Determination of electron energy probability function in low-temperature plasmas from current – Voltage characteristics of two Langmuir probes filtered by Savitzky–Golay and Blackman window methods

Abstract Acceptable data for electron energy probability function (EEPF) measurement in low-pressure plasmas require a small depletion in near-zero electron energy and a large dynamic range in the high-energy regime. The voltage drop across internal resistance and noise from the data acquisition system cause a rounding of the EEPF near the zero electron energy and a reduction in the dynamic range due to a low signal-to-noise ratio of the high-energy regime, respectively, leading to erroneous interpretation in the EEPF measurement. A digital smoothing filter can be employed to reduce the noise signal, but it can also cause additional depletion near the zero energy. In order to obtain reliable EEPF data, a novel technique is proposed using two Langmuir probes with differing collecting areas and the Savitzky–Golay and Blackman window methods. The technique enables the internal resistance effect to be removed using a slope of the current – voltage characteristic taken from the probes. In addition, the Savitzky–Golay and Blackman window methods in the technique apply separately to two regimes of the EEPF, i.e., the near-zero energy regime and the inelastic energy regime, because appropriate smoothing methods that minimize loss and distortion of information differ for the two regimes. This allows one to decrease the noise signal, minimizing the additional depletion near the zero energy. This technique improves the dynamic range of the EEPF from 30 to 55 dB to 65–105 dB and provides more accurate electron density and effective electron temperature from the EEPF, compared to those of the conventional technique.

[1]  E. Shun’ko Langmuir Probe in Theory and Practice , 2009 .

[2]  Gon-Ho Kim,et al.  A New Langmuir Probe Analysis Algorithm Based on Wavelet Transforms to Obtain the Electron Energy Distribution Function of a Bi-Maxwellian Plasma , 2009 .

[3]  J. Gudmundsson,et al.  Digital smoothing of the Langmuir probe I-V characteristic. , 2008, The Review of scientific instruments.

[4]  U. Czarnetzki,et al.  Stochastic heating in asymmetric capacitively coupled RF discharges , 2008 .

[5]  H. Toyoda,et al.  Electron energy distribution functions and the influence on fluorocarbon plasma chemistry , 2001 .

[6]  Francis F. Chen Double‐Probe Method for Unstable Plasmas , 1964 .

[7]  Benjamin Alexandrovich,et al.  Electron energy distribution function measurements and plasma parameters in inductively coupled argon plasma , 2002 .

[8]  L. Jackson Digital filters and signal processing , 1985 .

[9]  M. Lieberman,et al.  Global model of Ar, O2, Cl2, and Ar/O2 high‐density plasma discharges , 1995 .

[10]  Eric W. Weisstein,et al.  The CRC concise encyclopedia of mathematics , 1999 .

[11]  A. Savitzky,et al.  Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. , 1964 .

[12]  Valery Godyak,et al.  Probe measurements of electron-energy distributions in plasmas: what can we measure and how can we achieve reliable results? , 2011 .

[13]  M. Hannemann,et al.  Determination of the Electron Energy Distribution Function From Langmuir Probe Characteristics Using Non‐Recursive Digital Filters , 2013 .

[14]  L. Overzet,et al.  Sheath resistance measurements in the GEC reference reactor , 1999 .

[15]  V. Godyak,et al.  Nonequilibrium EEDF in gas discharge plasmas , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.