The Four-Component Instructional Design Model : Multimedia Principles in Environments for Complex Learning

This introductory chapter provides a definition of multimedia learning, offers a rationale for multimedia learning, outlines the research base for multimedia learning, summarizes changes since the first edition, and draws distinctions between the two approaches to multimedia design, three metaphors of multimedia learning, three kinds of multimedia learning outcomes, and two kinds of active learning. Multimedia represents a potentially powerful learning technology that is, a system for enhancing human learning. A practical goal of research on multimedia is to devise design principles for multimedia presentations. In addressing this goal, it is useful to distinguish between two approaches to multimedia design a technology-centered approach and a learner-centered approach. Response, strengthening, information acquisition, and knowledge construction are three metaphors of multimedia learning. Research on learning shows that meaningful learning depends on the learner's cognitive activity during learning rather than on the learner's behavioral activity during learning.

[1]  Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer,et al.  Strategies for Programming Instruction in High School: Program Completion vs. Program Generation , 1990 .

[2]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Affective impact of navigational and signaling aids to e-learning , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  R. Mayer,et al.  When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? , 2001 .

[4]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[5]  T. Gog,et al.  Learning to see: Guiding students' attention via a Model's eye movements fosters learning , 2013 .

[6]  R. Glavin,et al.  Low‐ to high‐fidelity simulation – a continuum of medical education? , 2003, Medical education.

[7]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .

[8]  Liesbeth Kester,et al.  Learner-controlled selection of tasks with different surface and structural features: Effects on transfer and efficiency , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Can differences in learning strategies explain the benefits of learning from static and dynamic visualizations? , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[10]  Tristan E. Johnson,et al.  Individual and team annotation effects on students' reading comprehension, critical thinking, and meta-cognitive skills , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  Richard A. Carlson,et al.  Component Practice and Exposure to a Problem-Solving Context , 1990 .

[12]  Henk G. Schmidt,et al.  Effects of mobilizing prior knowledge on information processing: Studies of free recall and allocation of study time , 1993 .

[13]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity , 1999 .

[14]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Incorporating Learner Experience into the Design of Multimedia Instruction. , 2000 .

[15]  Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer,et al.  Implementing Instructional Models in Computer-Based Learning Environments: A Case Study in Problem Selection , 1996 .

[16]  Detlev Leutner Double-fading support - a training approach to complex software systems , 2000, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[17]  Florian Schmidt-Weigand,et al.  A closer look at split visual attention in system- and self-paced instruction in multimedia learning , 2010 .

[18]  Wolfgang Schnotz,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: An Integrated Model of Text and Picture Comprehension , 2005 .

[19]  M. David Merrill,et al.  First principles of instruction , 2012 .

[20]  R. Mayer,et al.  For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. , 1994 .

[21]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Relative effectiveness of animated and static diagrams: An effect of learner prior knowledge , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Signaling as a Cognitive Guide in Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[23]  H. Tabbers,et al.  The modality of text in multimedia instructions:Refining the design guidelines. , 2002 .

[24]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Component Fluency in a Problem-Solving Context , 1989 .

[25]  Liesbeth Kester,et al.  The management of cognitive load during complex cognitive skill acquisition by means of computer-simulated problem solving. , 2005, The British journal of educational psychology.

[26]  Henk G. Schmidt,et al.  Effects of problem-based discussion on studying a subsequent text: A randomized trial among first year medical students , 2001 .

[27]  Fred Paas,et al.  A comparison of approaches to learning task selection in the training of complex cognitive skills , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  The worked-example effect: Not an artefact of lousy control conditions , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  R. Mayer,et al.  A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. , 2000 .

[30]  Jean-Michel Boucheix,et al.  Cueing animations: Dynamic signaling aids information extraction and comprehension , 2013 .

[31]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  Novel constructivist learning environments and novel technologies: some issues to be concerned with , 1998 .

[32]  F. Paas,et al.  Differential effects of problem-solving demands on individual and collaborative learning outcomes. , 2011 .

[33]  T. Gog,et al.  The Effects of Practice Schedule and Critical Thinking Prompts on Learning and Transfer of a Complex Judgment Task. , 2011 .

[34]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Using segmentation to support the learning from animated soccer scenes: An effect of prior knowledge , 2013 .

[35]  Tamara van Gog,et al.  Explaining the segmentation effect in learning from animations: The role of pausing and temporal cueing , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[36]  T. Gog,et al.  The effects of practice schedule on learning a complex judgment task , 2011 .

[37]  John Sweller,et al.  The impact of sequencing and prior knowledge on learning mathematics through spreadsheet applications , 2005 .

