Factoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection

Conservation organizations must redouble efforts to protect habitat given continuing biodiversity declines. Prioritization of future areas for protection is hampered by disagreements over what the ecological targets of conservation should be. Here we test the claim that such disagreements will become less important as conservation moves away from prioritizing areas for protection based only on ecological considerations and accounts for varying costs of protection using return-on-investment (ROI) methods. We combine a simulation approach with a case study of forests in the eastern United States, paying particular attention to how covariation between ecological benefits and economic costs influences agreement levels. For many conservation goals, agreement over spatial priorities improves with ROI methods. However, we also show that a reliance on ROI-based prioritization can sometimes exacerbate disagreements over priorities. As such, accounting for costs in conservation planning does not enable society to sidestep careful consideration of the ecological goals of conservation.Prioritising areas for conservation is hindered by disagreements over ecological targets. Here, Armsworth et al. combine a simulation approach and case study to test if considering economic return on investment aids in prioritisation, and find that its impact on reaching agreements varies greatly.

[1]  Joanna B. Whittier,et al.  Defining conservation priorities for freshwater fishes according to taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity , 2011 .

[2]  H. Pereira,et al.  Conservation Planning for Biodiversity and Wilderness: A Real-World Example , 2015, Environmental Management.

[3]  D. Roush.  Making collaboration work : lessons from innovation in natural resource management , 2002 .

[4]  K. Gaston,et al.  The Size, Concentration and Growth of Biodiversity-Conservation Nonprofits , 2012 .

[5]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Conserving biodiversity coldspots: recent calls to direct conservation funding to the world's biodiversity hotspots may be bad investment advice. , 2003 .

[6]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Tradeoffs of different types of species occurrence data for use in systematic conservation planning. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[7]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Changing spatial patterns of conservation investment by a major land trust , 2013 .

[8]  M. Koopman,et al.  The Potential for Double-Loop Learning to Enable Landscape Conservation Efforts , 2014, Environmental Management.

[9]  J. D. Larson.  Hydrogeology of the observation well site at the United States Geological Survey National Center, Reston, Virginia , 1978 .

[10]  R. Maloney,et al.  Financial Costs of Meeting Global Biodiversity Conservation Targets: Current Spending and Unmet Needs , 2012, Science.

[11]  B. Marcot,et al.  Characterizing species at risk. II: Using Bayesian belief networks as decision support tools to determine species conservation categories under the Northwest Forest Plan. , 2006 .

[12]  Lisette Cantú-Salazar,et al.  Management costs for small protected areas and economies of scale in habitat conservation , 2011 .

[13]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Constraints of philanthropy on determining the distribution of biodiversity conservation funding , 2016, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[14]  C. Rittenhouse,et al.  Conservation planning: informed decisions for a healthier planet , 2017, Landscape Ecology.

[15]  H. Possingham,et al.  Factoring attitudes towards armed conflict risk into selection of protected areas for conservation , 2016, Nature Communications.

[16]  H. P. Possingham,et al.  The effectiveness of marine reserve systems constructed using different surrogates of biodiversity , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[17]  Alex James,et al.  Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needs , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  S. Polasky,et al.  Setting the bar: Standards for ecosystem services , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  James B. Lockhart,et al.  Federal Housing Finance Agency , 2020, Federal Regulatory Guide.

[20]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Informed actions: where to cost effectively manage multiple threats to species to maximize return on investment. , 2014, Ecological Applications.

[21]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Targeting global conservation funding to limit immediate biodiversity declines , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  A.R,et al.  Classics in physical geography revisited , 2003 .

[23]  Liana N. Joseph,et al.  Evaluating Trade‐Offs between Target Persistence Levels and Numbers of Species Conserved , 2016 .

[24]  Libby Rumpff,et al.  Using structured decision‐making to set restoration objectives when multiple values and preferences exist , 2017 .

[25]  Richard Grenyer,et al.  What is the extent and distribution of evidence on effectiveness of systematic conservation planning around the globe? A systematic map protocol , 2016, Environmental Evidence.

[26]  J. Sanchirico,et al.  Benefits of the ballot box for species conservation. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[27]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity , 1988 .

[28]  W. Probert,et al.  Conservation Planning with Multiple Organizations and Objectives , 2010, Conservation Biology.

[29]  T. Brooks,et al.  Global Biodiversity Conservation Priorities , 2006, Science.

