An Adaptive Modular Recurrent Cerebellum-Inspired Controller

Animals and robots face the common challenge of interacting with an unstructured environment. While animals excel and thrive in such environments, modern robotics struggles to effectively execute simple tasks. To help improve performance in the face of frequent changes in the mapping between action and outcome (change in context) we propose the Modular-RDC controller, a bio-inspired controller based on the Recurrent Decorrelation Control (RDC) architecture. The proposed controller consists of multiple modules, each containing a forward and inverse model pair. The combined output of all inverse models is used to control the plant, with the contribution of each inverse model determined by a responsibility factor. The controller is able to correctly identify the best module for the current context, enabling a significant reduction of 70.9% in control error for a context-switching plant. It is also shown that the controller results in a degree of generalization in control.

[1]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Internal models in the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  A G Pipe,et al.  An adaptive gaze stabilization controller inspired by the vestibulo-ocular reflex , 2008, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[3]  D M Wolpert,et al.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control , 1998, Neural Networks.

[4]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  MOSAIC Model for Sensorimotor Learning and Control , 2001, Neural Computation.

[5]  M. Kawato,et al.  Modular organization of internal models of tools in the human cerebellum , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  James V. Stone,et al.  Recurrent cerebellar architecture solves the motor-error problem , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  M. Fujita,et al.  Adaptive filter model of the cerebellum , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[8]  Sean R. Anderson,et al.  Bioinspired Adaptive Control for Artificial Muscles , 2013, Living Machines.

[9]  Masao Ito,et al.  Historical Review of the Significance of the Cerebellum and the Role of Purkinje Cells in Motor Learning , 2002, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Kumpati S. Narendra,et al.  Improving transient response of adaptive control systems using multiple models and switching , 1994 .

[11]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[12]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Internal models underlying grasp can be additively combined , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Sean R. Anderson,et al.  Cerebellar-Inspired Adaptive Control of a Robot Eye Actuated by Pneumatic Artificial Muscles , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).