[38]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[39]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  The influence of text modality on learning with static and dynamic visualizations , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  R. Moreno,et al.  Cognitive load and learning effects of having students organize pictures and words in multimedia environments: The role of student interactivity and feedback , 2005 .

[41]  T. Gog,et al.  In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli , 2010 .

[42]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  The effects of realism in learning with dynamic visualizations , 2009 .

[43]  Cornelia S. Große,et al.  How Fading Worked Solution Steps Works – A Cognitive Load Perspective , 2004 .

[44]  John Sweller,et al.  Improving Listening Skills in English as a Foreign Language by Reading Rather than Listening: A Cognitive Load Perspective , 2012 .

[45]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .

[46]  Ernest T. Goetz,et al.  Reading in Perspective: What Real Cops and Pretend Burglars Look for in a Story. Technical Report No. 266. , 1982 .

[47]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Induction: Processes Of Inference , 1989 .

[48]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Effectiveness of on-screen pinyin in learning Chinese: An expertise reversal for multimedia redundancy effect , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[49]  H. Tabbers,et al.  Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: effects of modality and cueing. , 2004, The British journal of educational psychology.

[50]  Jan L. Plass,et al.  Design factors for educationally effective animations and simulations , 2009, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[51]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction , 1999 .

[52]  Theo J. Bastiaens,et al.  The surplus value of an authentic learning environment , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[53]  S. Ainsworth,et al.  Multiple Forms of Dynamic Representation. , 2004 .

[54]  P. Chandler,et al.  THE SPLIT‐ATTENTION EFFECT AS A FACTOR IN THE DESIGN OF INSTRUCTION , 1992 .

[55]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  The Expertise Reversal Effect , 2003 .

[56]  Matthias Nückles,et al.  Differently structured advance organizers lead to different initial schemata and learning outcomes , 2012 .

[57]  Liesbeth Kester,et al.  Timing of Information Presentation in Learning Statistics , 2004 .

[58]  Ulrik Schroeder,et al.  Animated demonstrations and training wheels interfaces in a complex learning environment , 2008, Interact. Comput..

[59]  F. Paas,et al.  Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach , 1994 .

[60]  Cheryl I. Johnson,et al.  An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[61]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. , 2001 .

[62]  Fred Paas,et al.  High versus low contextual interference in simulation-based training of troubleshooting skills: effects on transfer performance and invested mental effort , 1998 .

[63]  Maria Limniou,et al.  Online general pre-laboratory training course for facilitating first year chemical laboratory use , 2010 .

[64]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model , 2002 .

[65]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[66]  Richard E Mayer,et al.  Fostering understanding of multimedia messages through pre-training: evidence for a two-stage theory of mental model construction. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[67]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Memory characteristics and modality in multimedia learning: An aptitude–treatment–interaction study , 2009 .

[68]  R. Mayer,et al.  How Seductive Details Do Their Damage: A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning , 1998 .

[69]  Thomas T. Liao,et al.  Advanced educational technology : research issues and future potential , 1996 .

[70]  Martin Valcke,et al.  Multimedia learning in social sciences: limitations of external graphical representations , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[71]  T. Jong,et al.  Comparing two types of model progression in an inquiry learning environment with modelling facilities , 2011 .

[72]  Susan M. Fulgham The effects of varying levels of support through worked examples on achievement in software application training , 2008 .

[73]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  Designing Instructional Examples to Reduce Intrinsic Cognitive Load: Molar versus Modular Presentation of Solution Procedures , 2004 .

[74]  Fred Paas,et al.  Process-Oriented Worked Examples: Improving Transfer Performance Through Enhanced Understanding , 2004 .

[75]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Ten steps to complex learning (2nd ed.) , 2012 .

[76]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[77]  Kirsten Berthold,et al.  The expertise reversal effect in prompting focused processing of instructional explanations , 2013 .

[78]  P. Chandler,et al.  Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn , 1994 .

[79]  Jan Streumer,et al.  Working and Learning with Electronic Performance Support Systems: An Effectiveness Study , 1997 .

[80]  Sandra Wetzels,et al.  Individualised strategies for prior knowledge activation , 2009 .

[81]  Maria Bannert,et al.  The effects of training wheels and self-learning materials in software training , 2008, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[82]  Cheryl I. Johnson,et al.  Applying the self-explanation principle to multimedia learning in a computer-based game-like environment , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[83]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[84]  R. Mayer,et al.  Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening , 2002 .

[85]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load While Learning to Use a Computer Program , 1996 .

