Ultrasound positioning based on time-of-flight and signal strength

Ultrasound positioning systems for indoor use can be distinguished by what kind of information they extract from the received signal. Time-of-flight (TOF) is measured with reference to a radio signal to get ultrasound time-of- arrival (TOA). Line-of-sight to three or more nodes is required for 3D positioning. Accuracy is in the cm or sub-cm range. A radio-free alternative can be made if time-difference-of-arrival (TDOA) is measured instead. Coding of the pulse is often used in order to allow simultaneous transmission from multiple transmitters. The simplest received signal strength (RSS) systems are binary and will just determine if the ultrasound signal can be detected or not. This is used on its own for room-level positioning. Another important application is in assisting RSS-based RF-systems such as WLAN positioning. The ultrasound RSS-system helps reduce the number of large errors (5-10 m) of the WLAN-system. Such systems have recently been deployed world-wide today by companies like Sonitor and Aeroscout. It has also just been demonstrated that RSS-based ultrasound positioning can be done with accuracies in the 10 cm range. This parallels the ubiquitous RF-based RSS systems and requires a propagation model. For ultrasound the model involves spherical spreading and absorption. There are also hybrid systems where the entire echo structure in the time history of the received signal is analyzed. Both the amplitude and time information are used in order to obtain a position of the node using only a single transmitter.

[1]  M. Fink,et al.  In solid localization of finger impacts using acoustic time-reversal process , 2005 .

[2]  C. De Marziani,et al.  Performance comparison of different codes in an ultrasonic positioning system using DS-CDMA , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing.

[3]  Andreas Savvides,et al.  An Empirical Characterization of Radio Signal Strength Variability in 3-D IEEE 802.15.4 Networks Using Monopole Antennas , 2006, EWSN.

[4]  D. Wax MFSK--The Basis for Robust Acoustical Communications , 1981 .

[5]  Juan R. Gonzalez,et al.  High-Precision Robust Broadband Ultrasonic Location and Orientation Estimation , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[6]  Sverre Holm,et al.  Feasibility of ultrasound positioning based on signal strength , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN).

[7]  Feng Zhou,et al.  Keyboard acoustic emanations revisited , 2005, CCS '05.

[8]  Henk L. Muller,et al.  RF free ultrasonic positioning , 2003, Seventh IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 2003. Proceedings..

[9]  Sverre Holm,et al.  Robust ultrasonic indoor positioning using transmitter arrays , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation.

[10]  Hari Balakrishnan,et al.  6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on on Mobile Computing and Networking (ACM MOBICOM ’00) The Cricket Location-Support System , 2022 .

[11]  Sverre Holm,et al.  Hybrid ultrasound-RFID indoor positioning: Combining the best of both worlds , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on RFID.

[12]  J. Koenderink Q… , 2014, Les noms officiels des communes de Wallonie, de Bruxelles-Capitale et de la communaute germanophone.

[13]  Andy Hopper,et al.  A new location technique for the active office , 1997, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[14]  S. Holm,et al.  Airborne ultrasound data communications: the core of an indoor positioning system , 2005, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005..

[15]  Richard P. Martin,et al.  The limits of localization using signal strength: a comparative study , 2004, 2004 First Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2004. IEEE SECON 2004..

[16]  Sverre Holm,et al.  Indoors data communications using airborne ultrasound , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[17]  Franco Mazzenga,et al.  Channel models for IEEE 802.11b indoor system design , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577).

[18]  Sverre Holm,et al.  Link Budget for Low Bandwidth and Coded Ultrasonic Indoor Location Systems , 2011 .

[19]  Duncan Clarke,et al.  Active-RFID System Accuracy and Its Implications for Clinical Applications , 2006, 19th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS'06).

[20]  George S. K. Wong,et al.  Variation of the speed of sound in air with humidity and temperature , 1985 .

[21]  Ronaldus Maria Aarts,et al.  Estimation of 3D device position by analyzing ultrasonic reflection signals , 2003 .

[22]  A. J. Zuckerwar,et al.  Atmospheric absorption of sound: Further developments , 1995 .

[23]  S. Merriam,et al.  A new MFSK acoustic modem for operation in adverse underwater channels , 1997, Oceans '97. MTS/IEEE Conference Proceedings.