Long-term trends in paleointensity: The contribution of DSDP/ODP submarine basaltic glass collections

Abstract The Deep Sea Drilling Project and the Ocean Drilling Program have been collecting fresh appearing submarine basaltic glass from the world’s oceans for over three decades. This glass has proved nearly ideal for estimating paleointensity variations of the Earth’s magnetic field. We compile here data for 726 paleointensity experiments from six publications on paleointensity using DSDP/ODP glass. We also include new data for an additional 225 specimens. These were obtained through the so-called “IZZI” paleointensity experiment of [Tauxe, L., Staudigel, H., 2004. Strength of the geomagnetic field in the cretaceous normal superchron: new data from submarine basaltic glass of the troodos ophiolite. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 5 (2), Q02H06, doi:10.1029/2003GC000635 ] whereby infield-zerofield steps are alternated with the zerofield-infield steps to enhance quality assessment of the resulting data. The entire collection of data from 951 experiments was prepared for uploading to the MagIC data base ( http://earthref.org ), including original measurements, interpretations, and useful metadata. Excellent results were obtained throughout the depth ( > 1400  mbsf) and age (0–160 Ma) range sampled. DSDP/ODP glass data are compared with published paleointensity data meeting minimal acceptance criteria from the time interval 1–160 Ma. Paleolatitudes were estimated for all cooling units in a self-consistent manner for use in calculating virtual axial dipole moments. We conclude: (1) There is about a 20% difference in mean values between the SBG and the lava flow data ( 48 ± 36 and 57 ± 29  ZAm2 respectively). The difference is caused by the fact that there are more higher values in the lava flow data than in the SBG data set rather than a difference in the minimum values. Lava flows cooling over a periods of days to months can account for the discrepancy. (2) The positive relationship between polarity interval length and average paleofield intensity first hypothesized by [Cox, A.V., 1968. Lengths of geomagnetic polarity intervals. J. Geophys. Res. 73, 3247–3260] is supported by data compiled here. The Brunhes data (for which we have only a minimum estimate for polarity interval length) are consistent with a long polarity interval, suggesting that instead of racing toward reversal [Hulot, G., Eymin, C., Langlais, B., Mandea, M., Olsen, N., 2002. Small-scale structure of the geodynamo inferred from oersted and magsat satellite data. Nature 416, 620–623], we could instead be in the midst of a long stable polarity interval. (3) Because the average value appears to be a function of polarity interval length, it is probably not useful to calculate a mean value. Nonetheless, it appears that most of the time (apart from the Brunhes and the longest polarity intervals), the average dipole moment is substantially less than the present day value as suggested by [Juarez, T., Tauxe, L., Gee, J.S., Pick, T., 1998. The intensity of the earth’s magnetic field over the past 160 million years. Nature 394, 878–881].

[1]  P. Riisager,et al.  Palaeointensity of West Greenland Palaeocene basalts: asymmetric intensity around the C27n–C26r transition , 2000 .

[2]  Marie-Pierre Aubry,et al.  A revised Cenozoic geochronology and chronostratigraphy , 1995 .

[3]  L. Tauxe,et al.  11 MILLION YEARS OF OLIGOCENE GEOMAGNETIC FIELD BEHAVIOUR , 1997 .

[4]  R. Voo,et al.  Single-domain and superparamagnetic titanomagnetite with variable Ti content in young ocean-floor basalts: No evidence for rapid alteration , 1997 .

[5]  D. Kent,et al.  Paleointensity record in zero-age submarine basalt glasses: testing a new dating technique for recent MORBs , 2000 .

[6]  R. Carlson,et al.  East Mariana Basin tholeiites: Cretaceous intraplate basalts or rift basalts related to the Ontong Java plume? , 1994 .

[7]  M. Perrin,et al.  Paleointensity of the Earth's Magnetic Field for the Past 400 Ma : Evidence for a Dipole Structure during the Mesozoic Low , 1997 .

