Spatial Regulation and the Rate of Signal Transduction Activation

Of the many important signaling events that take place on the surface of a mammalian cell, activation of signal transduction pathways via interactions of cell surface receptors is one of the most important. Evidence suggests that cell surface proteins are not as freely diffusible as implied by the classic fluid mosaic model and that their confinement to membrane domains is regulated. It is unknown whether these dynamic localization mechanisms function to enhance signal transduction activation rate or to minimize cross talk among pathways that share common intermediates. To determine which of these two possibilities is more likely, we derive an explicit equation for the rate at which cell surface membrane proteins interact based on a Brownian motion model in the presence of endocytosis and exocytosis. We find that in the absence of any diffusion constraints, cell surface protein interaction rate is extremely high relative to cytoplasmic protein interaction rate even in a large mammalian cell with a receptor abundance of a mere two hundred molecules. Since a larger number of downstream signaling events needs to take place, each occurring at a much slower rate than the initial activation via association of cell surface proteins, we conclude that the role of co-localization is most likely that of cross-talk reduction rather than coupling efficiency enhancement.

[1]  A Kusumi,et al.  Barriers for lateral diffusion of transferrin receptor in the plasma membrane as characterized by receptor dragging by laser tweezers: fence versus tether , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  P. V. von Hippel,et al.  Facilitated Target Location in Biological Systems* , 2022 .

[3]  D. Brown,et al.  Functions of lipid rafts in biological membranes. , 1998, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[4]  J. Koenig Assessment of receptor internalization and recycling. , 2004, Methods in molecular biology.

[5]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Single-particle tracking: applications to membrane dynamics. , 1997, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[6]  Frederick R Maxfield,et al.  Plasma membrane microdomains. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[7]  D. Goeddel,et al.  Rational design of potent antagonists to the human growth hormone receptor. , 1992, Science.

[8]  A Kusumi,et al.  Compartmentalized structure of the plasma membrane for receptor movements as revealed by a nanometer-level motion analysis , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  M. Edidin Membrane Cholesterol, Protein Phosphorylation, and Lipid Rafts , 2001, Science's STKE.

[10]  D. Dickson,et al.  Dimeric Amyloid β Protein Rapidly Accumulates in Lipid Rafts followed by Apolipoprotein E and Phosphorylated Tau Accumulation in the Tg2576 Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  W. Webb,et al.  Constrained diffusion or immobile fraction on cell surfaces: a new interpretation. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[12]  C. Heldin,et al.  Dimerization of cell surface receptors in signal transduction , 1995, Cell.

[13]  J. Neefjes,et al.  From fixed to FRAP: measuring protein mobility and activity in living cells , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[14]  Peter J Woolf,et al.  Self organization of membrane proteins via dimerization. , 2003, Biophysical chemistry.

[15]  R. Tsien,et al.  Partitioning of Lipid-Modified Monomeric GFPs into Membrane Microdomains of Live Cells , 2002, Science.

[16]  D. Siegmund,et al.  Stochastic model of protein-protein interaction: why signaling proteins need to be colocalized. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  J. Schlessinger,et al.  Signal transduction by allosteric receptor oligomerization. , 1988, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[18]  D. Dickson,et al.  Dimeric amyloid beta protein rapidly accumulates in lipid rafts followed by apolipoprotein E and phosphorylated tau accumulation in the Tg2576 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. , 2004, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  David R. Brillinger,et al.  A Particle Migrating Randomly on a Sphere , 1997 .

[20]  Jason M Haugh,et al.  Reactions on cell membranes: comparison of continuum theory and Brownian dynamics simulations. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[21]  A. Riggs,et al.  The lac represser-operator interaction , 1970 .

[22]  R Inman,et al.  Lateral diffusion of proteins in membranes. , 1987, Annual review of physiology.

[23]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Receptors: Models for Binding, Trafficking, and Signaling , 1993 .

[24]  M. Saxton Anomalous diffusion due to obstacles: a Monte Carlo study. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[25]  S. Karlin,et al.  A second course in stochastic processes , 1981 .

[26]  H V Westerhoff,et al.  Why cytoplasmic signalling proteins should be recruited to cell membranes. , 2000, Trends in cell biology.

[27]  Michel Bouvier,et al.  Oligomerization of G-protein-coupled transmitter receptors , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  L. Dagdug Book Review: Molecular Driving Forces: Statistical Thermodynamics in Chemistry and Biology. Ken A. Dill and Sarina Bromberg, Garland Science, New York, 2003 , 2003 .

[29]  P. V. von Hippel,et al.  Diffusion-controlled macromolecular interactions. , 1985, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[30]  S. Singer,et al.  The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. , 1972, Science.

[31]  A. Riggs,et al.  The lac repressor-operator interaction. 3. Kinetic studies. , 1970, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  F. Perrin,et al.  Étude mathématique du mouvement brownien de rotation , 1928 .

[33]  Michael Edidin,et al.  Lowering the barriers to random walks on the cell surface. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[34]  I. Mellman Endocytosis and molecular sorting. , 1996, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[35]  M. Edidin,et al.  Shrinking patches and slippery rafts: scales of domains in the plasma membrane. , 2001, Trends in cell biology.

[36]  P. Saffman,et al.  Brownian motion in biological membranes. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  M. Edidin The state of lipid rafts: from model membranes to cells. , 2003, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[38]  R. Lefkowitz,et al.  Differential Kinetic and Spatial Patterns of β-Arrestin and G Protein-mediated ERK Activation by the Angiotensin II Receptor* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  Peter J. Woolf,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations of receptor dynamics: Insights into cell signaling , 2004, Journal of Molecular Histology.

[40]  Arthur Weiss,et al.  Switching Signals On or Off by Receptor Dimerization , 1998, Cell.

[41]  G. Meer,et al.  The Different Hues of Lipid Rafts , 2002 .

[42]  Akihiro Kusumi,et al.  Relationship of lipid rafts to transient confinement zones detected by single particle tracking. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[43]  W. Nelson,et al.  Spatial control of exocytosis. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[44]  W E Moerner,et al.  Translational diffusion of individual class II MHC membrane proteins in cells. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[45]  H. Wiley,et al.  Cholesterol dictates the freedom of EGF receptors and HER2 in the plane of the membrane. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[46]  G. van Meer,et al.  Cell biology. The different hues of lipid rafts. , 2002, Science.

[47]  Akihiro Kusumi,et al.  Rapid hop diffusion of a G-protein-coupled receptor in the plasma membrane as revealed by single-molecule techniques. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[48]  Kai Simons,et al.  Lipid rafts and signal transduction , 2000, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[49]  K. Sandvig,et al.  Caveolae: anchored, multifunctional platforms in the lipid ocean. , 2003, Trends in cell biology.

[50]  M. Saxton Anomalous diffusion due to binding: a Monte Carlo study. , 1996, Biophysical journal.