Mammographic features and correlation with biopsy findings using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVABB).

BACKGROUND Mammograms are assigned a BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) category, which indicates the level of suspicion for cancer. OBJECTIVES (i) To evaluate the use of BI-RADS categories in a non-academic radiology practice based in a community hospital compared with local radiology private offices; (ii) to determine positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity and specificity of mammograms; and (iii) to explore the correlation of BI-RAD 3-5 and lesion description with diagnosis of cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed 947 SVABBs (stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies) on 911 patients with BI-RADS 3-5. Lesions were classified as: 1=microcalcifications; 2=asymmetric density; 3=circumscribed mass; and 4=spiculated mass. RESULTS BI-RADS category correlated with diagnosis of breast cancer (atypia excluded): category 3=4%; category 4=15%; and category 5=79%. The PPV of BI-RADS 4 and 5 for breast cancer or atypia was 20%, in contrast to 5% for BI-RADS 3. Sensitivity and specificity were 95% and 19%, respectively. For BI-RADS 3 without microcalcifications only 3% were positive, in contrast to 8% for remainder. CONCLUSIONS First, there is a stepwise increase in cancer for each of the BI-RADS categories 3-5. Secondly, in BI-RADS 3 with microcalcifications, a biopsy is indicated according to our findings. Finally, the sensitivity of mammograms is 95% but the specificity is 19%.

[1]  H. Kölbl,et al.  Evaluation of mammographic and clinical follow-up after 755 stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies. , 2003, American journal of surgery.

[2]  A Isnard,et al.  [Stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: experience with 249 patients]. , 2002, Journal de radiologie.

[3]  L. Liberman,et al.  Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[4]  U. Fischer,et al.  Stereotaktische Vakuumstanzbiopsie zur Abklärung von gruppiertem Mikrokalk der Kategorie BI-RADSTM 3 , 2001 .

[5]  G V Page,et al.  Stereotactic breast biopsy: a six-year surgical experience. , 2001, The Journal of the Kentucky Medical Association.

[6]  J. Leung,et al.  Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: 5 years' experience in a community hospital. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  S. Obenauer,et al.  [Stereotactic vacuum core biopsy of clustered microcalcifications classified as B1-RADS 3]. , 2001, RöFo. Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren (Print).

[8]  P. Ugolini,et al.  Level of suspicion of a mammographic lesion: use of features defined by BI-RADS lexicon and correlation with large-core breast biopsy. , 1998, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[9]  L. Liberman,et al.  The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Physician qualifications for stereotactic breast biopsy: a revised statement. American College of Surgeons and American College of Radiology. , 1998, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.

[11]  X. Varas,et al.  Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[12]  J C de Waal Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions. , 1991, Radiology.