[8]  M. Prévôt,et al.  The Steens Mountain (Oregon) geomagnetic polarity transition: 2. Field intensity variations and discussion of reversal models , 1985 .

[9]  J. Kirschvink The least-squares line and plane and the analysis of palaeomagnetic data , 1980 .

[10]  M. Steiner,et al.  24. PALEOMAGNETISM OF CRETACEOUS BASALTS FROM THE EAST MARIANA BASIN, WESTERN PACIFIC OCEAN1 , 1992 .

[11]  F. Agterberg,et al.  A Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous Time Scale , 1995 .

[12]  H. Staudigel,et al.  Strength of the geomagnetic field in the Cretaceous Normal Superchron: New data from submarine basaltic glass of the Troodos Ophiolite , 2004 .

[13]  Lisa Tauxe,et al.  Paleomagnetic principles and practice , 1998 .

[14]  A. Cox Lengths of geomagnetic polarity intervals , 1968 .

[15]  Jean Besse,et al.  Apparent and true polar wander and the geometry of the geomagnetic field over the last 200 Myr , 2002 .

[16]  P. L. Mcfadden,et al.  The variation of intensity of earth’s magnetic field with time , 2002 .

[17]  Richard G. Gordon,et al.  Current plate motions , 1990 .

[18]  M. Prévôt,et al.  Intensity of the Earth's magnetic field: Evidence for a Mesozoic dipole low , 1990 .

[19]  T. Lee,et al.  Cenozoic plate reconstruction of Southeast Asia , 1995 .

[20]  Lisa Tauxe,et al.  Long-term variations in palaeointensity , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[21]  Mereille Perrin,et al.  Paleointensity database updated , 1998 .

[22]  L. Tauxe,et al.  Characteristics of magnetite in submarine basaltic glass , 1994 .

[23]  J. Tarduno,et al.  High Geomagnetic Intensity During the Mid-Cretaceous from Thellier Analyses of Single Plagioclase Crystals , 2001, Science.

[24]  J. Urrutia‐Fucugauchi,et al.  An integrated paleomagnetic study of Rio Grande de Santiago volcanic succession (trans-Mexican volcanic belt): revisited , 2002 .

[25]  S. Bogue,et al.  DISTINCTIVE FIELD BEHAVIOR FOLLOWING GEOMAGNETIC REVERSALS , 1993 .

[26]  J. Urrutia‐Fucugauchi,et al.  Absolute geomagnetic paleointensity after the Cretaceous Normal Superchron and just prior to the Cretaceous‐Tertiary transition , 2004 .

[27]  M. Kono Intensity of the earth's magnetic field during the Pliocene and Pleistocene in relation to the amplitude of mid-ocean ridge magnetic anomalies , 1971 .

[28]  L. Tauxe,et al.  Holocene paleointensities: Thellier Experiments on submarine basaltic glass from the East Pacific Rise , 1993 .

[29]  W. Berggren,et al.  GEOCHRONOLOGY, TIME SCALES AND GLOBAL STRATIGRAPHIC CORRELATION , 1995 .

[30]  N. Opdyke,et al.  Paleomagnetic field intensity recorded in submarine basaltic glass from the East Pacific Rise, the last 69 KA , 1996 .

[31]  D. Dunlop,et al.  Magnetization changes caused by burial and uplift , 1975 .

[32]  L. Tauxe,et al.  The intensity of the time-averaged geomagnetic field: the last 5 Myr , 2000 .

[33]  R. Coe,et al.  Geomagnetic paleointensities from radiocarbon‐dated lava flows on Hawaii and the question of the Pacific nondipole low , 1978 .

[34]  A. Biggin,et al.  Analysis of long-term variations in the geomagnetic poloidal field intensity and evaluation of their relationship with global geodynamics , 2003 .

[35]  W. Sager Data Report: Paleomagnetism of Basaltic Rocks Cored from Western Pacific DSDP and ODP Boreholes , 2005 .