[30]  Max Post van der Burg,et al.  Successes and Challenges from Formation to Implementation of Eleven Broad‐Extent Conservation Programs , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[31]  D. Macmillan,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of woodland ecosystem restoration , 1998 .

[32]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection , 2014, Science.

[33]  Clinton N. Jenkins,et al.  US protected lands mismatch biodiversity priorities , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Steven J. Phillips,et al.  Aligning Conservation Priorities Across Taxa in Madagascar with High-Resolution Planning Tools , 2008, Science.

[35]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  Spatial conservation priorities are highly sensitive to choice of biodiversity surrogates and species distribution model type , 2015 .

[36]  J. Fargione,et al.  Mapping Trade-Offs in Ecosystem Services from Reforestation in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley , 2016 .

[37]  F. H. Newell,et al.  United States Geological Survey , 1900, Nature.

[38]  H. Possingham,et al.  Equitable Representation of Ecoregions is Slowly Improving Despite Strategic Planning Shortfalls , 2016 .

[39]  J. Olden,et al.  Projected climate-driven faunal movement routes. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[40]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  It's time to work together and stop duplicating conservation efforts … , 2000, Nature.

[41]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[42]  T. Brooks,et al.  Protected Areas and Effective Biodiversity Conservation , 2013, Science.

[43]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  Spatially-Correlated Risk in Nature Reserve Site Selection , 2016, PloS one.

[44]  H. Possingham,et al.  Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  David Zilberman,et al.  Targeting Tools for the Purchase of Environmental Amenities , 1997 .

[46]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Single‐species dynamic site selection , 2002 .

[47]  R. Tingley,et al.  Conservation planners tend to ignore improved accuracy of modelled species distributions to focus on multiple threats and ecological processes , 2016 .

[48]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  Global distribution and conservation of rare and threatened vertebrates , 2006, Nature.

[49]  F. Casey,et al.  What's in Noah's Wallet? Land Conservation Spending in the United States , 2007 .

[50]  V. Radeloff,et al.  Evaluating the influence of conservation plans on land protection actions in Wisconsin, USA , 2014 .

[51]  Daniel I. Rubenstein,et al.  Combining Strategies to Select Reserves in Fragmented Landscapes , 2004 .

[52]  P. Armsworth.  Inclusion of costs in conservation planning depends on limited datasets and hopeful assumptions , 2014, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[53]  L. Fahrig.  Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity , 2003 .

[54]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis , 2013 .

[55]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Conserving Biodiversity Coldspots , 2003, American Scientist.

[56]  George R. Hess,et al.  Planning open spaces for wildlife: I. Selecting focal species using a Delphi survey approach , 2002 .

[57]  Seong-Hoon Cho,et al.  A reliance on agricultural land values in conservation planning alters the spatial distribution of priorities and overestimates the acquisition costs of protected areas , 2016 .

[58]  J. Watson,et al.  The performance and potential of protected areas , 2014, Nature.

[59]  S. Polasky,et al.  Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[60]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Site‐Selection Algorithms and Habitat Loss , 2003 .

[61]  A. Roberts,et al.  Designing a practical and rigorous framework for comprehensive evaluation and prioritisation of environmental projects , 2013, Wildlife Research.

[62]  H. Possingham,et al.  Spatial conservation prioritization: Quantitative methods and computational tools , 2009, Environmental Conservation.

[63]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Conservation Goals and the Relative Importance of Costs and Benefits in Reserve Selection , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[64]  I. R. Johnson,et al.  Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal , 1994, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[65]  P. Ferraro.  Assigning priority to environmental policy interventions in a heterogeneous world , 2003 .

[66]  P. Kareiva,et al.  The Growth of Easements as a Conservation Tool , 2009, PloS one.

[67]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  CONSERVATION PLANNING WITH DYNAMIC THREATS: THE ROLE OF SPATIAL DESIGN AND PRIORITY SETTING FOR SPECIES PERSISTENCE , 2010 .

[68]  A. Kinzig,et al.  Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on Exploring Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems Exploring Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems Through Comparative Studies and Theory Development: Introduction to the Special Issue , 2006 .

[69]  Brett A. Bryan,et al.  Contribution of site assessment toward prioritising investment in natural capital , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[70]  S. Hajkowicz,et al.  Evaluation of Dairy Effluent Management Options Using Multiple Criteria Analysis , 2008, Environmental management.

[71]  Jochen A. G. Jaeger.  Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[72]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Mapping the Conservation Landscape , 2003 .