Wear-time recording during early Class III facemask treatment using TheraMon chip technology.

Successful intervention in a developing Class III malocclusion with facemask protraction therapy depends on a patient's ability to adhere to the recommendations for duration of appliance wear. In this article, we report the introduction of a novel approach for tracking of the duration of application of a protraction facemask, with the incorporation of a "FaceMon" sensor (TheraMon, microelectronic system; MC Technology GmbH, Hargelsberg, Austria) to track wear time. A 9-year-old boy with a Class III malocclusion was successfully treated with a modified alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction protocol and intermittent application of a hybrid hyrax-protraction facemask combination. The average duration of wear of the facemask was measured at 10.8 hours per day. The use of an objective measuring device may have implications for the development of treatment strategies, since patient responses may be able to calibrated in relation to compliance.

[1]  Giuseppe Perinetti,et al.  Diagnostic performance of combined canine and second molar maturity for identification of growth phase , 2013, Progress in Orthodontics.

[2]  Shin-Jae Lee,et al.  Patient compliance and locus of control in orthodontic treatment: a prospective study. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  H. Wehrbein,et al.  Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[4]  Lucia Cevidanes,et al.  Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[5]  D. Drescher,et al.  Preprosthetic molar uprighting using skeletal anchorage. , 2013, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[6]  Kee-Joon Lee,et al.  Treatment effects of Fränkel functional regulator III in children with class III malocclusions. , 2004, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  G. Göz,et al.  Wearing times of orthodontic devices as measured by the TheraMon® microsensor , 2011, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[8]  S. Clarren,et al.  Ankylosed teeth as abutments for maxillary protraction: a case report. , 1985, American journal of orthodontics.

[9]  D. Drescher,et al.  Early Class III treatment with a hybrid hyrax-mentoplate combination. , 2011, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[10]  Benedict Wilmes,et al.  Miniscrew-supported Class III treatment with the Hybrid RPE Advancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[11]  B. Ludwig,et al.  Questionnaire study of electronic wear-time tracking as experienced by patients and parents during treatment with removable orthodontic appliances , 2013, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[12]  D. Drescher,et al.  Application and effectiveness of a mini-implant- and tooth-borne rapid palatal expansion device: the hybrid hyrax. , 2010, World journal of orthodontics.

[13]  L. Franchi,et al.  Short-term effects of a modified Alt-RAMEC protocol for early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a controlled study. , 2014, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[14]  P. Ngan,et al.  Treatment response and long-term dentofacial adaptations to maxillary expansion and protraction. , 1997, Seminars in orthodontics.

[15]  D. Drescher,et al.  Maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination , 2013, Progress in orthodontics.

[16]  B. Ludwig,et al.  Microelectronic wear-time documentation of removable orthodontic devices detects heterogeneous wear behavior and individualizes treatment planning. , 2014, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[17]  B. Braumann,et al.  Skeletal and Dental Effects of Maxillary Protraction in Patients with Angle Class III Malocclusion A Meta-Analysis , 2001, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[18]  D. Sarver,et al.  Combined rapid maxillary expansion and protraction facemask in the treatment of Class III malocclusions in growing children: a prospective long-term study. , 1997, Seminars in orthodontics.

[19]  M. Slakter,et al.  Reliability and stability of the orthodontic Patient Cooperation Scale. , 1980, American Journal of Orthodontics.

[20]  P. Henry Clinical Experiences with Dental Implants , 1999, Advances in dental research.

[21]  J. McNamara,et al.  Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[22]  S. Uckan,et al.  Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage. , 2011, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[23]  M. Ackerman,et al.  Posttreatment compliance with removable maxillary retention in a teenage population: a short-term randomized clinical trial. , 2011, Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement.

[24]  I. Kocadereli,et al.  Effects of facemask treatment anchored with miniplates after alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions; a pilot study. , 2011, The Angle orthodontist.

[25]  D. Drescher,et al.  The Hybrid Hyrax Distalizer, a New All-in-one Appliance for Rapid Palatal Expansion, Early Class III Treatment and upper Molar Distalization , 2014, Journal of orthodontics.

[26]  D. Drescher,et al.  A miniplate system for improved stability of skeletal anchorage. , 2009, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[27]  E. Liou Effective maxillary orthopedic protraction for growing Class III patients: a clinical application simulates distraction osteogenesis. , 2005, Progress in orthodontics.

[28]  Benedict Wilmes,et al.  A miniscrew system with interchangeable abutments. , 2008, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[29]  D. Drescher,et al.  Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination: a controlled clinical study. , 2015, The Angle orthodontist.

[30]  P. Pazera,et al.  Objective assessment of patient compliance with removable orthodontic appliances: a cross-sectional cohort study. , 2014, The Angle orthodontist.

[31]  J A McNamara,et al.  Skeletal effects of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.