[86]  A. Paivio,et al.  Dual coding theory and education , 1991 .

[87]  Ramsey Musallam,et al.  The effects of using screencasting as a multimedia pre-training tool to manage the intrinsic cognitive load of chemical equilibrium instruction for advanced high school chemistry students , 2010 .

[88]  S. Barab,et al.  Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning sciences , 2006 .

[89]  P. Chandler,et al.  When auditory presentations should and should not be a component of multimedia instruction , 2003 .

[90]  N. Cowan Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework , 1995 .

[91]  Fred Paas,et al.  Mental Effort and Performance as Determinants for the Dynamic Selection of Learning Tasks in Air Traffic Control Training , 2004 .

[92]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Attention guidance during example study via the model's eye movements , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[93]  R. Atkinson,et al.  Structuring the Transition From Example Study to Problem Solving in Cognitive Skill Acquisition: A Cognitive Load Perspective , 2003 .

[94]  Alexander Renkl,et al.  Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations , 2009 .

[95]  Azar Pakdaman Savoji,et al.  Cognitive consequences of segmentation and modality methods in learning from instructional animations , 2011 .

[96]  Liesbeth Kester,et al.  Combining shared control with variability over surface features: Effects on transfer test performance and task involvement , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[97]  C. Penney Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[98]  Liesbeth Kester,et al.  Towards a personalized task selection model with shared instructional control , 2006 .

[99]  Dominique Sluijsmans,et al.  Toward a Synthesis of Cognitive Load Theory, Four-Component Instructional Design, and Self-Directed Learning , 2009 .

[100]  Jan Elen,et al.  Understanding and Enhancing the Use of Multiple External Representations in Chemistry Education , 2012 .

[101]  Jacqueline Bourdeau,et al.  Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2010 .

[102]  Robert J. Dufresne,et al.  Constraining Novices to Perform Expertlike Problem Analyses: Effects on Schema Acquisition , 1992 .

[103]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  Optimal self-explanation prompt design in dynamic multi-representational learning environments , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[104]  J. G. Schuurman,et al.  Redirecting learners' attention during training: Effects on cognitive load, transfer test performance and training efficiency. , 2002 .

[105]  Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer,et al.  The modality effect in multimedia instructions , 2001 .

[106]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. , 2001 .

[107]  John H. Holland,et al.  Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[108]  Peter Gerjets,et al.  How temporal and spatial aspects of presenting visualizations affect learning about locomotion patterns , 2012 .

[109]  Paul Ayres Impact of Reducing Intrinsic Cognitive Load on Learning in a Mathematical Domain. , 2006 .

[110]  Wolfgang Schnotz,et al.  Enabling, facilitating, and inhibiting effects of animations in multimedia learning: Why reduction of cognitive load can have negative results on learning , 2005 .

[111]  M. David Merrill,et al.  Integrative goals for instructional design , 1990 .

[112]  Tzu-Chien Liu,et al.  Split-attention and redundancy effects on mobile learning in physical environments , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[113]  Günter Daniel Rey A Review of Research and a Meta-Analysis of the Seductive Detail Effect. , 2012 .

[114]  P. Chandler,et al.  The Role of Visual Indicators in Dual Sensory Mode Instruction , 1997 .

[115]  Ruth N. Schwartz,et al.  Effects of pacing and cognitive style across dynamic and non-dynamic representations , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[116]  A. Baddeley Human Memory: Theory and Practice, Revised Edition , 1990 .

[117]  P. Kirschner,et al.  Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning , 2003 .

[118]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulated learning and academic achievement : theoretical perspectives , 2001 .

[119]  J. Tuovinen,et al.  A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples , 1999 .

[120]  Henk G. Schmidt,et al.  The effect of prior knowledge activation on text recall: an investigation of two conflicting hypotheses , 1995 .

[121]  P. Chandler,et al.  Assimilating complex information , 2002 .

[122]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[123]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Rules of the Mind , 1993 .

[124]  Wolfgang Schnotz,et al.  Interactive and Non-Interactive Pictures in Multimedia Learning Environments: Effects on Learning Outcomes and Learning Efficiency , 2009 .

[125]  Karsten Stegmann,et al.  Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not) , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[126]  Alexander Renkl,et al.  Are high-coherent concept maps better for prior knowledge activation? Differential effects of concept mapping tasks on high school vs. university students , 2008, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[127]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Rapid dynamic assessment of expertise to improve the efficiency of adaptive e-learning , 2005 .

[128]  R. Gagne Conditions of Learning , 1965 .

[129]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Information presentation and troubleshooting in electrical circuits , 2004 .

