chaudhuri,et al.  Fragility of Bench-Mounted Equipment Considering Uncertain Parameters , 2006 .

[6]  B. F. Spencer,et al.  STATE OF THE ART OF STRUCTURAL CONTROL , 2003 .

[7]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Implementation issues and testing of a hybrid sliding isolation system , 1998 .

[8]  E. C. Zacharenakis,et al.  Active control schemes for aseismic base-isolated structures , 2002 .

[9]  Mehmet Çelebi,et al.  Successful performance of a base‐isolated hospital building during the 17 January 1994 Northridge earthquake , 1996 .

[10]  Takuji Kobori,et al.  Dynamic loading test and simulation analysis of full‐scale semi‐active hydraulic damper for structural control , 2000 .

[11]  Ging Long Lin,et al.  Stiffness controllable isolation system for near-fault seismic isolation , 2008 .

[12]  Alex H. Barbat,et al.  Active Control of Nonlinear Base-Isolated Buildings , 1995 .

[13]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  Neuro-fuzzy model of hybrid semi-active base isolation system with FPS bearings and an MR damper , 2006 .

[14]  Leonard Meirovitch,et al.  Dynamics And Control Of Structures , 1990 .

[15]  Pei-Yang Lin,et al.  A comparative study in the semi-active control of isolated structures , 2007 .

[16]  Akira Mita,et al.  Active control of the seismic response of structures by combined use of base isolation and absorbing boundaries , 1992 .

[17]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Seismic response control of smart sliding isolated buildings using variable stiffness systems: an experimental and numerical study , 2006 .

[18]  Zhou Xu,et al.  Ground motion pulse‐based active control of a linear base‐isolated benchmark building , 2006 .

[19]  Ging Long Lin,et al.  A Theoretical Study on Piezoelectric Smart Isolation System for Seismic Protection of Equipment in Near-fault Areas , 2009 .

[20]  T. Soong,et al.  Sliding fragility of block‐type non‐structural components. Part 1: Unrestrained components , 2003 .

[21]  Ging Long Lin,et al.  Predictive control of smart isolation system for precision equipment subjected to near-fault earthquakes , 2008 .

[22]  Farzad Naeim,et al.  Design of seismic isolated structures , 1999 .

[23]  Ging Long Lin,et al.  Improvement of near-fault seismic isolation using a resettable variable stiffness damper , 2009 .

[24]  R. S. Jangid,et al.  Base isolation for near‐fault motions , 2001 .

[25]  Takuji Kobori,et al.  Seismic response controlled structure with Active Variable Stiffness system , 1993 .

[26]  Jann N. Yang,et al.  RESETTING SEMIACTIVE STIFFNESS DAMPER FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE CONTROL , 2000 .

[27]  R. Villaverde Simple method to estimate the seismic nonlinear response of nonstructural components in buildings , 2006 .