Imaging biological surface topography in situ and in vivo

Summary The creation of accurate three-dimensional reconstructions of biological surfaces is often challenging due to several inherent limitations of current imaging technologies. These include the inability to image living material, requirements for extensive specimen preparation and/or long image acquisition times, and the inability to image at length scales that are relevant for the study of interfacial phenomena that occur between the organism and its environment. In this paper, we demonstrate the use of a new imaging approach that combines the benefits of optical and contact profilometry to image organismal surfaces quickly and without the need for any kind of specimen preparation, thus permitting three-dimensional visualization in situ. As a proof of concept, we demonstrate the utility of this approach by imaging the surfaces of a wide range of live and preserved fish and other species, imaging wet, mucus-covered surfaces, and presenting quantitative metrics of surface roughness in a variety of natural and engineered materials. Given the numerous wet, sticky, and slimy surfaces that abound in nature and the importance of the interface between species and their environments for the study of numerous biophysical phenomena, we believe this approach holds considerable promise for providing new insights into surface structural complexity in biological systems.

[1]  E. Rosenberg,et al.  Drag reduction of fish skin mucus: relationship to mode of swimming and size , 1993 .

[2]  George V. Lauder,et al.  Hydrodynamics of Undulatory Propulsion , 2005 .

[3]  E. Park,et al.  Scale Growth and Squamation Chronology for the Laboratory-Reared Hermaphroditic Fish Rivulus marmoratus (Cyprinodontidae) , 2017, Ichthyological Research.

[4]  F. J. Margraf,et al.  Evaluation of scale shape for identifying spawning stocks of coastal Atlantic striped bass (Morone saxatilis) , 1993 .

[5]  Swati Varshney,et al.  MetaMesh: A hierarchical computational model for design and fabrication of biomimetic armored surfaces , 2014, Comput. Aided Des..

[6]  Louis Agassiz Recherches sur les poissons fossiles ... / par Louis Agassiz. , 1833 .

[7]  E. Ritman Micro-computed tomography-current status and developments. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[8]  S. Mackinnon,et al.  Comparison of antimicrobial activity in the epidermal mucus extracts of fish. , 2008, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology.

[9]  J. Sire,et al.  Formation of dermal skeletal and dental tissues in fish: a comparative and evolutionary approach , 2003, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[10]  George V Lauder,et al.  The hydrodynamic function of shark skin and two biomimetic applications , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[11]  K. Shephard Functions for fish mucus , 1994, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[12]  E. Adelson,et al.  Retrographic sensing for the measurement of surface texture and shape , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[13]  P. Motta,et al.  Scale morphology and flexibility in the shortfin mako Isurus oxyrinchus and the blacktip shark Carcharhinus limbatus , 2012, Journal of morphology.

[14]  M. Powell,et al.  The viscosity and glycoprotein biochemistry of salmonid mucus varies with species, salinity and the presence of amoebic gill disease , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology B.

[15]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Shark-skin surfaces for fluid-drag reduction in turbulent flow: a review , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[16]  R. Lilien Applied Research and Development of a Three- Dimensional Topography System for Firearm Identification Using Gelsight , 2014 .

[17]  L. Shackleton A comparative study of fossil fish scales from three upwelling regions , 1987 .

[18]  Q. Bone Buoyancy and Hydrodynamic Functions of Integument in the Castor Oil Fish, Ruvettus pretiosus (Pisces: Gempylidae) , 1972 .

[19]  Franz J. Giessibl,et al.  Advances in atomic force microscopy , 2003, cond-mat/0305119.

[20]  Joaquim Salvi,et al.  A state of the art in structured light patterns for surface profilometry , 2010, Pattern Recognit..

[21]  P. O’Higgins,et al.  Geometric morphometric analysis of fish scales for identifying genera, species, and local populations within the Mugilidae , 2007 .

[22]  J. Sire,et al.  Scale development in fish: a review, with description of sonic hedgehog (shh) expression in the zebrafish (Danio rerio). , 2004, The International journal of developmental biology.

[23]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Sensing and Recognizing Surface Textures Using a GelSight Sensor , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[24]  S. Swartz,et al.  Biaxial mechanical characterization of bat wing skin , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[25]  C. D. Roberts Comparative morphology of spined scales and their phylogenetic significance in the teleostei , 1993 .

[26]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Structure, biomimetics, and fluid dynamics of fish skin surfaces * , 2016 .

[27]  W. McGillis,et al.  The boundary layer of swimming fish. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[28]  G. L. Beardsley Age, growth, and reproduction of the dolphin, Coryphaena hippurus, in the straits of Florida , 1967 .

[29]  W. Kier,et al.  The Morphology and Mechanics of Octopus Suckers. , 1990, The Biological bulletin.

[30]  Victoria J Allan,et al.  Light Microscopy Techniques for Live Cell Imaging , 2003, Science.

[31]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Microgeometry capture using an elastomeric sensor , 2011, SIGGRAPH 2011.

[32]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Measurement of shear and slip with a GelSight tactile sensor , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[33]  George V Lauder,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of scale morphology in bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus. , 2016, Zoology.

[34]  E. Adelson,et al.  Localization and Manipulation of Small Parts Using , 2014 .