Intermediaries for open innovation: A competence-based comparison of knowledge transfer offices practices

Universities and Public Research Organisation rely on the capabilities and competences of their transfer offices to engage with commercial partners and to manage the exchange of knowledge and expertise. This paper promotes a model that can be used to analyse the capabilities and relative strategies of these transfer offices. Based on a 'core competences' approach the model enables the precise characterisation of the different modes and methods of transfer and engagement. Findings, coming from a two-year, in-depth comparative study of two transfer offices located in France and in the UK, underline the office's relative positioning within their institutional environment and identify the relative priority given to their use of the channels of transfer. These results provide a guide for the strategic management of transfer offices that are now operating within an 'open innovation' paradigm.

[1]  Sanjay K. Jain,et al.  Technology Transfer Offices as Institutional Entrepreneurs: The Case of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2007 .

[2]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Contract Law and the Governance of Inter-Firm Technology Partnerships - An Analysis of Different Modes of Partnering and Their Contractual Implications , 2007 .

[3]  Michèle Paulin,et al.  Contractual governance, relational governance, and the performance of interfirm service exchanges: The influence of boundary-spanner closeness , 2005 .

[4]  Y. Lee,et al.  'TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER' AND THE RESEARCH UNIVERSITY : A SEARCH FOR THE BOUNDARIES OF UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION , 1996 .

[5]  R. Lamming,et al.  Developing innovation capability through learning networks , 2012 .

[6]  D. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction , 1994 .

[7]  Ron Adner,et al.  Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations , 2009 .

[8]  J. Piaget.  The Language and Thought of the Child , 1927 .

[9]  M. Wright,et al.  Research and Technology Commercialization , 2008 .

[10]  David Zilberman,et al.  University Research and Offices of Technology Transfer , 2002 .

[11]  B. Frey,et al.  Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms , 2000 .

[12]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems , 2000 .

[13]  M. Fischer,et al.  Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants , 2002 .

[14]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[15]  Joseph P. Cannon,et al.  Contracts, norms, and plural form governance , 2000 .

[16]  Stephen J. Childe,et al.  Innovation: a knowledge transfer perspective , 2013 .

[17]  P. Olk,et al.  Managing Formation Processes in R&D Consortia , 2005 .

[18]  D. Teece,et al.  Innovation and Cooperation: Implications for Competition and Antitrust , 1990 .

[19]  Josef Windsperger,et al.  The Use of Knowledge Transfer Mechanisms in Franchising , 2010 .

[20]  John Bessant,et al.  Strategic planning in Research and Technology Institutes , 1998 .

[21]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix dynamics, Research Policy (forthcoming). , 2006 .

[22]  U. Lichtenthaler.  Relative capacity: Retaining knowledge outside a firm's boundaries , 2008 .

[23]  M. Wright,et al.  Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications , 2007 .

[24]  David Lei,et al.  Dynamic Core Competences through Meta-Learning and Strategic Context , 1996 .

[25]  Susanne Ollila,et al.  Managing Open Innovation: Exploring Challenges at the Interfaces of an Open Innovation Arena , 2011 .

[26]  L. Leydesdorff.  The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations , 2000 .

[27]  G. Hamel.  Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[28]  Michael Bommer,et al.  Innovation sources of large and small technology-based firms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[29]  Ron Adner.  Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[30]  W. Dugger.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[31]  Chrys Gunasekara,et al.  Reframing the Role of Universities in the Development of Regional Innovation Systems , 2006 .

[32]  R. Rothwell.  Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s , 1992 .

[33]  B. Kogut,et al.  Capabilities as Real Options , 2001 .

[34]  Brian Uzzi,et al.  Relational Embeddedness and Learning: The Case of Bank Loan Managers and Their Clients , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[35]  Jeffrey L. Bradach,et al.  Price, Authority, and Trust: From Ideal Types to Plural Forms , 1989 .

[36]  H. Chesbrough.  Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape , 2006 .

[37]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  Do we really understand tacit knowledge , 2002 .

[38]  M. Clinton,et al.  Using Corporate Universities to Failitate Knowledge Transfer and Achieve Competitive Advantage: An Exploratory Model Based on Media Richness and Type of Knowledge to be Transferred , 2009, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[39]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[40]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links , 2005 .

[41]  Stephen Gourlay.  Conceptualizing Knowledge Creation: A Critique of Nonaka's Theory , 2006 .

[42]  Michael A. Chilton,et al.  The Dimensions of Tacit & Explicit Knowledge: A Description and Measure , 2008, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[43]  R. Veugelers,et al.  Licensing of University Inventions: The Role of a Technology Transfer Office , 2007 .

[44]  E. Huizingh.  Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives , 2011 .

[45]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[46]  Sylvia Scribner,et al.  Knowledge at Work. , 1985 .

[47]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[48]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of triple-helix relations among 'technology, organization, and territory' , 2004, 0911.3414.

[49]  Yan-Ru Li,et al.  The technological roadmap of Cisco's business ecosystem , 2009 .

[50]  B. Kogut.  The network as knowledge : Generative rules and the emergence of structure , 2000 .

[51]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes Social Networks and Economic Outcomes: Core Principles , 2022 .

[52]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[53]  A. Agrawal.  University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions , 2001 .

[54]  J. Howells.  Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation , 2006 .

[55]  A. Link,et al.  Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. , 2004 .

[56]  Peter T. Gianiodis,et al.  Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to market , 2005 .

[57]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[58]  David H. Guston,et al.  Stabilizing the Boundary between US Politics and Science: , 1999, Social studies of science.

[59]  Pak Yoong,et al.  The role of the translator/interpreter in knowledge transfer environments , 2007 .

[60]  G. Krogh,et al.  Managing Knowledge: Perspectives on Cooperation and Competition , 1996 .

[61]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[62]  H. Rush,et al.  Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer , 1995 .

[63]  John W. Bagby,et al.  Knowledge Transfer from Universities to Business: Returns for all Stakeholders? , 2001 .

[64]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[65]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[66]  S. Murray,et al.  Knowledge Type and Communication Media Choice in the Knowledge Transfer Process , 2007 .

[67]  Michael Reinhard,et al.  Wissens- und Technologietransfer in Deutschland - , 2001 .

[68]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review , 2003 .

[69]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[70]  B. Looy,et al.  Toward An Integrative Perspective on Alliance Governance: Connecting Contract Design, Trust Dynamics, and Contract Application , 2008 .

[71]  Kevin Zheng Zhou,et al.  Alternative Origins to Interorganizational Trust: An Interdependence Perspective on the Shadow of the Past and the Shadow of the Future , 2007, Organ. Sci..