The integration of parallel and serial processing mechanisms in visual search: evidence from eye movement recording

We examined timing and scanning paths of eye movements during a visual search task, in which subjects had to detect, as quickly as possible, the presence or absence of a target among distractors [Q-like element among O stimuli (QvsO) and viceversa (OvsQ)]. According to an influential theory [Treisman, A. & Gelade, G. (1980) Cognitive Psychol, 12, 97‐136; Treisman, A. & Sato, S. (1990) J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 16, 459‐478], only tasks yielding nonflat search functions (OvsQ) involve focal attention. Alternative models propose that all kinds of visual search are resolved by a biased competitive process, working in parallel across the visual field. Data show that QvsO and OvsQ tasks are characterized by quantitative rather than by qualitative differences in search strategy. No differences between the two tasks were found regarding either the percentage of saccades foveating single stimulus items or the timing of the button response with respect to the onset of the last foveation saccade within a trial. Furthermore, the number of saccades made during search predicted very accurately the time required to accomplish the task and fixation times were independent of the number of stimulus items. On the basis of our results there is no reason to postulate the occurrence of shifts of visuospatial attention, other than those associated with the executions of saccadic eye movements, which are driven by a parallel feature analysis of the visual scene, in both types of search tasks. A time-limited competitive model for attentive target identification, in which both parallel (competitive) and serial (attentive) processing mechanisms are integrated, can account for these findings, providing a unified conceptual framework for all kinds of visual search.

[1]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited , 1990 .

[2]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision , 1994, Nature.

[3]  G. Zelinsky.  Using Eye Saccades to Assess the Selectivity of Search Movements , 1996, Vision Research.

[4]  J. Findlay,et al.  The Relationship between Eye Movements and Spatial Attention , 1986, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[5]  B. C. Motter,et al.  The guidance of eye movements during active visual search , 1998, Vision Research.

[6]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[8]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[9]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A PET study of visuospatial attention , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  J. Beck.  Similarity Grouping of Curves , 1973, Perceptual and motor skills.

[12]  G. Zelinsky,et al.  Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search. , 1997 .

[13]  J. Findlay.  Saccade Target Selection During Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[14]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[16]  R. Wurtz,et al.  The Neurobiology of Saccadic Eye Movements , 1989 .

[17]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  H. Freund,et al.  Magneto-encephalographic correlates of the lateralized readiness potential. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[19]  Iain D Gilchrist,et al.  Saccade selection in visual search: evidence for spatial frequency specific between-item interactions , 1999, Vision Research.

[20]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models, 2nd Edn. , 1990 .

[21]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A Common Network of Functional Areas for Attention and Eye Movements , 1998, Neuron.

[22]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Superior Parietal Cortex Activation During Spatial Attention Shifts and Visual Feature Conjunction , 1995, Science.

[24]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  M. Cheal,et al.  Attention in visual search: Multiple search classes , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  J. Henderson.  Visual Attention and Eye Movement Control During Reading and Picture Viewing , 1992 .

[27]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  S. Liversedge,et al.  Saccadic eye movements and cognition , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  J. Duncan,et al.  Competitive brain activity in visual attention , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[30]  R. Desimone,et al.  Responses of Neurons in Inferior Temporal Cortex during Memory- Guided Visual Search , 1998 .

[31]  B. C. Motter,et al.  The zone of focal attention during active visual search , 1998, Vision Research.

[32]  John Duncan,et al.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex , 1993, Nature.

[33]  B. Dosher,et al.  The role of attention in the programming of saccades , 1995, Vision Research.