Skills Learning in Robot-Assisted Surgery Is Benefited by Task-Specific Augmented Feedback

Background: Providing augmented visual feedback is one way to enhance robot-assisted surgery (RAS) training. However, it is unclear whether task specificity should be considered when applying augmented visual feedback. Methods: Twenty-two novice users of the da Vinci Surgical System underwent testing and training in 3 tasks: simple task, bimanual carrying (BC); intermediate task, needle passing (NP); and complex task, suture tying (ST). Pretraining (PRE), training, and posttraining (POST) trials were performed during the first session. Retention trials were performed 2 weeks later (RET). Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 feedback training groups: relative phase (RP), speed, grip force, and video feedback groups. Performance measures were time to task completion (TTC), total distance traveled (D), speed (S), curvature, relative phase, and grip force (F). Results: Significant interaction for TTC and curvature showed that the RP feedback training improved temporal measures of complex ST task compared to simple BC task. Speed feedback training significantly improved the performance in simple BC task in terms of TTC, D, S, curvature, and F even after retention. There was also a lesser long-term effect of speed feedback training on complex ST task. Grip force feedback training resulted in significantly greater improvements in TTC and curvature for complex ST task. For the video feedback training group, the improvements in most of the outcome measures were evident only after RET. Conclusions: Task-specific augmented feedback is beneficial to RAS skills learning. Particularly, the RP and grip force feedback could be useful for training complex tasks.

[1]  D. Yuh,et al.  Effects of visual force feedback on robot-assisted surgical task performance. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  A. Darzi,et al.  Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[3]  Dmitry Oleynikov,et al.  Electromyographic response is altered during robotic surgical training with augmented feedback. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Dmitry Oleynikov,et al.  Real-time augmented feedback benefits robotic laparoscopic training. , 2006, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[5]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  W. Prinz,et al.  Compatibility between Observed and Executed Finger Movements: Comparing Symbolic, Spatial, and Imitative Cues , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[7]  J Rosen,et al.  Objective laparoscopic skills assessments of surgical residents using Hidden Markov Models based on haptic information and tool/tissue interactions. , 2001, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[8]  Dmitry Oleynikov,et al.  Enhanced Robotic Surgical Training Using Augmented Visual Feedback , 2008, Surgical innovation.

[9]  J Rosen,et al.  Surgeon-tool force/torque signatures--evaluation of surgical skills in minimally invasive surgery. , 1999, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[10]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Motor learning with augmented feedback: modality-dependent behavioral and neural consequences. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  A. Darzi,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[12]  Garth H Ballantyne,et al.  The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. , 2003, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[13]  Banty Tia,et al.  Improvement of motor performance by observational training in elderly people , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[14]  T. Hernandez-Boussard,et al.  A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices. , 2010, Surgery.

[15]  D Oleynikov,et al.  Robotic surgery training and performance: identifying objective variables for quantifying the extent of proficiency. , 2006, Surgical endoscopy.

[16]  Dmitry Oleynikov,et al.  Effect of visual feedback on surgical performance using the da Vinci surgical system. , 2006, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[17]  C. Shea,et al.  Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors , 2010, Medical education.

[18]  D. Bavelier,et al.  Exercising your brain: a review of human brain plasticity and training-induced learning. , 2008, Psychology and aging.

[19]  Gabriel Baud-Bovy,et al.  Delayed visual feedback affects both manual tracking and grip force control when transporting a handheld object. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  M. Gagner,et al.  Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[21]  J. Adams,et al.  A closed-loop theory of motor learning. , 1971, Journal of motor behavior.