Influence of Tools Input/Output Requirements on Managers Core Front End Activities in New Product Development.

The object of analysis of this explorative research is the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation in Product Development, described by those activities going from the opportunity identification to the concept definition. Business scholars have shown that confusion in terms of goals and different ideas about opportunities; make this early phase of the innovation process uncertain and extremely risky. Literature suggests that the understanding, selection and use of appropriate tools/techniques to support decision making are instrumental for a less fuzzy front end of innovation. This paper considers the adoption and use of such tools and the ways that new product development processes can change accordingly. The starting hypothesis that we test here, using 5 case studies in Italy and Denmark, is that managers have to fully understand the needed input requirements and be aware of potential of such tools, in order to experience the expected outcomes downstream. By means of in depth semi-structured interviews, questionnaires and an online survey, we will here investigate the dynamics of tools selection, exploring its effect on the level of difficulty of usage and the potential impact on the efficacy of the new product development process is carried-out. First results show that managers have a low/very low awareness of tools’ inputs/outputs requirements. This gives life to the problem according to which managers cannot select appropriate tools if they do not know their basic characteristics, challenging the opportunity to improve the efficacy of the NPD

[1]  R. Anthony,et al.  Accounting, text and cases , 1989 .

[2]  Horst Geschka,et al.  Introduction and Use of Idea-Generating Methods , 1978 .

[3]  C. Storey,et al.  The Impact of the New Product Development Project on the Success of Financial Services , 1993 .

[4]  Qingyu Zhang,et al.  The fuzzy front end and success of new product development: a causal model , 2001 .

[5]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[6]  John Bessant,et al.  Implementing the new product development process , 1997 .

[7]  Ruud T. Frambach,et al.  Market research companies and new product development tools , 1998 .

[8]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[9]  R. Phelps,et al.  Does scenario planning affect performance? Two exploratory studies , 2001 .

[10]  Paul J. Componation,et al.  Identification of Effective Problem-Solving Tools to Support Continuous Process Improvement Teams , 2000 .

[11]  David Shipley,et al.  Japanese and British Companies Compared: Contributing Factors to Success and Failure in NPD , 1992 .

[12]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[13]  P. O'Connor Implementing a Stage‐Gate Process: A Multi‐Company Perspective , 1994 .

[14]  David Wilemon,et al.  Focusing the Fuzzy Front-End in New Product Development , 2002 .

[15]  Rosa Oppenheim,et al.  Winning at New Products , 1990 .

[16]  Yan Shen Xu,et al.  The Objectives Decision Making Study in Product Innovation Development Process Based on TRIZ Technology Evolution Theory , 2004 .

[17]  R. Brown,et al.  Managing the “S” curves of innovation , 1992 .

[18]  Muammer Ozer,et al.  Reducing the demand uncertainties at the fuzzy-front-end of developing new online services , 2007 .

[19]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Group-based ER-AHP system for product project screening , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  T. Davenport,et al.  Toward an innovation sourcing strategy , 2003 .

[21]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Chapter 5 – Creativity in new product development: An evolutionary integration , 2007 .

[22]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing product development , 1992 .

[23]  P. Ahmed,et al.  From product innovation to solutions innovation: a new paradigm for competitive advantage , 2000 .

[24]  C. Storey,et al.  The Impact of the New Product Development Project on the Success of Financial Services , 1993 .

[25]  Pasi Valkokari,et al.  Elucidating the fuzzy front end: Experiences from the INNORISK project , 2010 .

[26]  S. Hart,et al.  Where to Now in New Product Development Research , 1992 .

[27]  Edwin J. Nijssen,et al.  Awareness, use and effectiveness of models and methods for new product development , 1995 .

[28]  J. Rossiter,et al.  New “Brainstorming” Principles , 1994 .

[29]  Yan Xin,et al.  The Application of New Product Development Tools in Industry: The Case of Singapore , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[30]  Francisco Javier Miranda González,et al.  The effect of new product development techniques on new product success in Spanish firms , 2002 .

[31]  Michel Godet,et al.  The Art of Scenarios and Strategic Planning - Tools and Pitfalls , 2000 .

[32]  Melissa A. Schilling Technological Lockout: An Integrative Model of the Economic and Strategic Factors Driving Technology Success and Failure , 1998 .

[33]  Ruud T. Frambach,et al.  Determinants of the adoption of new product development tools by industrial firms , 2000 .

[34]  Michael E. McGrath,et al.  Chapter 2 – PACE: An Integrated Process for Product And Cycle-time Excellence , 1996 .

[35]  Jeffrey B. Schmidt New product myopia , 1995 .

[36]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  An Integrative Framework for Strategy-Making Processes , 1992 .

[37]  Yan Xin,et al.  An exploratory study of the use of quality tools and techniques in product development , 2005 .

[38]  Antonie J. Jetter,et al.  Educating the guess: strategies, concepts and tools for the fuzzy front end of product development , 2003, PICMET '03: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology Technology Management for Reshaping the World, 2003..

[39]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Design and marketing of new products , 1980 .

[40]  P. Schoemaker MULTIPLE SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT: ITS CONCEPTUAL AND BEHAVIORAL FOUNDATION , 1993 .

[41]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  The use of creative stimuli at early stages of industrial product innovation , 2010 .

[42]  Joaquín Alegre,et al.  A measurement scale for product innovation performance , 2006 .

[43]  Sabine Brunswicker,et al.  CROSSING HORIZONS: LEVERAGING CROSS-INDUSTRY INNOVATION SEARCH IN THE FRONT-END OF THE INNOVATION PROCESS , 2010 .

[44]  Maree Conway Scenario planning: an innovative approach to strategy development , 2004 .

[45]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Managing the new product development process: Strategic imperatives , 1998 .

[46]  Eric Bonabeau,et al.  A more rational approach to new-product development. , 2008, Harvard business review.

[47]  P. Schoemaker Scenario Planning: A Tool for Strategic Thinking , 1995 .

[48]  M. Lewis Success, failure and organisational competence:a case study of the new product development process , 2001 .

[49]  Harvey Maylor,et al.  Assessing the relationship between practice changes and process improvement in new product development , 2001 .

[50]  S. Isaksen,et al.  A Reexamination of Brainstorming Research: Implications for Research and Practice , 2005 .

[51]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[52]  Antonella Martini,et al.  Tools and abilities for continuous improvement: what are the drivers of performance? , 2007, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[53]  P. Trott Innovation Management And New Product Development , 2004 .

[54]  John Preston,et al.  Winning at New Products , 1988 .

[55]  Chiu-Chi Wei,et al.  A Model for Selecting Product Ideas in Fuzzy Front End , 2008, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[56]  Peter A. Koen,et al.  The Fuzzy Front End for Incremental, Platform, and Breakthrough Products , 2007 .

[57]  William R. Huss,et al.  A move toward scenario analysis , 1988 .

[58]  Thomas J. Chermack,et al.  Studying scenario planning: Theory, research suggestions, and hypotheses , 2005 .

[59]  Kulwant S. Pawar,et al.  Performance evaluation of new product development from a company perspective , 2001 .