Release and Absorption Characteristics of Novel Theophylline Sustained-Release Formulations: In Vitro-in Vivo Correlation

Five new experimental sustained-release (SR) formulations of theophylline, T-l, T-l-A, T-2, T-2-A, and T-2-E, in a matrix tablet form with a protein were developed. The in vitro release of theophylline from these novel experimental formulations and two commercial (Theotrim and Theo-Dur) SR formulations, was studied for 2 hr immersed in simulated gastric fluid TS, followed by an additional 10 hr immersed in simulated intestinal fluid TS. Like Theotrim and Theo-Dur, theophylline release profiles from all the novel experimental formulations were smooth, controlled, and unaffected by changes in the pH and the proteolytic enzyme content of the incubation media. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of T-l, T-l-A, T-2-A, Theotrim, and Theo-Dur was carried out in five dogs and six healthy human volunteers under fasting conditions, using immediate-release aminophylline tablets as controls. Pharmacokinetic analysis by the Wagner–Nelson procedure revealed sustained-release absorption characteristics for all the formulations with the exception of the immediate release aminophylline tablet. For each of the formulations tested, the regression analysis results of the percentage of theophylline absorbed in dogs or humans against the mean percentage released in vitro, at the corresponding times, indicated a high correlation. These data imply that the in vivo release profiles under fasting conditions in the gastrointestinal tract of dogs and humans may be similar to those in the in vitro studies.

[1]  José B. Fariña,et al.  Gastro-intestinal bioavailability assessment of commercialy prepared sustained-release lithium tablets using a deconvolution technique , 1989 .

[2]  L. Hollister,et al.  INTER- AND INTRASUBJECT VARIATIONS IN DRUG ABSORPTION KINETICS. , 1964, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[3]  W I Higuchi,et al.  Investigation of factors influencing release of solid drug dispersed in inert matrices. , 1966, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[4]  M. Bialer,et al.  Comparative pharmacokinetic evaluation of sustained-release theophylline formulations in dogs and humans , 1987 .

[5]  Shan-yang Lin,et al.  Moment Analysis for the Evaluation of In Vitro Drug Release and In Vivo Bioavailability of Theophylline Microcapsules , 1988 .

[6]  M Gibaldi,et al.  Establishment of sink conditions in dissolution rate determinations. Theoretical considerations and application to nondisintegrating dosage forms. , 1967, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[7]  L. Block,et al.  Further Considerations in Correlating in Vitro - In Vivo Data Employing Mean-Time Concept Based on Statistical Moments , 1988 .

[8]  P. Maturu,et al.  Influence of a high fat breakfast on the bioavailability of theophylline controlled-release formulations: an in vitro demonstration of an in vivo observation. , 1986, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[9]  C. Shim,et al.  Dissolution of theophylline from sustained-release dosage forms and correlation with saliva bioavailability parameters. , 1987, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[10]  J. Aiache,et al.  New results on an in vitro model for the study of the influence of fatty meals on the bioavailability of theophylline controlled-release formulations. , 1989, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[11]  J. Lindgren,et al.  Correlations betweenin vitro dissolution rate and bioavailability of alaproclate tablets , 1984, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[12]  J. Orcutt,et al.  Micro-scale method for theophylline in body fluids by reversed-phase, high-pressure liquid chromatography. , 1977, Clinical chemistry.