[130]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory , 2020, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[131]  K. VanLehn,et al.  Testing the instructional fit hypothesis: the case of self-explanation prompts , 2011 .

[132]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent , 2003 .

[133]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Examining learning from text and pictures for different task types: Does the multimedia effect differ for conceptual, causal, and procedural tasks? , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[134]  J. Merriënboer,et al.  Design and evaluation of a development portfolio: how to improve students’ self-directed learning skills , 2009 .

[135]  Sanghoon Park,et al.  Problem format and presentation sequence: effects on learning and mental effort among US high school students , 2006 .

[136]  Florian Schimpf,et al.  Reducing the graphical user interface of a dynamic geometry system , 2011 .

[137]  Bram Pynoo,et al.  Optimizing Physicians’ Instruction of PACS Through E-Learning: Cognitive Load Theory Applied , 2007, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[138]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Learning by self-explaining causal diagrams in high-school biology , 2012 .

[139]  Rob Nadolski,et al.  A model for optimizing step size of learning tasks in competency-based multimedia practicals , 2001 .

[140]  Sharon K Tindall-Ford,et al.  When two sensory modes are better than one , 1997 .

[141]  Alexander Renkl,et al.  How Can We Use Concept Maps for Prior Knowledge Activation - Different Mapping-tasks Lead to Different Cognitive Processes , 2006, ICLS.

[142]  Paul Chandler,et al.  Some Conditions under Which Integrated Computer-Based Training Software Can Facilitate Learning , 1996 .

[143]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[144]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions , 2000 .

[145]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2001 .

[146]  Cheryl I. Johnson,et al.  Revising the Redundancy Principle in Multimedia Learning. , 2008 .

[147]  J. Merriënboer,et al.  Selecting learning tasks: Effects of adaptation and shared control on learning efficiency and task involvement☆ , 2008 .

[148]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Effects of the reader's schema at different points in time , 1979 .

[149]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Making use: scenarios and scenario-based design , 2000, DIS '00.

[150]  J. Sweller Instructional Design Consequences of an Analogy between Evolution by Natural Selection and Human Cognitive Architecture , 2004 .

[151]  Paul Ginns Meta-Analysis of the Modality Effect. , 2005 .

[152]  R. Mayer,et al.  The instructive animation: helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning , 1992 .

[153]  Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer,et al.  Paradoxical effects of information presentation formats and contextual interference on transfer of a complex cognitive skill , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[154]  Tamara van Gog,et al.  An expertise reversal effect of segmentation in learning from animated worked-out examples , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[155]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Effectiveness of Part-Task Training and Increasing-Difficulty Training Strategies , 2013, Hum. Factors.

[156]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Mechanisms that facilitate the effectiveness of elaboration strategies. , 1997 .

[157]  Otto Jelsma,et al.  Training for reflective expertise: A four-component instructional design model for complex cognitive skills , 1992 .

[158]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Guided self-management of transient information in animations through pacing and sequencing strategies , 2013 .

[159]  J. Leppink,et al.  Self-explanation in the domain of statistics: an expertise reversal effect , 2012 .

[160]  A. Renkl Learning mathematics from worked-out examples: Analyzing and fostering self-explanations , 1999 .

[161]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Explanatory Models in the Processing of Science Text: The Role of Prior Knowledge Activation Through Small-Group Discussion , 1989 .

[162]  R. Atkinson,et al.  Transitioning From Studying Examples to Solving Problems: Effects of Self-Explanation Prompts and Fading Worked-Out Steps. , 2003 .

[163]  J. Merriënboer,et al.  The effects of portfolio-based advice on the development of self-directed learning skills in secondary vocational education , 2009 .

[164]  Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer,et al.  Strategies for computer-based programming instruction: Program completion vs. program generation. , 1992 .

[165]  R. Mayer,et al.  Animations need narrations : an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis , 1991 .

[166]  Paul Ginns Integrating information: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects , 2006 .

[167]  R. Mayer,et al.  Maximizing Constructivist Learning From Multimedia Communications by Minimizing Cognitive Load , 1999 .

[168]  D. Perkins,et al.  Are Cognitive Skills Context-Bound? , 1989 .

[169]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[170]  Jill L. Quilici,et al.  Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems. , 1996 .

[171]  Fred Paas,et al.  Dynamic problem selection in air traffic control training: a comparison between performance, mental effort and mental efficiency , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[172]  Fred Paas,et al.  Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[173]  S. Derry,et al.  Learning from Examples: Instructional Principles from the Worked Examples Research , 2000 .