[36]  J. Tarduno,et al.  Magnetic hysteresis monitoring of Cretaceous submarine basaltic glass during Thellier paleointensity experiments: evidence for alteration and attendant low field bias , 2003 .

[37]  Mioara Mandea,et al.  Small-scale structure of the geodynamo inferred from Oersted and Magsat satellite data , 2002, Nature.

[38]  J. Tarduno,et al.  The Cretaceous superchron geodynamo: Observations near the tangent cylinder , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  J. Gee,et al.  The effect of remanence anisotropy on paleointensity estimates: a case study from the Archean Stillwater Complex , 2000 .

[40]  T. Nagata,et al.  Secular Variation of the Geomagnetic Total Force during the Last 5000 Years , 1963 .

[41]  J. Love,et al.  Paleointensity in Hawaiian Scientific Drilling Project Hole (HSDP2): Results from submarine basaltic glass , 2003 .

[42]  J. Gee,et al.  Cooling rate effects on paleointensity estimates in submarine basaltic glass and implications for dating young flows , 2004 .

[43]  L. Tauxe,et al.  Geomagnetic palaeointensities during the Cretaceous normal superchron measured using submarine basaltic glass , 1993, Nature.

[44]  L. Tauxe,et al.  Potbellies, wasp-waists, and superparamagnetism in magnetic hysteresis , 1996 .

[45]  M. Aitken,et al.  Cooling-rate dependence of thermoremanent magnetisation , 1980, Nature.

[46]  M. Barbetti,et al.  Weathering processes in baked sediments and their effects on archaeomagnetic field-intensity measurements , 1977 .

[47]  A. Klaus,et al.  Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results , 2001 .

[48]  M. Fuller,et al.  The effect of cooling rate on the intensity of weak‐field trm in single‐domain magnetite , 1980 .

[49]  R. Coe Paleo-intensities of the Earth's magnetic field determined from Tertiary and Quaternary rocks , 1967 .

[50]  PETER J. Smith The Intensity of the Ancient Geomagnetic Field: A Review and Analysis , 1967 .

[51]  E. Thellier,et al.  Sur l'intensite du champ magnetique terrestre dans le passe historique et geologique , 1959 .

[52]  P. Riisager,et al.  Detecting multidomain magnetic grains in Thellier palaeointensity experiments , 2001 .

[53]  Kazuo Kobayashi,et al.  Magnetic anomaly lineations from Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous in the west-central Pacific Ocean , 1992 .

[54]  M. Steiner Paleomagnetism of the Cretaceous Section, Site 462 , 1981 .

[55]  M. Hill,et al.  Comparison of the Coe–Thellier–Thellier and microwave palaeointensity techniques using high-titanium titanomagnetites: results from a Tertiary basaltic intrusion from the Sydney Basin, New South Wales , 2004 .

[56]  R. Coe The Determination of Paleo-Intensities of the Earth's Magnetic Field with Emphasis on Mechanisms which Could Cause Non-ideal Behavior in Thellier's Method , 1967 .

[57]  J. Gee,et al.  The intensity of the Earth's magnetic field over the past 160 million years , 1998, Nature.

[58]  Xixi Zhao,et al.  Cretaceous geomagnetic paleointensities: Thellier experiments on Pillow lavas and Submarine basaltic glass from the Ontong Java Plateau , 2003 .

[59]  L. Kroenke,et al.  43. A PLATE TECTONIC RECONSTRUCTION OF THE SOUTHWEST PACIFIC, 0-100 Ma1 , 1993 .

[60]  Masaru Kono,et al.  Some global features of palaeointensity in geological time , 1995 .

[61]  M. McElhinny,et al.  Variations in the Geomagnetic Dipole 2: Statistical Analysis of VDMs for the Past 5 Million Years , 1982 .

[62]  J. Gee,et al.  Magnetic alteration of zero-age oceanic basalt , 1996 .

[63]  L. Tauxe,et al.  Toward an optimal geomagnetic field intensity determination technique , 2004 .