Computed Tomography Image-Based Deep Survival Regression for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Using a Non-proportional Hazards Model

With more than 1,800,000 cases and over 862,000 deaths per year, metastatic colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer related deaths in modern societies. The estimated patient survival is one of the main factors for therapy adjustment. While proportional hazard models are a key instrument for survival analysis within the last centuries, the assumption of hazard proportionality might be overly restrictive and their applicability to complex data remains difficult. Especially the integration of image data comes at the cost of a careful pre-selection of hand-crafted features only. With the rise of deep learning, directly differentiable models for survival analysis have been developed. While some inherit the difficulties of the proportionality assumption, others are restricted to scalar data input. Computed-tomography-based survival analysis remains a hardly researched topic at all. We propose a deep model for computed-tomography-based survival analysis providing a hazard probability output representation comparable to Cox regression without relying on the hazard proportionality assumption. The model is evaluated on multiple datasets, including metastatic colorectal cancer computed tomography imaging data, and significantly reduces the average prediction error compared to the Cox proportional hazards model.

[1]  P. Lambin,et al.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach , 2014, Nature Communications.

[2]  Guangtao Zhai,et al.  A Deep Learning-Based Radiomics Model for Prediction of Survival in Glioblastoma Multiforme , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Michael Morse,et al.  Relationship of circulating tumor cells to tumor response, progression-free survival, and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Changhee Lee,et al.  Dynamic-DeepHit: A Deep Learning Approach for Dynamic Survival Analysis With Competing Risks Based on Longitudinal Data , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Dorit Merhof,et al.  Image-Based Survival Prediction for Lung Cancer Patients Using CNNS , 2018, 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019).

[6]  A. Zauber,et al.  Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  M. Schemper Cox Analysis of Survival Data with Non‐Proportional Hazard Functions , 1992 .

[8]  Leslie H. Sobin,et al.  Comprar TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 7th Edition | C. Wittekind | 9781444332414 | Wiley , 2009 .

[9]  Changhee Lee,et al.  DeepHit: A Deep Learning Approach to Survival Analysis With Competing Risks , 2018, AAAI.

[10]  Rupert G. Miller,et al.  Survival Analysis , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[11]  L. Ries,et al.  Cancer incidence and survival among children and adolescents: United States SEER Program 1975-1995. , 1999 .

[12]  B. Efron Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 1979 .

[13]  Horst-Michael Gross,et al.  Predicting Lesion Growth and Patient Survival in Colorectal Cancer Patients using Deep Neural Networks , 2018 .

[14]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[15]  Hemant Ishwaran,et al.  Random Survival Forests , 2008, Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online.

[16]  Dorit Merhof,et al.  Image-based Survival Analysis for Lung Cancer Patients using CNNs. , 2018 .

[17]  C. Mathers,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[18]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: Overview and Future Promise of an Exciting New Technique , 2016 .